Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - Minutes - City Council - Meeting Date: 5/2/1989MINUTES OF THE WORKSHOP SESSION OF THECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFGLENDALE, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA HELD TUESDAY, MAY 2, 1989 AT 3:10 P.M. Mayor Renner called the Workshop Session of the GlendaleCityCounciltoorderintheWorkshopRoom, B-3, in theGlendaleCouncilChambers. Council members present were: Bellah, Falbo, Huffman, Hugh, McAllister, and Tolby. MembersAbsent: None. Also present were Martin Vanacour, City Manager; GordonL. Pedrow, Assistant City Manager; Peter Van Haren, CityAttorneyandLindaGinn, Deputy City Clerk. Mayor Renner introduced David Barrat and Rene BarstockoftheGLADprogramwhowereinattendance. WORKSHOP SESSION 1. REVITALIZATION RESOURCES FOR FOCUS AREAS City Manager Vanacour stated that for greater efficiency and production, the staff is submitting for review several program changes including a streamlined rehabilitation program for use in an owner -directed rehabilitation project. Other changes will further clarify the homeowner's responsibility as an applicant for public funds for rehabilitation. Paul Ludwick, Neighborhood Resources Director, stated on March 28th, the Council approved the expansion of the revitalization programs to designated neighborhood focus areas. Enhancement focus areas are designated by the Neighborhood Enhancement staff only after a few of the neighbors have requested designation. Staff would like to propose that the criteria for a further designation as revitalization focus areas be that neighbors request revitalization assistance and agree to participate in their own self-help projects. The residential rehabilitation program in these areas would be less extensive as the housing stock is newer. This new program would be used in addition to the current levels of technical assistance. The proposed new streamlined procedure would require that the homeowner be responsible for preparation of blueprints, or plans; seek contractor bids from the Division's approved contractor list and essentially serve as project manager of the rehabilitation project. Staff would continue to prepare the work write-up, see to procedural loan closings and review all requests for disbursements. Site inspections for adherence to construction conformance will not be eliminated. 16- Mr. Ludwick further stated that staff has also preparedarevisedOwner's Certification and Agreement. This newdocumentispatternedcloselyafterfederalloandocumentsandwouldclearlyandcompletelycovertheresponsibilityofanapplicanttotheCityintheuseofrehabilitationfunds. Concerns were registered about rehabilitating a homethatwasnotofsufficientvaluetomerittherehabilitation. Staff replied that their specifications have been made morestringentandtheywerecurrentlyrehabilitatinghomesthatwouldhavelongereconomiclifeasopposedtoolderdeterioratinghomes. Council also suggested that a thirdpartybeappointedasaliaisonbetweentheCityandthehomeownertoassurethatallresponsibilitiesofeacharemet. This item will be placed on a future Council agenda forformalconsideration. NAMES FOR CITY PARKS Lee Stanley, Leisure Services Director, stated this is a request to review names that have been submitted for the park sites at 63rd Avenue and Thunderbird Road and 59th Avenue and Union Hills Road. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission invited the public to submit names for the two sites, and sixteen individuals submitted names for consideration. On March 13, the Commission voted unanimously to recommend that the site at 63rd Avenue and Thunderbird Road be named Festiva or Sportsman, and the site at 59th Avenue and Union Hills be named Foothills or Tranquility. Discussion ensued and the general consensus was that Council liked Foothills for the 59th Avenue and Union Hills park site but would prefer a name that indicated the location and somewhat of the type of activity that would take place at the 63rd Avenue and Thunderbird park site. This item will be placed on a future Workshop agenda for further discussion. 3. REZONING APPLICATION Z-88-30: NORTH SIDE OF GLENDALE AVENUE BETWEEN 83RD AVENUE AND 91ST AVENUE Jerry Swanson, Deputy City Manager, Community Development, gave a brief summary of the rezoning request and stated there were three property owners involved. Mr. Bob Coons, Planning Director, further detailed the proposal by stating this is a request to rezone 280 acres from A-1 to PAD. The applicant proposes to develop the site with a mixed use Planned Area Development including 239 acres 17- of residential uses, 19 acres of shopping center, 8 acres ofoffice, a 4 -acre public safety site, an 18 -acrepark/retention/school site, and 4 acres of additionalretentionarea. The proposal is in conformance with the land uses anddensitiesestablishedinthenewGeneralPlan. A maximum of973dwellingunitswouldbeallowedonthispropertyinaccordancewiththeGeneralPlan. The proposed PAD requestcontains956units. Detailed development information willneedtobesubmittedandapprovedpriortosubsequentdevelopmentplanorpreliminaryplatapprovalsofanyportionoftheproperty. At the April 6, 1989 Planning and Zoning Commissionmeeting, two neighbors spoke in opposition to the request. Their primary concerns were the location of future roadways and the possible conflict of higher density residential uses adjacent to rural land uses. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the request, subject to seven stipulations. Stipulation No. 1 has been modified because the applicant has already addressed these concerns in a revised Development Plan Map dated April 25, 1989. Concern regarding street alignment and improvement and responsibility of funding was registered by two property owners in the area. Councilman McAllister voiced his displeasure with the proposed 5,000 square foot lots and adequate size park sites. Council also received a letter from a Peoria School Board member stating the Board's dissatisfaction with the proposed plan. Overall consensus of the Council was that this plan needs some more revision before it's brought to a regular Council meeting. This item will be placed on a future workshop agenda for further discussion. 4. INTERGOVERNMENTAL REPORT Marion Porch, the Intergovernmental Liaison, briefed the City Council on various legislative issues. This is for information only. COUNCIL COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS None. L IBM 11918RAWWAThere being no further items, the meeting adjourned at4:35 P.M. Deputy City Clerk 19-