HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - Minutes - Community Development Advisory Commission - Meeting Date: 1/18/2024Glendale
A R I Z O N A
MINUTES
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
GLENDALE CIVIC CENTER
SAPPHIRE ROOM
5750 W. GLENN DR.
GLENDALE, ARIZONA 85301
JANUARY 18, 2024
5:30 P.M.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chair Baker called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
Present: Lisa Baker, Chair
Moises Gallegos, Vice Chair
Kelly Carbello, Committee Member
Kirstin Flores, Committee Member
David Giles, Committee Member
Theodora Hackenberg, Committee Member
Brandon Hiller, Committee Member
Carlos Vargas, Committee Member
Absent: Oscar Gonzales, Committee Member
Also Present: Matthew Hess, Community Revitalization Administrator
Ismael Cantu, Community Action Program Administrator
Yolanda Poole, Administrative Support Specialist
3. CITIZEN COMMENTS
None.
4. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
Motion by Committee Member Giles and seconded to approve the November 16, 2023
minutes of the Community Development Advisory Committee meeting, with review of
the comment attributed to Committee Member Vargas to be attributed to the correct
Committee Member upon research. The motion carried 8 - 0.
5. OLD BUSINESS
None.
6. NEW BUSINESS
a. Public Hearing 1 — 2024/25 US Department of Housing and Urban Development Annual
Action Plan
Mr. Hess opened the Public Hearing for the 2024/25 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development Annual Action Plan at 5:35 p.m. He said this was the first of two Public
Hearings and the second one was required to be held during the 30-day Public Comment
Period, which will occur at the CDAC meeting in March 2024. He said this Public Hearing
would go over the timeline, eligible activities, high level review of the Annual Action Plan, and
the overall requirements of eligibility. He said the intent of the second Public Hearing will be to
discuss the specific activity and allocation recommendation.
Mr. Hess provided a summary of the Annual Action Plan process. He said that staff did not
have final funding figures from HUD for CDBG, HOME, and ESG, however, the process
needed to begin. He said level -funding would be assumed, as in the past, for purposes of
discussion. He commented on the most typically funded activities in the past and other
eligible activities. He said the Annual Action Plan must be submitted to HUD before May
15 th of each year. He expected Council to take action at their April 23rd meeting, at which
point the formal allocations would need to be in place. He said staff was currently reviewing
the CDBG grant applications and those applications will be brought to the Committee's
February meeting for discussion and recommendation. Committee Members will be sent the
applications with staff's review within the next week in order to prepare for the February
meeting. After the February meeting, the CDAC recommendations will be taken to Council
and a draft plan will be prepared for public comment based on the outcome of the Council
meeting.
Mr. Hess opened the floor to questions or comments.
Committee Member Carbello asked what funding would go to the Master Services
Agreement. Mr. Hess said the current Council consensus was to allocate the entirety of the
ESG allocation, approximately $200,000, to sustain the Master Services Agreement. He said
because of the ongoing need to get people back in their homes and to prevent
homelessness, that funding would go specifically to those activities. He said the $200,000
would be specifically allocated to the Master Services Agreement. Committee Member
Carbello asked if that would be the total amount. Mr. Hess said that was correct. Mr. Hess
said the intent of utilizing the Master Services Agreement was to have the greatest impact,
instead of spreading the funds across various activities.
Committee Member Gallegos inquired about the typical funding for HOME and CDBG. Mr.
Hess stated that HOME was typically $750,000 and the current Council consensus on HOME
was to allocate all of the funds to the Tenant Based Rental Assistance Program. Mr. Hess
said this program was operated by the City's sub -recipient, A New Leaf. Mr. Hess said
CDBG was approximately $2.4 million, which was typically split between administration,
home repairs, and CDBG Public Services.
Mr. Hess closed the Public Hearing at 5:44 p.m.
b. CAP Plan/Organizational Standard 4.4/Organizational Standard 5.9
Mr. Cantu announced that he will be presenting on Organizational Standards for the Glendale
Community Action Program (CAP).
He said that Organizational Standard 4.4 requires that the advisory board receive an annual
update on specific strategies included in the current CAP. He announced that he will present
on the THRIVE program. He noted that Organizational Standard 5.9 requires that the
advisory board receive programmatic reports at each board meeting. He said the THRIVE
update covered in Standard 4.4 will serve as a programmatic report as well. His presentation
included the following information:
Glendale THRIVE Program
. Transcending, Hope, Resiliency, Into, Viable, Empowerment
Background
. Program Goal:
o Improve household self-sufficiency through client centered coaching
o Focus on income and asset building, education, financial literacy, network
building and maintaining housing
. Consistent with Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) framework in the
Community Needs Assessment
. Operational since August 2023 with 99 active clients working with six Success
Coaches
CSBG National Performance Indicators (NPIs)
. Six Categories
o Employment
o Education & Cognitive Development
o Income & Asset Building
o Housing
o Health & Social / Behavioral Development
o Civic Engagement & Community Involvement
o Outcomes Across Multiple Domains
THRIVE NPIs
. Specific NPI's and outcomes from the following categories were presented and
explained: Employment, Education, Income & Assets, Engagement
Mr. Hess explained that the NPI's shown at the meeting were required for CSBG and were
the best indicators to staff that indicated. progress in achieving self-sufficiency. He said there
were other NPI's worked on as well in the THRIVE program. The report of full NPI's was
provided to the Committee.
Committee Member Gallegos asked how clients were identified for the program. Mr. Cantu
said there were three different methods: people in the housing or voucher program, clients of
CAP, and youth aging out of foster care. Mr. Cantu explained that referrals were not received
from the public as it was more an internal referral for those already identified as a need for
guidance. Mr. Cantu added that the Success Coaches were doing a wonderful job.
Committee Member Gallegos said the program sounded like a great incentive for people.
Committee Member Vargas said it was an amazing program. He asked about the number of
participants served for the NPI of the number of individuals who obtained a high school
diploma and/or obtained an equivalency certificate or diploma. Mr. Cantu explained that
twenty-one people said they wanted to obtain a high school diploma.
Committee Member Vargas asked about the process to assist a participant in getting a GED.
Mr. Cantu relayed that the Success Coaches had a lot of experience and were able to
connect people with Rio Vista and Glendale Community College. Mr. Cantu noted that some
people were already engaged and the coaches were able to help them get re-engaged.
Committee Member Vargas said a high school diploma was key to getting people out of
poverty. He praised the focus on the high school diploma or associates degree. He wanted to
see what could be done to get more people to obtain this result. Mr. Cantu said staff had a
good relationship with the two colleges and wanted feedback from these partners on the
participants.
Committee Member Vargas asked for more emphasis on the NPI of the number of individuals
who improved their credit scores. He said good credit scores unlocked home and car
ownership and was very important.
Mr. Cantu commented that the coaches worked with Trellis, which does one-on-one
counseling. He said that 50 points was the increase mark to achieve to meet the NPI.
Committee Member Gallegos appreciated the focus on a savings account and said it was
very important. He also stressed the need for education and awareness of the AZ529
program.
Committee Member Carbello asked if the participants were surveyed on how they felt about
the program and services. Mr. Cantu said the participants were surveyed on Trellis and what
they would like to see in the future.
Committee Member Carbello complimented Mr. Cantu on the program's results in just four to
five months and noted how important the program was to Mr. Cantu.
7. DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Mr. Hess gave a report, which included the following information:
. Quorum is needed for next month's meeting. The meeting location will be at the
Glendale Main Library, but will be held again in the Glendale Civic Center in March.
. The Homeless Point In Time Count will be held Tuesday, January 23rd. Participants
will gather at the Main Library at 4:30 a.m. and will be using a smartphone app to
conduct the count.
. The closing on the Juniper Square project was done. This is a 605-unit development
at 67th Avenue and Maryland. The City of Glendale has approximately $4 million in the.
project from CDBG, HOME, and county ARPA funds. The total project estimate is $270
million.
. Follow Up Items:
o Committee Member Carbello had inquired about opportunity zones. This will be
an item on an upcoming agenda. Mr. Hess has reached out to Economic
Development.
o Committee Member Vargas had inquired about home ownership affordability.
Staff is working on this and will provide information in a memo format soon. The
topic can be agendized after the memo provided.
8. COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS
Committee Member Vargas clarified that he wanted data on the availability of affordable
housing and how much affordable housing Glendale had compared to other cities in the West
Valley.
Committee Member Gallegos asked if more volunteers were needed for the Point In Time
Count. Mr. Hess indicated that no further volunteers were needed.
9. NEXT MEETING
The next regular meeting of the Community Development Advisory Committee will be held on
February 15, 2023, at 5:30 p.m., in the Large Room of the Main Library, located at 5959 W.
Brown Ave., Glendale, Arizona, 85302.
10. ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Committee Member Vargas, second by Committee Member Hackenberg, to
adjourn the meeting at 6:18 p.m. Motion carried 8 — 0.
The Community Development Advisory Committee meeting minutes of January 18, 2024, were
submitted and approved on this 15th day of February, 2024.
Denise Kazmierczak
Recording Secretary