HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - Minutes - City Council - Meeting Date: 4/17/1990MINUTES OF THE WORKSHOP SESSION OF THECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFGLENDALE, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA HELD TUESDAY, APRIL 17, 1990 AT 3:15 P.M. Mayor Renner called the Workshop Session of the GlendaleCityCounciltoorderintheWorkshopRoom, B-3, in theGlendaleCouncilChambers. Council members present were: Bellah, Huffman, Hugh, McAllister, Scruggs and Tolby. Members Absent: None. Also present were Martin Vanacour, City Manager; GordonL. Pedrow, Assistant City Manager; Peter Van Haren, City
Attorney and Linda Ginn, Deputy City Clerk.
WORKSHOP SESSION
1. ADOT 1991-95 CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
Assistant City Manager Gordon Pedrow and Rosendo
Guiterrez and Larry Langer, representatives from ADOT,
briefed Council on the progress of the state freeway system.
Mr. Pedrow stated that on April 27, the Transportation Board
will conduct it's final public hearing on the tentative
construction program for the next five year period. He
stated that the slowed economy over the past several years
has reduced the funds available for construction and slowed
progress on completing the MAG freeway system which is
primarily financed by the half -cent sales tax.
Staff explained that costs had escalated in some
locations because of having to design the system through
urbanized areas instead of open, vacant areas.
Mr. Pedrow presented Council a graph showing the
projected revenues; 6 billion dollars (circa 1985) and the
1990 projections of only 4 billion from the half -cent sales
tax, illustrating an approximate 2.9 billion shortfall. He
then stated the governmental entities in the MAG region have
spent many hours crafting a compromise program which
continues progress on the major sections of the system while
recognizing the realities of reduced revenue.
He stated that their plan covering 1990-94 consisted of
compromises to the Agua Fria and Pima systems. He explained
the proposed alterations to the plan as they pertain to the
Outer Loop and westside area. He said it was the committee's
feeling that ADOT stretch out their current five year plan to
seven years. He said this would encompass the Agua Fria
completion to I-17 but would not allow for any more right -of
way acquisition from I-10 to Glendale nor for the design and
construction of the interchange at I-10. The overpass on
158-
Grand Avenue at Camelback would also not be constructed butsometrafficservicemanagementimprovementswouldbemade. He further stated that no advance right-of-way acquisitionfortheParadiseCorridorwouldbemade. Mayor Renner thanked Assistant City Manager GordonPedrowforalltheworkandtimehehasputintothefreewayissue. This item is for information only. 2. PUBLIC SAFETY/COURT PROJECT
Staff briefed Council stating that on March 24, 1990,
bids were opened for the Public Safety/Courts Complex. Seven
companies submitted bids and all but one was below the
project's construction budget. The apparent low bidder was
the Sundt Corporation with a total bid of $10,775,750. This
total includes the 8 optional bid items recommended by the
project team. All of the options except alternate #4 were
items requested for separate bidding to allow the architect
and city staff to analyze minor technical variations in
construction materials or equipment.
Bid alternate #4 was included at the request of the City
Council in August, 1989, when design development drawings
were approved. At that time, the architect was directed to
complete construction drawings with the base bid including a
planter in the plaza area. As an alternate bid, a water
feature was to be designed and the water feature reviewed by
the City Council prior to bid award. The Sundt Corporation's
bids for alternate #4 is $66,000. The project team supports
the construction of the water feature.
The project architect presented drawings of the planter
as designed in the base bid as well as the water feature
which is in the alternate bid items. He explained the
mechanics of the fountain stating that it is a dry pump
system with a pre -manufactured shell and a timer which will
require a minimum of maintenance. He further stated that the
loss of water from evaporation would be approximately 23
gallons which figures out to be less than one-half of what a
normal swimming pool loses in one day.
Vice Mayor Tolby registered concern about the
maintenance problems that have been encountered with other
fountains at other city facilities. Staff and the architect
replied that the pump that is proposed is a dry pump as
opposed to a submersible one and has been more successful in
reducing maintenance.
Vice Mayor Tolby also registered his concern that the
City would not be projecting a very good image of water
159-
conservation if they decided to include the water fountain. Staff replied they felt the water loss was minimal and theaestheticqualitythatthefountainwouldlendtothePlazaareaoutweighedanynegativeperceptions. Councilmember Bellah asked about the feasibility of afountainliketheoneatthePhoenixCivicCenterwhichactuallyservestwopurposesofbeingpleasingaetheticallybutalsocoolingthearea. Staff responded that that kind ofafountainwashighwateruseandthatwaswhytheyhadnotrecommendedthatparticulartypeoffountain. CouncilmemberBellahrepliedthathesupportedafountainconceptbutwouldliketosuggestamorepracticaltypeoffountainlikethe
Civic Center; more of a mister system. Staff stated that
this could be investigated but it would involve a redesign
and change order.
Discussion ensued on exploring a different type of
fountain with the general feeling being that they had bid the
type of fountain presented to keep water loss to a minimum
and considerable cost would be involved to refigure for a
different fountain.
This item will be placed on the April 24, City Council
agenda for formal consideration.
3. LANDFILL OPERATIONAL AND FISCAL MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE
Staff summarized this issue by stating that an updated
draft of the Public Works "Landfill Five -Year Operational and
Fiscal Management Plan" is presented by Public Works
following review and concurrence by the Utilities Committee
in its April 2, 1990 meeting. The updated Plan recommends a
re -confirmation of the previously approved Five -Year Landfill
Rate Schedule effective July 1, 1988. The recommended rate
schedule adjustment is an additional $2.00 per ton charge to
20 per ton for commercial users, and a 50 cent increase for
City departments and residents to $7.50 per ton to become
effective July 1, 1990.
The rate adjustment is needed to continue to stabilize
landfill revenue needed for implementation of EPA mandated
environmental regulations now being written, and other major
capital needs, such as land, landscaping, and equipment
purchases for 1990-91.
Council concurred with the plan and recommended placing
this item on a future Council agenda for formal
consideration.
4. STATUS OF TRANSPORTATION PLAN DEVELOPMENT
0X:IIZ
Staff briefed Council by stating on July 25, 1989, Council directed staff to begin a series of communitymeetingstogatherpublicinputontransportationproblemsanddesiredsolutions. This was to be a "grassroots" efforttodevelopalocaltransportationplan. The other valleycitieshavefollowedasimilarcourseandaredevelopingtheirlocalplans, as well. As each city finalizes its localplan, they will be integrated into a regional plan. Thelegislaturewillbeaskedforapprovaltotaketheregionalplantothevotersforapproval. Mr. Budlong, Transit Director, continued that since lastSeptember, 18 public meetings plus two cable television shows
have been conducted in an effort to gather input from
citizens and develop this grassroots transportation plan. A
total of 322 people attended the 18 meetings, an average of
18 per meeting. They represented all areas of Glendale and
all age groups. Twelve of the meetings were for the general
public and six were for special interest groups.
Meetings were divided into three groups. The first
sought public input on the transportation problems requiring
public attention. The second group sought input on the
various solutions to be pursued. The third and final group
asked for public opinion on which of the many possible
solutions would be the preferred actions, i.e., to narrow the
choices to a few preferred options.
As a result, the citizens of Glendale produced the
content of the "Draft Transportation Plan". The draft Plan
is currently being reviewed by the Transportation
Commission. The final stage of the draft plan includes an
opinion survey to determine if there is general support for
the recommendations. The Commission will hold a public
hearing on the Plan at its May 16 regular meeting and then
will forward the Plan to the Council with its
recommendations.
Mr. Budlong said that some of the more interesting
recommendations received were to reduce the amount of parking
offered in developments and to spread the peak traffic hours
i.e. different hours of employment, program hours, etc. He
also said that some suggestions had been received for
disincentives for the automobile along with expansion of the
mass transit so there would be alternatives to the auto. He
said that some of the disincentives would be a higher gas
tax, higher license plate tax and higher charge for parking.
This item will be brought back to Workshop for further
discussion and review.
161-
Mayor Renner complimented Mr. Budlong and theTransportationCommissionfortheirexcellentworkonthedraftplanwhichisbeingusedbyothercommunitiesintheareatoformulatetheirplans. 5. PROPOSED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FOR1990/91Staffbriefed Council by stating during the past severalmonthstheCommunityDevelopmentAdvisoryCommittee, CitystaffandthecitizensofGlendalehaveworkedtogetherinordertodevelopalistofproposedactivitiesandfundinglevelsforthe1990/91 Community Development Block Grant
Program. A public hearing was held before the Advisory
Committee on February 22, 1990, to receive citizen
participation in the application process. A "Proposed
Statement of Community Development Objectives and Projected
Use of Funds" will be published on April 25, 1990. A second
public hearing before the City Council is scheduled for May
8, 1990. The complete application must be submitted to the
Department of Housing and Urban Development on or before May
31, 1990.
Mr. Vern Crow, Chairman of the Community Development
Advisory Committee, stated that the Committee voted not to
lend their suppport to the downtown triangle redevelopment
project and have stated that they prefer the funds be
designated for low -moderate benefit activities.
Mayor Renner asked staff for a clarification on what the
request for funds for the CAP project entailed. Staff
responded that the funds would be used to rehabilitate or
remodel the CAP facility and would give them a lobby on the
street side of the block as opposed to the alley side.
However, staff is currently pursuing moving the CAP office
into the current City Hall in the Human Services department
which would invalidate their request for CDBG funds.
Discussion ensued about what some of the funds requested
for in the contingency fund would be used for. Staff replied
that there were four areas that might need some contingency
funds. They would be the street lighting project, the Senior
Home Repair program, boys and girls club and the Resolution
Trust fund.
Discussion ensued regarding expansion at the Glendale
Youth Center and the use of the requested funds. A
spokesperson for the Youth Center said the money would be
used for both expansion of the facility and programs offered.
Mayor Renner suggested that staff prepare a
recommendation that has monies that have been discussed with
the broadest flexibility for the Youth Center, some money for
162-
the Downtown Triangle and balanced off between thecontingencyfundsothatthetimeframepresentedbystaffcanbemetalongwithallowingfortheCommunityDevelopmentAdvisoryCommitteetimetomeetanddiscusssomeoftheitemsdiscussedtodaybyCouncil. This item will be placed on a future Council agenda forformalconsideration. 6. INTERGOVERNMENTAL REPORTMarionPorch, the Intergovernmental Liaison, briefed theCityCouncilonstateandfederallegislativeissuesand
related matters.
This item is for information only.
COUNCIL COZO ENTS AND SUGGESTIONS
Mayor Renner announced that Glenn Rabinowitz, reporter
for the Glendale Star, is leaving and going to Los Angeles.
Mayor Renner wished him well in his endeavors.
fc • ). I I Y
There being no further items to come before the Council,
the meeting adjourned at 5:45 p.m.
XJ .
Deputy City Clerk
163-