HomeMy WebLinkAboutAudit - Other Publications - Public - Professional Management Services and Arena Lease Agreement Contract Compliance Review - 7/7/2017
_____________________________________________________________________________________
City Auditor’s Office 1 FY15 PMSA Compliance Review
1.
Date: July 7, 2017
To: Kevin R. Phelps, City Manager
From: Candace MacLeod, City Auditor
Subject: Contract Compliance Review: Professional Management Services and Arena
Lease Agreement
The City Auditor’s Office performed a contract compliance review of the Professional
Management Services and Arena Lease Agreement (PMSA) in March 2017 for the
period July 1, 2014 to July 24, 2015. The purpose of the review was to determine whether
the terms and conditions of the PMSA were being complied with by the City and
IceArizona. A prior review was conducted by the City Auditor’s Office in 2015 for FY14,
which provided 40 recommendations to management. In 2017, management
indicated that all 40 recommendations had been addressed, either by the 2015
Settlement Agreement, the 2015 Amendment to the PMSA, or other actions that were
taken.
Background
On July 8, 2013, the City entered into the PMSA (C-8532) with IceArizona Manager Co.,
LP and IceArizona Hockey Co., LP (IceArizona) to manage the Gila River Arena facility.
In consideration of IceArizona’s agreement to perform management and other services
set forth in the PMSA, the City agreed to pay IceArizona a $15,000,000 annual
management fee for 15 years. Under the terms of the PMSA, the City would receive
surcharge, supplemental surcharge, parking and naming rights revenue, rent and other
reimbursements, including safety and security costs.
In FY15, the City received $5.68 M. in revenue under the PMSA and expended $15.5 M.
in management fees and capital improvement costs.
Settlement Agreement and First Amendment to PMSA
On July 24, 2015, the City and IceArizona entered into a Settlement Agreement and
Mutual Release (Settlement Agreement) whereby both parties released one another
from any and all claims. On July 24, 2015, the City also entered into the first amendment
to the PMSA (Amendment) with IceArizona (C-8532-4). The amendment reduced the
City’s annual management fee payable from $15,000,000 to $6,500,000 and eliminated
all revenue sharing provisions between IceArizona and the City except for those
relating to naming rights. The Amendment reduced the term of the agreement from
fifteen years to four years with a June 30, 2017 termination date. Under the
_____________________________________________________________________________________
City Auditor’s Office 2 FY15 PMSA Compliance Review
1.
Amendment, the City had the option to replace the Arena Manager at any time after
June 30, 2016 with a 90 day notice. The City chose to exercise the option to replace
the Arena Manager, effective July 1, 2016. Following the City’s exercise of this option,
AEG Facilities was chosen to manage the Arena with the professional hockey team
contractually agreeing to occupy the facility through June 30, 2017.
Scope and Methodology
The scope of the contract compliance review was July 1, 2014 to July 24, 2015.
Information requested by the City was provided by IceArizona and viewed
electronically at the Gila River Arena.
Review procedures included: follow-up on findings reported in FY14 review; interviews
with staff from the City and IceArizona; review of financial reports and agreements; and
confirmation of paid admissions and ticket sales.
Summary of Findings
1. Qualified Tickets: The FY14 review identified $39,640 in surcharge and supplemental
surcharge fees due to the City. According to the City Attorney’s Office, the
Settlement Agreement addressed this claim. No discrepancies of this nature were
identified during the FY15 review.
2. Naming Rights: The FY14 review identified between $76,460 and $239,460 in naming
rights revenue due to the City. According to the City Attorney’s Office, the
Settlement Agreement addressed this claim. No naming rights discrepancies were
identified during the FY15 review.
3. Supplemental Surcharge Escrow Account: The FY14 review reported that a
supplemental surcharge escrow account was not established in accordance with
the PMSA and funds were wired to the City for fees collected during the year on July
9, 2014. In FY15, City supplemental surcharge fees collected during the year were
deposited into the escrow account beginning on March 13, 2015.
4. Community Events: The FY14 review indicated that controls over the negotiation,
formalization, and approval of Community Events had not been established. In FY14,
the City was unable to verify whether it had received its correct share of the
proceeds from the Arizona Interscholastic Association (AIA) Basketball Tournament
because it did not have a copy of the AIA Event License Agreement (AIA
Agreement) between the IceArizona, Global Spectrum, and the AIA. Although the
City received the AIA Agreement during the City’s FY14 review, the City split $24,510
in 2015 AIA parking revenue with IceArizona, even though the AIA Agreement
stated that the City would retain 100% of the parking fees. The City also split $39,998
_____________________________________________________________________________________
City Auditor’s Office 3 FY15 PMSA Compliance Review
1.
in facility use charges with IceArizona even though the PMSA stated that these fees
should not be charged to the City. A review of AIA revenue paid to the City was
conducted by IceArizona during the City’s FY15 review. IceArizona indicated that
an additional $32,776 was potentially owed to the City for AIA events held in 2014
and 2015. According to the City Attorney’s Office, the Settlement Agreement
addressed this claim. The 2015 AIA event ended on March 2, 2015 and the City
received 50% of the event proceeds on April 3, 2015. The supplemental surcharge
fee for AIA was wired to the City on July 9, 2015, four months after the event. In
addition, the City did not have official documentation to support the waiver or
reduction of surcharge, supplemental surcharge, and parking fees for either of the
two Community Events held in FY15.
5. Safety and Security Fees: The FY14 review reported that the City was not charging
IceArizona for overhead costs associated with safety and security services. The FY15
review indicated that the same issue still existed. IceArizona paid the City the FY15
Safety and Security Fee of $182,828 on July 1, 2014, in accordance with the PMSA. A
year-end reconciliation was performed by the City on September 28, 2015. The
reconciliation indicated that IceArizona was owed a refund of $6,049, which was
paid by the City on October 6, 2015. However, the City did not charge IceArizona
safety and security overhead costs associated with technology, fuel, and vehicles.
In addition to overhead, $300 in Fire Department permit fees for one community
event and one hockey game were not charged to the Arena, along with $9,000 in
Fire Marshal inspection fees. According to the City Attorney’s Office, the Settlement
Agreement addressed this claim. The City charged IceArizona for 100% of the fire
administration’s secretary salary; however, staff reported that the full salary
allocation was an overstatement. Fire reported that additional staff worked on
scheduling and were not included in the department’s cost summary. The auditors
also noted that the hourly rates charged by Fire, Police, and Transportation for
personnel providing safety and security services were understated. Approximately
75% of payments to the City from IceArizona for safety and security services were
not made within 30 days, as required by the PMSA. An annual reconciliation was not
performed by the City in FY15 to ensure recovery of actual costs plus overhead.
6. Sales Tax: The FY14 review indicated that IceArizona and the City had not clarified
responsibilities regarding the collection and remittance of sales tax on certain Arena
revenues. In 2017, management indicated that this issue would be addressed when
the Department of Revenue conducts an audit.
7. Contract Administrator: The FY14 review reported that neither the City nor IceArizona
formally designated a representative at the working level to act as a contract
administrator for the PMSA. In 2017, management indicated that a contract
manager was hired in October 2016.
8. Monthly and Quarterly Financial Reports: The FY14 review reported that the City did
not retain documentation to verify whether IceArizona monthly reports were
_____________________________________________________________________________________
City Auditor’s Office 4 FY15 PMSA Compliance Review
1.
submitted in accordance with the PMSA. The FY15 review indicated that all monthly
and two quarterly financial reports were submitted to the City late.
9. Surcharge Fees: The FY14 review indicated that 32% of surcharge fees were
submitted to the City late by IceArizona. The FY15 review noted that 10% of
surcharge fees were submitted late.
Management’s response to the FY14 and FY15 compliance review is attached as
Appendix A.
Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.
cc: Michael D. Bailey, City Attorney
Tom Duensing, Assistant City Manager
Vicki Rios, Director of Budget and Finance
Appendix A
PMSA Contract Compliance Review
Management Responses
_____________________________________________________________________________________
City Auditor’s Office 5 FY15 PMSA Compliance Review
Recommendation
Management
Response August 2015
Management
Response March 2017 Status
1.1 The City should request
that the Arena Manager
provide the City with the
Team Owner’s audited
financial statements for
the period ended June
30, 2015.
In light of the settlement
agreement between
the parties and the
amendment to the
PMSA, this
recommendation is no
longer applicable.
Same response as
August 2015.
Closed
1.2 The City, the Arena
Manager and the Team
Owner should formalize
the definition of
“operating loss” in the
PMSA.
In light of the settlement
agreement between
the parties and the
amendment to the
PMSA, this
recommendation is no
longer applicable.
Same response as
August 2015.
Closed
1.3 The City should seek
legal interpretation to
determine whether the
lack of provision of the
Team Owner’s 2013/2014
audited financial
statements and the
inability to verify the
Team Owner’s operating
loss is deemed to be a
violation of the PMSA.
In light of the settlement
agreement between
the parties and the
amendment to the
PMSA, this
recommendation is no
longer applicable.
Same response as
August 2015.
Closed
2.1 The City should seek
legal interpretation as to
whether management
fees paid to the Arena
Manager can or cannot
be used to pay for the
Team Owner’s debt
associated with the
acquisition of a hockey
team.
Management reviewed
the legal opinion from
outside counsel
Mariscal, Weeks,
MacIntyre, and
Friedlander, PA
regarding a substantially
similar management
agreement. Per that
legal opinion,
management believes
that payment of the
management fees may
constitute a public
purpose.
Same response as
August 2015.
Closed
Appendix A
PMSA Contract Compliance Review
Management Responses
_____________________________________________________________________________________
City Auditor’s Office 6 FY15 PMSA Compliance Review
Recommendation
Management
Response August 2015
Management
Response March 2017 Status
3.1 The City should seek
legal interpretation as to
the amount of naming
rights still owed to the
City by the Arena
Manager and submit a
demand for payment of
that amount.
In light of the settlement
agreement between
the parties and the
amendment to the
PMSA, this
recommendation is no
longer applicable.
Same response as
August 2015.
Closed
3.2 The City should seek
legal interpretation as to
whether failure to
provide naming rights
payments due to the City
is a violation of the PMSA.
In light of the settlement
agreement between
the parties and the
amendment to the
PMSA, this
recommendation is no
longer applicable.
Same response as
August 2015.
Closed
4.1 The City should review
surcharge and
supplemental surcharge
fees remitted to the City
in 2013/2014 and seek
legal interpretation to
determine any amounts
still due to the City from
the Arena Manager on
qualified ticket sales.
In light of the settlement
agreement between
the parties and the
amendment to the
PMSA, this
recommendation is no
longer applicable.
Same response as
August 2015.
Closed
5.1 The City should seek
legal interpretation as to
whether the lack of
establishment of a
Supplemental Surcharge
Escrow Account and the
failure to deposit
supplemental surcharge
fees into the Escrow
Account was a violation
of the PMSA.
In light of the settlement
agreement between
the parties and the
amendment to the
PMSA, this
recommendation is no
longer applicable.
Same response as
August 2015.
Closed
Appendix A
PMSA Contract Compliance Review
Management Responses
_____________________________________________________________________________________
City Auditor’s Office 7 FY15 PMSA Compliance Review
Recommendation
Management
Response August 2015
Management
Response March 2017 Status
5.2 The City should request
that the Arena Manager
establish a Supplemental
Surcharge Escrow
Account and deposit the
supplemental surcharge
fees into the Escrow
Account in accordance
with the PMSA and verify
this is occurring.
In light of the settlement
agreement between
the parties and the
amendment to the
PMSA, thi s
recommendation is no
longer applicable.
Same response as
August 2015.
Closed
5.3 The City and the Arena
Manager should
formalize deposit timeline
requirements for the
Supplemental Surcharge.
In light of the settlement
agreement between
the parties and the
amendment to the
PMSA, this
recommendation is no
longer applicable.
Same response as
August 2015.
Closed
5.4 The City should assess
accrued interest lost on
the Supplemental
Surcharge Account for
2013/2014 and consider
issuing a demand for this
amount from the Arena
Manager.
In light of the settlement
agreement between
the parties and the
amendment to the
PMSA, this
recommendation is no
longer applicable.
Same response as
August 2015.
Closed
6.1 The City should issue a
formal demand for the
Team Owner’s financial
statements in
accordance with the
PMSA.
In light of the settlement
agreement between
the parties and the
amendment to the
PMSA, this
recommendation is no
longer applicable.
Same response as
August 2015.
Closed
6.2 The City should seek
legal interpretation to
determine whether
failure to provide the
Team Owner’s audited
financial statements to
the City is deemed to be
a violation of the PMSA.
In light of the settlement
agreement between
the parties and the
amendment to the
PMSA, this
recommendation is no
longer applicable.
Same response as
August 2015.
Closed
Appendix A
PMSA Contract Compliance Review
Management Responses
_____________________________________________________________________________________
City Auditor’s Office 8 FY15 PMSA Compliance Review
Recommendation
Management
Response August 2015
Management
Response March 2017 Status
7.1 The City should clarify
responsibilities for the
collection and
remittance of sales taxes
associated with the
PMSA with the Arena
Manager.
The City will work with
the Arena Manager and
clarify responsibilities for
collection and
remittance of sales
taxes by December 31,
2015.
The City worked with
the Arena Manager
and the Arizona
Department of
Revenue who
intended to initiate an
audit regarding any
potential tax liabilities.
When audits are
conducted by the
Arizona Department
of Revenue, they
represent the City as
well.
Closed
7.2 The City should review
sales tax liabilities
associated with the
PMSA and file amended
returns, as appropriate.
The City will review the
sales tax liabilities
associated with the
PMSA and file amended
returns, as appropriate,
by December 31, 2015.
The City worked with
the Arena Manager
and the Arizona
Department of
Revenue who
intended to initiate an
audit regarding any
potential tax liabilities.
When audits are
conducted by the
Arizona Department
of Revenue, they
represent the City as
well.
Closed
8.1 The City will review the
sales tax liabilities
associated with the
PMSA and file amended
returns, as appropriate,
by December 31, 2015.
In light of the settlement
agreement between
the parties and the
amendment to the
PMSA, this
recommendation is no
longer applicable.
The City worked with
the Arena Manager
and the Arizona
Department of
Revenue who
intended to initiate an
audit regarding any
potential tax liabilities.
When audits are
conducted by the
Arizona Department
of Revenue, they
represent the City as
well.
Closed
Appendix A
PMSA Contract Compliance Review
Management Responses
_____________________________________________________________________________________
City Auditor’s Office 9 FY15 PMSA Compliance Review
Recommendation
Management
Response August 2015
Management
Response March 2017 Status
8.2 The City should consider
including provisions for
permanent records and
document retention
requirements in all City
contracts.
In light of the settlement
agreement between
the parties and the
amendment to the
PMSA, this
recommendation is no
longer applicable.
Same response as
August 2015.
Closed
8.3 The City should
reconsider bearing the
full expense for
accessing
documentation from the
Arena Manager and the
Team Owner during
future reviews.
In light of the settlement
agreement between
the parties and the
amendment to the
PMSA, this
recommendation is no
longer applicable.
Same response as
August 2015.
Closed
8.4 The City should seek
legal interpretation to
ensure the Audit
Addendum was properly
authorized.
In light of the settlement
agreement between
the parties and the
amendment to the
PMSA, this
recommendation is no
longer applicable.
Same response as
August 2015.
Closed
9.1 The City, the Arena
Manager and the Team
Owner should establish
controls regarding the
negotiation,
formalization, approval
and monitoring of
Community Events held
under the PMSA,
including the AIA License
Agreement.
In light of the settlement
agreement between
the parties and the
amendment to the
PMSA, this
recommendation is no
longer applicable.
Same response as
August 2015.
Closed
Appendix A
PMSA Contract Compliance Review
Management Responses
_____________________________________________________________________________________
City Auditor’s Office 10 FY15 PMSA Compliance Review
Recommendation
Management
Response August 2015
Management
Response March 2017 Status
10.1 The City should request
that the Arena Manager
remit detailed backup
reports to support
parking revenue
remittances in 2014/2015
and in the future to
ensure parking rates are
in compliance with the
PMSA.
In light of the settlement
agreement between
the parties and the
amendment to the
PMSA, this
recommendation is no
longer applicable.
Same response as
August 2015.
Closed
10.2 The City should work with
the Arena Manager to
ensure parking revenue is
remitted in a timely
manner in accordance
with the PMSA.
In light of the settlement
agreement between
the parties and the
amendment to the
PMSA, this
recommendation is no
longer applicable.
Same response as
August 2015.
Closed
10.3 The City should work with
the Arena Manager to
develop a set of mutually
acceptable policies,
procedures and internal
controls for the operation
of the Arena Parking
Areas in accordance
with the PMSA.
In light of the settlement
agreement between
the parties and the
amendment to the
PMSA, this
recommendation is no
longer applicable.
Same response as
August 2015.
Closed
10.4 The City should work with
the Arena Manager to
ensure the Arena’s
official parking matrix is
accurate and complete
and parking spaces are
utilized efficiently and
effectively.
In light of the settlement
agreement between
the parties and the
amendment to the
PMSA, this
recommendation is no
longer applicable.
Same response as
August 2015.
Closed
10.5 The City should work with
the Arena Manager to
evaluate parking internal
controls to ensure all
parking revenue due to
the City is received.
In light of the settlement
agreement between
the parties and the
amendment to the
PMSA, this
recommendation is no
longer applicable.
Same response as
August 2015.
Closed
Appendix A
PMSA Contract Compliance Review
Management Responses
_____________________________________________________________________________________
City Auditor’s Office 11 FY15 PMSA Compliance Review
Recommendation
Management
Response August 2015
Management
Response March 2017 Status
11.1 The City Manager should
formally designate a City
representative to act as
a contract administrator
in administering,
monitoring and reporting
on the provisions of the
PMSA.
The City Manager has
designated a City
representative to act as
a contract administrator
in administering,
monitoring and
reporting on the
provisions of the PMSA.
The Contracts
Program Manager,
hired in October 2016,
has now been
assigned the
responsibility of
contract
administration.
Closed
11.2 The City should request
that the Arena Manager
formally designate an
Arena Manager
representative to act as
a contact in
administering, monitoring
and reporting on the
provisions of the PMSA.
The City is working with
a designated Arena
Manager representative
to act as a contact in
administering,
monitoring and
reporting on the
provisions of the PMSA.
Effective July 1, 2015,
AEG Facilities was
selected as the
Arena Manager. The
Arena Manager,
General Manager is
assigned the
responsibility of
contract
administration.
Closed
12.1 The City should establish
controls to ensure that
the R&R account is
funded in accordance
with the PMSA.
The City has established
controls and the R&R is
now being funded on
time.
Same response as
August 2015.
Closed
12.2 The City should establish
review procedures to
ensure that R&R
reimbursement requests
from the Arena Manager
comply with the
requirements of the
PMSA.
The City has worked
and will continue to
work with the Arena
Manager to ensure that
R&R reimbursement
requests from the Arena
Manager comply with
the requirements of the
PMSA.
Same response as
August 2015.
Closed
Appendix A
PMSA Contract Compliance Review
Management Responses
_____________________________________________________________________________________
City Auditor’s Office 12 FY15 PMSA Compliance Review
Recommendation
Management
Response August 2015
Management
Response March 2017 Status
12.3 The City should establish
controls to verify that
capital assets purchased
by the Arena Manager
with the City’s funds
comply with State and
City procurement
requirements and are
approved by City
Council, as required.
The City has worked
and will continue to
work with the Arena
Manager to verify that
capital assets
purchased by the Arena
Manager with the City’s
funds comply with State
and City procurement
requirements and are
approved by City
Council, as required.
Same response as
August 2015.
Closed
12.4 The City should establish
controls to ensure that
Arena assets purchased
with the City’s funds are
adequately tracked and
titles are registered in the
City’s name, as
applicable.
The City has worked
and will continue to
work with the Arena
Manager to establish
controls to ensure that
assets purchased with
the City’s funds are
adequately tracked
and titles are registered
in the City’s name, as
applicable.
The City works with
current Arena
Manager to ensure
assets purchased with
City funds are
adequately tracked
and titles are
registered in the City’s
name, as applicable.
Closed
13.1 The City should notify the
Arena Manager if the
annual and hourly safety
and security fees are not
remitted to the City in
accordance with the
PMSA.
The City will notify the
Ar ena Manager if the
annual and hourly
safety and security fees
are not remitted to the
City in accordance with
the PMSA, by June 30,
2015.
The City will notify the
Arena Manager if the
annual and hourly
safety and security
fees are not remitted
to the City in
accordance with the
Arena Management
agreement.
Closed
13.2 The City should
determine if any amounts
are owed to the Arena
Manager for 2013/2014
Safety and Security fees
and reimburse the Arena
Manager.
The City reconciled the
2014 Safety and Security
fees and reimbursed the
Arena Manager $23,002
on August 7, 2015.
Same response as
August 2015.
Closed
Appendix A
PMSA Contract Compliance Review
Management Responses
_____________________________________________________________________________________
City Auditor’s Office 13 FY15 PMSA Compliance Review
Recommendation
Management
Response August 2015
Management
Response March 2017 Status
13.3 The City should perform
annual reconciliations to
ensure full recovery of
Safety and Security costs,
including overhead,
under the PMSA.
The City will perform
annual reconciliations to
ensure full recovery of
Safety and Security
costs, including
overhead, under the
PMSA by June 30, 2015.
The City’s Finance
Department works
with the Police and
Fire Departments to
ensure all costs are
recovered.
Closed
14.1 The City should notify the
Arena Manager if annual
budgets are not
provided in accordance
with the PMSA.
The fiscal year 2015/2016
annual budget was
provided in accordance
with the PMSA. The City
will notify the Arena
Manager if annual
budgets are not
provided in accordance
with the PMSA.
Same response as
August 2015.
Closed
14.2 The City should request
that the Arena Manager
and the Team Owner
agree upon the standard
of the Team Owner's
review of the Annual
Budget and provide
written notice of that
standard to the City.
The City will work with
the Arena Manager and
the Team Owner to
clarify their
understanding of the
standard of the Team
Owner's review of the
Annual Budget and to
obtain a written notice
of that standard to the
City by September 30,
2015.
Same response as
August 2015.
Closed
15.1 The City should retain
documentation
indicating the date of
receipt of the Arena
Manager’s monthly and
quarterly financial
reports.
The City has begun and
will continue to retain
documentation
indicating the date of
receipt of the Arena
Manager’s monthly and
quarterly financial
reports.
Same response as
August 2015.
Closed
Appendix A
PMSA Contract Compliance Review
Management Responses
_____________________________________________________________________________________
City Auditor’s Office 14 FY15 PMSA Compliance Review
Recommendation
Management
Response August 2015
Management
Response March 2017 Status
15.2 The City should request
that the Arena Manager
submit the monthly and
quarterly financial reports
timely in accordance
with the PMSA.
The City requested that
the Arena Manager
submit the monthly and
quarterly financial
reports timely in
accordance with the
PMSA, by June 30, 2015.
AEG Facilities is
required to submit
monthly and quarterly
financial reports per
the Management
Agreement.
Closed
16.1 The City should request
that the Arena Manager
remit surcharge fees in
accordance with the
PMSA.
In light of the settlement
agreement between the
parties and the
amendment to the
PMSA, this
recommendation is no
longer applicable.
Same response as
August 2015.
Closed
17.1 The City should establish
controls to ensure
insurance certificates are
provided by the Arena
Manager and the Team
Owner in accordance
with the PMSA and retain
documentation to verify
compliance.
The City will establish
controls to ensure
insurance certificates
are provided by the
Arena Manager and the
Team Owner in
accordance with the
PMSA and retain
documentation to verify
compliance, by
September 30, 2015.
Same response as
August 2015.
Closed