Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - Minutes - City Council - Meeting Date: 12/18/1990MINUTES OF THE WORKSHOP SESSION OF THECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFGLENDALE, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA HELD TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1990 AT 3:10 P.M. Mayor Renner called the Workshop Session of the GlendaleCityCounciltoorderintheWorkshopRoom, B-3, in theGlendaleCouncilChambers. Council members present were: Bellah, Huffman, Hugh, Scruggs and Tolby. Member absent: McAllister. Also present were Martin Vanacour, City Manager; GordonL. Pedrow, Assistant City Manager; Peter Van Haren, City Attorney and Linda Ginn, Deputy City Clerk. Hugo Malanga, City Traffic Engineer, introduced Ms. Susan Bookspan, new Transportation Coordinator who will be working on the bicycle system. WORKSHOP SESSION 1. DEER VALLEY LITTLE LEAGUE REQUEST TO USE LIONS PARK Staff: Tim Ernster, Deputy City Manager, Community Services Lee Stanley, Leisure Services Director This is a request to review a proposal from the Deer Valley Little League (DVLL) to operate and maintain the lighted ballfield at Lions Park, 63rd Avenue and Frier Drive. At the direction of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission and City Council, a request for proposal was issued for exclusive use of the Lions Park lighted ballfield. Only one proposal, from DVLL, was received. On November 19, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission discussed the proposal with representatives of DVLL. The primary item of discussion was the exclusive use periods as requested by DVLL and the impact of these seasons on city recreation programs. DVLL requested that they be allowed two seasons annually --February 1 through July 15 and September 5 through December 10. The Recreation staff recommended that there be only the spring season; however, should the field not be needed for a city -sponsored program, DVLL could request to use it for a fall league, as they do now. Staff advised the Commission that this facility is used during the months of June and July for a teen coed slowpitch softball league. As a compromise, DVLL asked to use the M C field until June 15 and either shorten the coed season orextenditintoAugust. The following issues were discussed: 1. The agreement would be for three years with a two-yearrenewaloptionatthecity's pleasure. 2. The outfield fences be temporary installations and wouldberemovedafterDVLL's seasons. A permanent fencewouldrestrictotheruses. 3. A sprinkler system be installed by DVLL to serve the infield, outfield, and all turf and trees within the lease area. 4. DVLL will provide all care and maintenance for the lease area during their use periods. 5. The "small storage shed" scheduled for construction in 1990/91 will be more clearly described in the final agreement. 6. The proposed bleachers scheduled for construction in 1991/92 will be more clearly described in the final agreement. 7. The proposed permanent concession stand/storage building scheduled for 1992/93 be more clearly described in the final agreement. 8. Certification and evidence will be provided showing 80 percent of the youths are Glendale residents. 9. The city will pay up to $4,000 for water and $1,600 electricity during DVLL's use periods. 10. The ballfield lights be turned off each night by 10 p.m. 11. The city and DVLL each contribute $1,000 to a repair fund. At the termination of the agreement, the fund balance will be divided and distributed equally. The commission recommends entering into an agreement with DVLL and that their season be completed by June 1, if a ball facility is not available for the teen coed slowpitch league. Council concurred with the recommendation and directed that this item be placed on a future Council agenda for formal action. 91 2. REVIEW OF DRAFT CITY COUNCIL GOALS FOR FY 1991-92Staff: Ken Martin, Deputy City Manager, ManagementResourcesStaffbriefedCouncilbystatingattheCouncilworkshoponNovember17andDecember11, the Council expressed anumberofgoalsforthenextfiscalyearanddirectedstafftoplacethegoalswithcontinuinggoalsfromthecurrentyeartobereviewedbyCouncil. The attached list of goals for FY 1991-92 includes alloftheareasdiscussedbytheCouncilonNovember27andthechangesrecommendedonDecember11, and lists the on-going goals that could be carried forward into next year. The list also notes if there are new costs, future costs, and if existing or new staff would be required. Mayor Renner suggested setting some priority direction on the goals that have new costs. (See attached). This item is for staff's benefit in preparing the budget for FY 1991-92. 3. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN REVIEW Staff: Ken Martin, Deputy City Manager, Management Resources Scott Lazenby, Budget Director Shirley Medler, Senior Management Assistant Staff briefed Council by stating the City's long range capital improvement plan is based on an average 8% annual growth in property assessed values. The growth rate for this fiscal year is indicated to be zero or less. To continue with the $1.34/$100 secondary property tax rate, a review of projects is necessary. Rather than the $11.5 million scheduled for bond sales over the next two years, budget staff has calculated that the city can afford a $7.3 million general obligation bond sale this year (with no further sales next year) and still remain within the $1.34 secondary rate. The sale of $7.3 million would fund all projects budgeted for this year, including any Council may chose to delay. Bonds already sold for projects (e.g., public safety, parks) are limited to the categories under which they were sold. The long range capital plan does, however, call for new bond sales in most areas, so the city can shift resources from one use to another by making shifts in the amount of bonds sold in each category. For example, according to the existing capital plan, a 1990 bond sale of $7.3 million would include $1,335,000 in street bonds and $1,195,000 in parks 92 bonds. The Council could shift resources from streets toparksbyincreasingthesizeoftheparksbondsale, with acorrespondingdecreaseinthestreetsbondsale. This item is for Council's information and will berevisitedlaterinJanuaryatanotherworkshopsession. 4. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR THE AMERICAN LEGION BLOCKStaff: Jerry Swanson, Deputy City Manager, CommunityDevelopmentGregoryMarek, Acting Economic DevelopmentDirector Staff reported that the City has been approached by American Legion Post No. 29 regarding the redevelopment of the property it owns at the northeast corner of Lamar Road and 58th Avenue in downtown Glendale. The American Legion is proposing a mixed-use development that will include a new building for Legion activities, including conference meeting rooms; approximately 100 elderly housing units; retail uses, and a parking structure. To make this a successful project, the City of Glendale's participation is necessary. The City's participation would include providing the two railroad spur properties that we own, as well as other possbile assistance. This other assistance could be in the form of building fee rebates and providing public parking. If the City is interested in participating in this project, they must designate this area as a redevelopment project and issue a Request for Proposals to be consistent with state redevelopment law. Council concurs with staff's recommendation to issue an RFP and directs that this item be placed on a future Council agenda for formal action. 5. DIAL-A-RIDE SERVICE CHANGES Staff: Tim Ernster, Deputy City Manager, Community Services Bill Budlong, Transit Director Staff reported that during the July 31, 1990, Council Workshop, several recommendations for changes to the Dial-A-Ride operation were presented by the Transportation Commission. Prior to complete action upon these recommendations, staff was requested by Council to pursue a review of the system by a private consultant and to return over the next few months to further discuss the following issues: 1. The Dial-A-Ride operational philosophy. 93 2. A short history of the program. 3. The regular rider needs for service. 4. Changes to the fare structure and tokens. 5. Possible limitations to service. 6. The type of equipment to purchase. It had originally been planned that aoperatorwouldreviewtheprogramatnocost The operator, however, decided that he was not and regrettably withdrew his offer. Staff direction on whether to proceed with hiring a review the program. local privatetotheCity. able to do so is requesting consultant to Councilmember Tolby suggested that since Dial -a -Ride had two pending projects that would impact the study of the system that it might be better if they waited to get these projects on line before hiring a consultant. Council concurred. Staff proceeded to present Council with the philosophy of the Dial -a -Ride and a break down of the ridership for the 00 last fiscal year. Staff said they would like to come back with item numbers 1, 4 and 5 in January and a discussion on item 6 in February. Councilmember Scruggs stated that she felt that the rationale of the Transportation Commission regarding refusing DAR service to patrons who could use fixed -route service being too abrupt was contrary to the philosophy of the Dial -a -Ride system. Mr. Budlong said he would take her concerns back to the Commission for further investigation and discussion. 6. BUS STOP SHELTERS AND AMENITIES Staff: Bill Budlong, Transit Director Janet Davis, Transit Manager The Transportation Commission brought to Council duringtheJuly17, 1990, workshop, a recommendation to allow advertising shelters within the City of Glendale. Council asked the Transportation staff to further research the issue of advertising shelters. The Transportation staff returned during the September 28, 1990, workshop and provided (1) a draft of the Sign Ordinance changes that would be required, (2) a modified recommendation from the Transportation Commission to no longer pursue the advertising shelter program, (3) an in-house team to design alowercostshelter, and (4) a draft passenger amenity siteplan. Staff then presented alternatives to the advertisingshelters. They reported that the current design used by theCityisamasonryshelteroffourposts, with a tile roof andsteelmeshfurniture. The in-house design team modified thissamedesigntobecomeasteelsubstructurewithabrickormasonryfascia. This steel substructure can be prefabricatedandthenmoreeasilyassembledon-site, reducing theconstructioncosts. The estimate received for constructionofthebasicshelterwas $4,700. Depending upon whether the steel mesh furniture or concrete furniture is used inside the shelter, the finished price will range from $6,500 for steel to $5,000 for concrete. A second design was received from a local businessman; Bootz and Duke). The design is very similar to what had previously been used in Glendale for the past ten years. The construction of this design is estimated to be $3,400 as presented. However, a few modifications to better accommodate passengers in wheelchairs and for increased weather protection would be required. Additional costs for both designs would include the regular cleaning, trash removal and maintenance of the shelters. Staff presented funding sources for the proposed 41 alternative shelters and 93 benches with the appropriate landscaping. These included UMTA, developers, ID's, donations and the CIP. Discussion ensued on the funding process. Staff recommended going to UMTA first and see how much they would contribute; (which the city would have to match 20%) and then spread that figure over a two or three year period. After lengthy discussion on the merits of advertising shelters, Council directed that the issue of advertising bus shelters be placed on a future Council agenda for formal action. COUNCIL COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS Mayor Renner commented about the attendance at the Christmas tree lighting ceremony. He said it was the largest one ever and complimented all the volunteers, including the Mayor's Youth Commission, who worked on the celebration. Councilmember Tolby also commented and complimented the banner that was produced by the City's Graphic Department, wishing military personnel in the Mid -East a happy holiday season from Glendale, Arizona. 95 FA I -N lei I J 1There being no further items to come before the Council, the meeting adjourned at 5:20 p.m. Deputy City Clerk Glendale residents of services provided by the City andspecialfacilitiesandamenitiesinGlendale. (ExistingStaff, Possible New Costs) Develop plans, including staff and financial support, for aCentennialcelebrationin1992. (Existing Staff, New Costs) 100 STREETS/TRAFFICVWContinuescallop streets program. (New Costs) Finalize plans for downtown traffic flow and beginimplementationoftheprogramin1991-92. (Existing Staff, New Costs) Finalize plans for transit shelters and begin implementationoftheprogramin1991-92. (Existing Staff, New Costs) Continue implementation of the streetscape program. (NewCosts) CARRYOVER GOALS FROM 1990-91 Improve the appearance of Glendale Avenue from 51st Avenue to the Downtown area. (New Costs) PUBLIC SAFETY Develop a Traffic Management Program to include plans for reducing vehicle speed, specific site improvements for safety, and signal coordination. (Existing Staff, New Costs) 19 Increase crime prevention efforts through additional programs to reduce property loss. Efforts may include code amendments and consultations with property owners to provide improved security. (Existing Staff) Maintain the quality and level of public safety services to citizens. (Possible New Costs, Possible Future Costs) CARRYOVER GOAL FROM 1990-91 Continue Anti-Drug/Anti-Gang programs including the DARE program, graffiti removal program, school cooperation, and special summer programs for youth. (Existing Staff) ADDITIONAL GOALS Review and develop continuing employee relations programs. Existing Staff, Possible New Costs) Develop a program in conjunction with Downtown Development Corporation, Chamber of Commerce and other business groups for improved marketing of City services to inform current and new 99 Develop and adopt a Thunderbird park master plan. (ExistingStaff) Continue and expand the tree planting program. (New Costs) -BImproveparkturfareasandplacemoreemphasisonthemaintenanceandconditionofparkturfareas. Develop a ParkMaintenancePlanforcontinuedon-going maintenance of parkfacilities, turf and landscaping. (New Costs, Future Costs) CARRYOVER GOALS FROM 1990-91 Continue efforts to implement the City's Bicycle Plan. (New Costs) Complete acquisition of land for development of a 9 -hole golf course in the west area of the City. Develop a Request for Proposal for the construction and operation of a golf course on the site. (Existing Staff, New Costs) ENVIRONMENT Continue and expand implementation of recycling programs and identify ways to increase market demand for recyclables. Existing Staff, Possible New Costs) Continue household hazardous waste disposal programs and investigate additional methods for protection of the landfill for hazardous waste materials. (Existing Staff, New Costs) Reexamine water conservation programs and develop more aggressive programs to encourage water conservation. Existing Staff, Possible New Costs) Develop additional educational programs in water conservation and all other environmental areas that will include information on the economic impacts of these programs. Existing Staff) Develop plans for consolidating and centralizing environmental programs in the City to focus efforts in all areas of the environment, including water quality, air quality, waste management and hazardous waste. Develop strategies for legislative action on environmental issues. (Existing Staff) 1991-92 GOALSFLOODCONTROLDevelopstrategiesforfundingadditional flood controlcontrolprojects, including additional bond authorization, grants, and other sources of funds. (New Costs, Future Costs) 19Developeducationalprogramsonfloodpreventiontoinformpropertyownersonhowtheycanprotecttheirproperty. %7ExistingStaff) FINANCIAL Complete review of the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and develop a plan for regular review to include study of long-term costs/benefits on all major capital projects. Existing Staff) ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Explore additional transportation methods for downtown area including investigation and feasibility study of a weekend trolley program. (Existing Staff) Begin efforts to actively seek and assist developers to develop new residential opportunities in the downtown area. Existing Staff) Target specific infill properties for development and focus efforts to attract developers to make investments in them. Existing Staff) Adopt the Economic Development Plan in FY 1991-92. (Existing Staff) Develop a Request for Proposal to redevelop the existing Public Safety building site. Complete and award a contract for the successful proposal. (Existing Staff, Possible New Costs) CARRYOVER GOALS FROM 1990-91 Goal: Build the City's employment and tax base. Continue efforts to attract and develop new hotels in Glendale. (Existing Staff) 97