Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - Minutes - Boards of Adjustment - Meeting Date: 8/14/2008 MEETING MINUTES CITY OF GLENDALE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT GLENDALE COUNCIL CHAMBERS BUILDING CONFERENCE ROOM B3 5850 WEST GLENDALE AVENUE GLENDALE,ARIZONA 85301 THURSDAY,AUGUST 14,2008 7:00 P.M. Chairperson Sandy Burrell called the regular meeting to order at approximately 7:00 p.m. and explained the Board's policies and procedures. Chairperson Burrell conducted Roll Call with the following results: BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Sandy Burrell, Chairperson William Barker Al DeLossa Jim Ligon Peter McCormick BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT: Hugh Leonardo, Vice Chairperson CITY STAFF: Jim May,AICP, Deputy Director of Current Planning Maryann Pickering, AICP, Interim Zoning Administrator Russ Romney, Deputy City Attorney Bill Luttrell, Senior Planner Peter Kulikowski, Associate Planner Lisa Hunt, Recording Secretary Chairperson Burrell called for Approval of Minutes of the June 12, 2008, public hearing. Boardmember McCormick MADE a MOTION to APPROVE the minutes of the June 12, 2008, public hearing. Boardmember DeLossa SECONDED the MOTION. The motion passed unanimously. Chairperson Burrell asked staff if there were any requests for Withdrawals or Continuances. Ms. Maryann Pickering, AICP, Interim Zoning Administrator, stated that there were none. Chairperson Burrell called for the public hearing items. August 14,2008 Board of Adjustment Minutes Approved September 11,2008 Page 2 1. VAR08-03: A request by Catlin Court Ventures for a variance in the C-O (Commercial Office) zoning district to decrease the required street side setback to ten feet where 20 feet is required and decrease the required parking lot landscape buffer to six feet where 15 feet is required. The property is located at 7222 North 55th Avenue. Staff Contact: Peter Kulikowski, Associate Planner(Ocotillo District). Mr. Peter Kulikowski, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. He stated that the variance request appears to meet the required four findings and should be recommended for approval subject to the stipulations set forth and the site plan date-stamped June 6, 2008. He added that all mechanical equipment shall be ground mounted and all utilities shall be placed underground. In addition, an eight- foot decorative block wall shall be constructed along the west property line. Chairperson Burrell called for questions from the Board. Boardmember DeLossa asked if there were residential, single family homes at the rear of the proposed property. Mr. Kulikowski responded, yes. Boardmember DeLossa asked if the lot was currently vacant. Mr. Kulikowski stated he was correct. Boardmember Ligon asked if the property was four separate lots. Mr. Kulikowski explained there were actually two separate parcels combined into one. Boardmember DeLossa inquired if they had had any input from the neighbors that would be affected by the proposed block wall. Mr. Kulikowski stated they had received two phone calls from property owners in support of the block wall. Boardmember DeLossa asked if it was known what type of offices will occupy the lot. Mr. Kulikowski referred the question to the applicant. Chairperson Burrell called for the applicant to come forward and make their presentation. Ms. Patricia Dowd-Pitts, applicant's representative, stated she did not have anything to add to staff's presentation,however, would be happy to answer any questions. Boardmember DeLossa asked if it was known who will be occupying the space. Ms. Dowd-Pitts stated that at the moment she did not know. Chairperson Burrell asked for any additional comments from the Board. There were none. Chairperson Burrell opened the public hearing. As there were no comments from the public, the public hearing was closed. Chairperson Burrell called for any other questions or discussions from the Board. The Board had no questions;therefore, she asked Mr. Russ Romney, Deputy City Attorney, to proceed with the findings. August 14,2008 Board of Adjustment Minutes Approved September 11,2008 Page 3 Based on the facts and evidence presented, Mr. Romney requested a vote from the Board. He then went on to ask the following questions and waited as the Board was polled after each finding. Finding One: Does the Board find that there are special circumstances or conditions applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, which were not self-imposed by the owner? Chairperson Burrell called for a voice vote on the 1st finding and the Board responded with a 5-0 vote of"Aye". Finding Two: Does the Board find that due to the special circumstances, the strict application of the zoning ordinance would deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the same classification in the same zoning district? Chairperson Burrell called for a voice vote on the 2nd finding and the Board responded with a 5-0 vote of"Aye". Finding Three: Does the Board find that the variance requested is the minimum necessary to alleviate the property hardships? Chairperson Burrell called for a voice vote on the 3rd finding and the Board responded with a 5-0 vote of"Aye". Finding Four: Does the Board find the granting of the variance will not have a detrimental effect on the property, adjoining property, surrounding neighborhoods or the city in general? Chairperson Burrell called for a voice vote on the 4th finding and the Board responded with a 5-0 vote of"Aye". Mr. Romney asked if based on the findings, does the Board wish to grant variance VAR08-03 subject to the site plan and floor plan date-stamped June 6, 2008, with the stipulations set forth by the Planning Department. Chairperson Burrell called for a voice vote. The Board responded with a 5-0 vote of"Aye". Case No. VAR08-03 was APPROVED. 2. VAR08-05: A request by Rachel Avila for a variance in the R-3 (Multiple Residence) zoning district to decrease the east side-yard setback to five feet and the west side-yard setback to seven feet where 20 feet is required. The property is located at 6421 West Saguaro Drive. Staff Contact: Peter Kulikowski, Associate Planner(Barrel District). Mr. Peter Kulikowski, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. He stated the variance request appears to meet the required four findings and should be recommended for approval subject to the August 14,2008 Board of Adjustment Minutes Approved September 11,2008 Page 4 stipulations set forth and the site plan date-stamped May 9, 2008. He added all mechanical equipment shall be ground mounted and all utilities under 69kv shall be placed underground. Chairperson Burrell called for questions from the Board. Boardmember Ligon asked if the shaded area on the map was to also be developed. Mr. Kulikowski stated the area was to be developed, however, the bottom shaded half was the area to be added to the structure. Boardmember Ligon commented that the addition was the same width of the home. Mr. Kulikowski stated he was correct. Boardmember McCormick asked if the area homes were legal non-conforming. Mr. Kulikowski explained yes, technically, the homes do not meet the current setbacks. Boardmember McCormick asked what the new rear setback would be on this property. Mr. Kulikowski stated they would be 32 feet. Chairperson Burrell called for the applicant to come forward and make their presentation. Mr. Brent Brooks, applicant's representative, stated he had nothing to add to staff's presentation, however,would be happy to answer any questions from the Board. Boardmember Ligon asked of the intent of the construction. Mr. Brooks stated it was an addition to the family home. Chairperson Burrell asked for any additional comments from the Board. There were none. Chairperson Burrell opened the public hearing. As there were no comments from the public, the public hearing was closed. Chairperson Burrell called for any other questions or discussions from the Board. The Board had no questions;therefore, she asked Mr. Russ Romney, Deputy City Attorney,to proceed with the findings. Based on the facts and evidence presented, Mr. Romney requested a vote from the Board. He then went on to ask the following questions and waited as the Board was polled after each finding. Finding One: Does the Board find that there are special circumstances or conditions applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, which were not self-imposed by the owner? Chairperson Burrell called for a voice vote on the 1st finding and the Board responded with a 5-0 vote of"Aye". August 14,2008 Board of Adjustment Minutes Approved September 11,2008 Page 5 Finding Two: Does the Board find that due to the special circumstances, the strict application of the zoning ordinance would deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the same classification in the same zoning district? Chairperson Burrell called for a voice vote on the 2nd finding and the Board responded with a 5-0 vote of"Aye". Finding Three: Does the Board find that the variance requested is the minimum necessary to alleviate the property hardships? Chairperson Burrell called for a voice vote on the 3rd finding and the Board responded with a 5-0 vote of"Aye". Finding Four: Does the Board find the granting of the variance will not have a detrimental effect on the property, adjoining property, surrounding neighborhoods or the city in general? Chairperson Burrell called for a voice vote on the 4th finding and the Board responded with a 5-0 vote of"Aye". Mr. Romney asked if based on the findings, does the Board wish to grant variance VAR08-05 subject to the site plan and floor plan date-stamped May 9, 2008, with the stipulations set forth by the Planning Department. Chairperson Burrell called for a voice vote. The Board responded with a 5-0 vote of"Aye". Case No. VAR08-05 was APPROVED. 3. VAR08-06: A request by Roger and Marilyn McCullough for a variance in the A-1 (Agricultural) zoning district to decrease the required accessory structure setback to six feet where 12 feet is required and increase maximum lot coverage to 11% where 10% is required. The property is located at 5135 West Escuda Drive. Staff Contact: Peter Kulikowski, Associate Planner(Cholla District). Mr. Peter Kulikowski, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. He stated the variance request appears to meet the required four findings and should be recommended for approval subject to the stipulations set forth and the site plan date-stamped May 9, 2008. He added all mechanical equipment shall be ground mounted and all utilities under 69kv shall be placed underground. Chairperson Burrell called for questions from the Board. Boardmember Ligon asked for clarification on items shown on the map. Mr. Kulikowski stated what was being shown was the Escuda Commercial Office Complex. August 14,2008 Board of Adjustment Minutes Approved September 11,2008 Page 6 Chairperson Burrell asked if they owned all the surrounding property or only the property directly behind it. Mr. Kulikowski stated that they only owned the parcel behind it. Boardmember Ligon asked if there was a buffer wall separating the property from the freeway. Mr. Kulikowski stated that there was a screen wall on the office property, which buffers the office complex. Boardmember McCormick inquired as to the height of the garage in regards to the exsisting garages. Mr. Kulikowski stated that the total height is 17 feet and the exsisting garages were 24 feet. Boardmember Barker inquired about access to the garage. Mr. Kulikowski explained the ingress and egress to the garage on the aerial map. Chairperson Burrell called for any other questions from the Board. There were none. Chairperson Burrell called for the applicant to come forward and make their presentation. Ms. Marilyn McCullough, applicant, stated that she did not have anything new to offer, but will answer any questions. Boardmember McCormick asked the applicant how long she had lived on the property. She stated that she had lived there starting in 1984. He then went on to ask her the dimensions of her recreational vehicle (RV). Ms. McCullough informed them the RV was 45 feet long and 13.6 feet tall. Boardmember Barker asked if she foresees any problems coming in and out of the garage. Ms. McCullough stated that she would not have any problems. Chairperson Burrell asked for any additional comments from the Board. There were none. Chairperson Burrell opened the public hearing. As there were no comments from the public, the public hearing was closed. Chairperson Burrell called for any other questions or discussions from the Board. The Board had no questions;therefore, she asked Mr. Russ Romney, Deputy City Attorney,to proceed with the findings. Based on the facts and evidence presented, Mr. Romney requested a vote from the Board. He then went on to ask the following questions and waited as the Board was polled after each finding. Finding One: Does the Board find that there are special circumstances or conditions applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, which were not self-imposed by the owner? The Board was polled on the 1st finding and responded with a 5-0 vote of"Aye". August 14,2008 Board of Adjustment Minutes Approved September 11,2008 Page 7 Finding Two: Does the Board find that due to the special circumstances, the strict application of the zoning ordinance would deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the same classification in the same zoning district? The Board was polled on the 2nd finding and responded with a 5-0 vote of"Aye". Finding Three: Does the Board find that the variance requested is the minimum necessary to alleviate the property hardships? The Board was polled on the 3rd finding and responded with a 5-0 vote of"Aye". Finding Four: Does the Board find the granting of the variance will not have a detrimental effect on the property, adjoining property, surrounding neighborhoods or the city in general? The Board was polled on the 4th finding and responded with a 5-0 vote of"Aye". Mr. Romney asked if based on the findings, does the Board wish to grant variance VAR08-06 subject to the site plan and floor plan date-stamped May 9, 2008, with the stipulations set forth by the Planning Department. Chairperson Burrell called for a voice vote. The Board responded with a 5-0 vote of "Aye". VAR08-06 was APPROVED. 4. Executive Session: In accordance with Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) §38- 431.03(A)(3), which states that upon a public majority vote of the members constituting a quorum, a public body may hold an executive session but only for the following purpose: Discussion or consultation for legal advice with the attorney or attorneys of the public body. Therefore, the Board of Adjustment may convene in "Executive Session" to receive legal advice. As provided by state statute, this session is closed to the public. Chairperson Burrell explained the procedures that would constitute holding an Executive Session. She indicated that only matters of legality and not the actual cases would be discussed. She added in order to go into Executive Session, a motion and a second would have to be made and passed. Boardmember McCormick MADE a MOTION to HOLD an Executive Session for the purpose of a discussion and consultation for legal advice. Boardmember DeLossa SECONDED the MOTION. The motion passed unanimously. The Board retreated to Executive Session at approximately 7:40 p.m. Chairperson Burrell called the meeting back to order at approximately 8:07 p.m. August 14,2008 Board of Adjustment Minutes Approved September 11,2008 Page 8 5. GH06-16: A request by Iudita Leahu to appeal the decision by the Planning Director to expire a sixty day reservation request to expand an existing adult group home for five or less residents to a maximum of ten residents. The property is located at 8497 West Nicolet Avenue. Staff Contact: Bill Luttrell, Senior Planner(Yucca District). Mr. Bill Luttrell, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. He stated the letter to expand was approved on September 25, 2006. He stated that on November 27, 2006, a request to extend the reservation for the application was approved since the fire sprinkler plans were in plan review with the City of Glendale, and were not approved. Subsequently, two additional extensions were requested since the sprinkler plans continued to be under review with the City of Glendale. On March 23, 2007, a permit was issued for the installation of the fire sprinklers. On May 8, 2007, a stop work order was issued by the building safety inspector because the required changes to convert the residence to an assisted living facility, were not being performed by an Arizona licensed commercial contractor. Mr. Luttrell continued, stating, that the Fire Department had approved the fire sprinkler system. This inspection is different and separate from the building safety inspections for the remodel of the residence. The Group Home application for the reservation had expired, since the city had not received a request to extend the reservation. The modification corrections for the assisted living facility had not been completed. Consequently, an inspection of the property was preformed on September 10, 2007, and failed. Mr. Luttrell stated that on July 3, 2007, the appellant submitted plans to the Building Safety Department for modifications and on September 5, 2007, the plan for the project were approved. The applicant's representative was contacted to provide the general contractor's information and bond certification. The applicant's representative responded that the information would be forth coming. No communications or information was received from December 10, 2007, to April 15, 2008. Mr. Luttrell stated he had received a call on April 5, 2008, from the applicant asking for assistance in getting the Certificate of Occupancy for the expansion of her group home. The reservation expired on June 2, 2007, therefore; she would be unable to expand the group home. However, she would still be able to operate the current facility. He noted that the applicant had stated she had been under the impression that when the Fire Department inspected and approved the fire sprinkler installation, the process was finished and she would receive the Certificate of Occupancy. Mr. Luttrell indicated the decision regarding the expiration of the sixty day reservation request did consider all relevant portions of the Zoning Ordinance. He noted the required Board's action was to conduct a public hearing on the appeal and affirm, modify, or reverse the decision by the Planning Director. Chairperson Burrell called for questions from the Board. Chairperson Burrell inquired if the reservation requests started in 2006. Mr. Luttrell stated she was correct. He indicated the chronological order of dates and events submitted by staff. August 14,2008 Board of Adjustment Minutes Approved September 11,2008 Page 9 Boardmember DeLossa asked for clarification on an area on the map. Mr. Luttrell stated the blue area represented group homes housing six to ten residents. He added the radius represents the one quarter mile separation requirement. Chairperson Burrell asked Mr. Luttrell to confirm the fact that no communication was received from December, 2007, to April, 2008. In addition, she asked him to clarify the requirements for extensions. Mr. Luttrell stated the requirement to have a reservation with the Planning Department for a group home and the requirement to ascertain were two separated issues. He explained that with the approval, they were granted a sixty day reservation to submit plans to the city, if necessary, and obtain their Certificate of Occupancy and State License. He informed them this was a separate process from the Building Department requirements. The change in the occupancy only occurs when there are six to ten residents living in a group home, therefore, requiring the home to have a sprinkler system. He noted these inspection requirements take time; therefore, requiring additional extensions were necessary. However, no request for extension had been submitted. Boardmember DeLossa asked if the applicant had missed three deadline extensions. Mr. Luttrell explained the applicant had applied for three requests, but had only missed the last request deadline. Boardmember DeLossa asked if the applicant provided a reason for the missed deadline. Mr. Luttrell stated the reason provided was they were busy with the fire sprinkler plan, as well as the remodel. Boardmember Barker commented on staffs recent discovery that there was an existing group home located near this facility. He asked Mr. Luttrell if the Planning Department would have approved this request if they had known of the facility's existence. Mr. Luttrell responded the approval would have been denied. Chairperson Burrell inquired about the city's tracking system initiated in 2004 for tracking these facilities. Mr. Luttrell stated that part of the review process was in accordance with the Department of Health. He added there were some homes not listed on the Department of Health register; therefore, they had not been aware of this facility until it was brought it to their attention. Chairperson Burrell commented that tracking these facilities was a huge undertaking for the city and it would take them some time. Boardmember DeLossa inquired if the applicant was the owner and manager of the facility. Mr. Luttrell stated he was correct. He asked if the applicant had other group homes. Mr. Luttrell referred the question to the applicant. Boardmember McCormick asked what had prompted the delay in the fire inspection approval. Mr. Luttrell stated there were a lot of different things occurring at the same time, which possibly delayed approval. Boardmember Ligon asked Mr. Luttrell if the Planning Department acted appropriately in regards to this case. Mr. Luttrell stated that was for the Board members to decide. August 14,2008 Board of Adjustment Minutes Approved September 11,2008 Page 10 Boardmember DeLossa asked how many residents will be occupying one bedroom. Mr. Luttrell referred the question to the applicant. Chairperson Burrell called for the applicant to come forward and make a presentation. Ms. Iudita Leahu, applicant, stated that she would like to receive a new extension in order to move forward with this application. She said she became confused with the repeated extensions. She related the difficulties she had with the inspection and extension requirements. She noted she was now aware of the many requirements needed to obtain approval. Chairperson Burrell asked Ms. Leahu at what point she believed another extension was not needed. Ms. Leahu stated it was in June of 2007, because the fire inspection had been approved in May of 2007. Boardmember Ligon asked how often the facility was inspected. Ms. Leahu stated they received inspections every year. He went on to ask how long she had been in the business. She replied, 17 years. Boardmember DeLossa asked of the purpose for the expansion. Ms. Leahu stated she had a very large home and had received many calls asking for vacancies. Boardmember Ligon commented that the applicant had spent close to $20,000 on improvements. He asked what rate she charged. Ms. Leahu stated she charged$2,000 a month. Boardmember DeLossa asked how many residents were in residence now. She said she had three residents now. She explained how many residents depart or go into hospice care, therefore, occupancy changes quite often. She also reported on the aid assistants she has,which includes her husband. Boardmember Ligon asked if she owned any other group homes in the area. Ms. Leahu replied, no. Chairperson Burrell commented she was having a hard time with the fact that the applicant had been in this business for 17 years, however, was not aware of how the process worked. She asked the applicant to explain. Ms. Leahu indicated this was the first time requesting an application to increase to ten residents and was not clear on how the process worked. Chairperson Burrell reiterated her misgivings in the applicant's lack of knowledge in the system, when her investment totaled $20,000. Boardmember DeLossa asked if there was a nurse on-call on the premises. Ms. Leahu responded she had both a nurse and a doctor on-call. She added that she also had some health experience, however, was not a nurse. Boardmember Ligon stated that he heard that once you increase the number of people in home that it could change things. Boardmember DeLossa cautioned the applicant that having more residents could cause problems, patients don't always get along. Ms. Leahu explained she enjoyed and loved working with the residents and did not see a problem with additions. She provided details on the house, stating it provided seven bedrooms including a 1,500 square foot basement for additional family space. August 14,2008 Board of Adjustment Minutes Approved September 11,2008 Page 11 Mr. Luttrell reiterated and explained the required Board action. He explained regardless of the issues raised by the inspections, or the confusion as to what constituted final approval of the project, the Planning Department must enforce the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. He noted the result was that the Planning Department did not receive the last request, therefore, needs to enforce the required process. Boardmember Barker referred to a letter sent by the Planning Department asking for a copy of the State of Arizona license and a copy of the Certificate of Occupancy, which is required on a regular basis. He asked if the applicant had complied with the request. Ms. Leahu responded she had not. She said she was still waiting on additional information. Boardmember DeLossa asked if it would be appropriate for the Board to grant them an additional extension or was that option no longer available. Mr. Luttrell explained it was up to the Board to modify, affirm or reverse the decision. Chairperson Burrell thanked the applicant. Chairperson Burrell asked for any further comments or questions. Boardmember McCormick stated that this seemed like a case of several misunderstandings combined with some unfortunate circumstances. He asked if the other group home had not existed, would the applicant be allowed to start the process over again and be granted the application, providing all requirements were met on time. Mr. Luttrell stated he was correct. He added if it would have been granted, the application would still be valid, even with the discovery of the additional facility being in close proximity. Boardmember Barker asked who issued the Certificate of Occupancy. Mr. Luttrell replied it was handled through the Building and Safety Department. Chairperson Burrell asked how many different agencies the applicant had to go through in order to complete the process. Mr. Luttrell stated the approval letter issued to the applicant included a paragraph informing them to contact the Development Services Center. This Service Center will provide guidance as to the necessary plans, submittals and requirements needed. Chairperson Burrell opened the floor for public comments. Mr. Leahu, applicant's husband, stated that after the remodel was completed, they had difficulties reaching the inspectors. He stated the house was ready to be approved. He noted the problems began to occur when communications broke down. He asked the Board to approve their request. Boardmember DeLossa asked how many children were living with them in the house. Mr. Leahu stated their 11 children lived with them on the property. Boardmember Ligon commented that 10 residents, 11 August 14,2008 Board of Adjustment Minutes Approved September 11,2008 Page 12 children and 2 adults, was quite a lot of people. Mr. Leahu said they had been planning on relocating their family. Chairperson Burrell closed the public hearing. Chairperson Burrell called for any other questions or discussions from the Board. Chairperson Burrell agreed with Boardmember McCormick in stating there had been a lot of good intention, but also a lot of confusion as to the process. She indicated the Board had to decide if proper procedure was followed. She stated it was clearly stated that an extension for the reservation had to be made in writing. She explained it was the applicant's responsibility to follow those instructions. Boardmember Barker stated the Board had to examine the findings and decide whether the Planning Department made an error in their decision. He said based on the testimony heard tonight, it had not been the case. He noted it was unfortunate it had been the result of confusion; however, the reservation process is clearly stated, and procedures must be followed. Chairperson Burrell stated that it is the applicant's responsibility to ensure they had all the required paperwork, not the city. She said the proper process and procedures must be followed. Boardmember DeLossa stated the situation was unfortunate for the applicant, and asked if it was advisable to ask for a 30 day extension. Chairperson Burrell stated the Board's only focus should be if the Planning Department made an error in their decision. She said in her view, no mistake was made because the applicant had all the required information, and for whatever reason, did not follow procedure. Boardmember Ligon commented the applicant had the responsibility to proceed and abide by the required procedures, especially because of the amount of money they had placed into the home. Chairperson Burrell asked for any additional comments from the Board. There were none. Chairperson Burrell called for any other questions or discussions from the Board. The Board had no questions;therefore, she asked Mr. Russ Romney, Deputy City Attorney, to proceed with the findings. Mr. Romney instructed Ms. Lisa Hunt, Recording Secretary, to poll the Board on agenda item GH06- 16. He stated that denying the appeal would support the Planning Director's decision. Does the Board find that the Planning Director did evaluate and consider all relevant information related to the Zoning Ordinance, and considered all decisions and interpretations? If so, a vote to deny the appeal would support the decision. Ms. Lisa Hunt, Recording Secretary, polled the Board. They responded with the following results: Boardmember Barker — Deny, Boardmember DeLossa — Deny, Boardmember Ligon — August 14,2008 Board of Adjustment Minutes Approved September 11,2008 Page 13 Deny, Boardmember McCormick — Deny and Chairperson Burrell — Deny. Case No. GH06-16 was DENIED unanimously. Chairperson Burrell called for Other Business. 6. OATH OF OFFICE: Mr. Russ Romney, Deputy City Attorney, to administer Chairperson Sandy Burrell's reappointment Oath of Office. Mr. Russ Romney, Deputy City Attorney, re-administered the Oath of Office to Chairperson Sandy Burrell. Chairperson Burrell was re-appointed to office. Chairperson Burrell called for the Planning Staff Report. There was none. Chairperson Burrell called for Board Comments and Suggestions. As there were none, the meeting adjourned at 9:07 p.m. Next Meeting: September 11, 2008, at 7:00 p.m. Lisa H �t%ecordM . Secretary