Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - Minutes - City Council - Meeting Date: 6/21/1987MINUTES OF THE WORKSHOP SESSION OF THECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFGLENDALE, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA HELD TUESDAY, JULY 21, 1987, AT 2:30 P.M. Mayor Renner called to order the Workshop Session of GlendaleCityCouncilinConferenceRoomB-3 of the Council Chambers. Council members present were: Bellah, Huffman, Tolby, FalboandHugh. Members Absent: Heatwole. CONSENT AGENDANONPROFITEVENT - FEES AND PERMIT APPROVALOnanannualbasis, the City Council considers 12 paradepermits. Other permits for solicitations, carnivals, circuses, and recreation facility reservations are handledadministratively. A nonprofit group contemplating an eventinGlendalemayhavetomeetwitheightdifferentofficesas well as plan ahead for scheduling on Council agenda. Staff suggests the consistent procedures be established for nonprofit events including one application, which would be routed to all appropriate city offices for review, and administrative approval of all permits within Council -approved parameters. No change in approval of recreation permits is recommended because the City Council has already dealt with that subject separately. Councilman Falbo asked on recommendation 3a and b should be and instead of or. Mr. Sharp said they would do that. Councilman Falbo asked why IRS documentation was not mentioned in the ordinance. Mr. Sharp stated some organization may not have IRS status or nonprofit status with the state and for that reason they had not planned on requiring the status. Councilman Falbo stated he felt there should be some consistency on the IRS status and all are treated the same. City Attorney Pete Van Haren stated he felt the application was not clear and it should be reworded "IRS Status if available". This item will be placed on a regular agenda for council action. CONTRACT CUSTODIAL SERVICES PROPOSAL In recent budget discussions various members of the City Council and City Management team indicated an interest in exploring contract private services as an alternative to various services provided by the City. The intent of comparing the cost of public versus private services is to ascertain that the most cost effective means are used by theCityincontinuingtoprovideawidearrayofpublicservices. Councilman Bellah asked if the current cost considersadditionalinsurancerequirementsorworkmenscomprequirements. Mr. Martinsen stated the only additionalinsurancewouldbewhatthecontractorwouldhavetosupply. Councilman Bellah asked if this would effect currentemployees. Mr. Martinsen stated this would not affect any ofthecurrentemployees. Councilman Bellah asked if additional supervisory staff wouldberequired. Mr. Martin stated they are planning on usingcurrentsupervisorstolookaftercontractor. Councilman Falbo stated he felt the concept was a good one but asked about building which might not be staffed such as water treatment plant. Mr. Martinsen stated he agreed it might be a potential problem and would try to schedule custodial work at the time the plant is staffed and if that was not possible there would be no contract. Councilman Falbo asked about "confidential areas". Mr. Martinsen stated they would consider this but confidential materials are locked up. Mayor Renner asked if the services would be monitored. Mr. Martinsen stated it would be appropriate. This item is for information only, no council action is required. WORKSHOP AGENDA LOCKBOX PROCESSING FOR MUNICIPAL SERVICES BILL Since October 1983, the City of Glendale has been using lockbox services provided through a contract with Sun Country, a division of Valley National Bank. Such services provide an automated method of processing payments from City customers to their municipal services bill. The current contract has expired and is on a month-to-month extension. Earlier this year, the City Council reviewed the request for proposals for lockbox operation and authorized development of these proposals. The Finance Department prepared the in-house proposal but City Auditor evaluated the proposals. The City was required to meet the same specifications and time deadlines as the outside firms. Staff recommends contracting the Valley National Bank. Mike Moore, City Auditor, gave a brief presentation. Councilman Bellah stated according to the cost analysis thebankwouldpay $92,000 a year + $10,000 and asked how much itwouldcosttocitytodothisservice. Mr. Moore stated118,000 would be the total cost to do in-house. Mayor Renner asked if this was a one year contract. Mr. Sharp stated this was correct with an option of two one yearextensions. Councilman Falbo suggested tracking the float time with theBank. Mr. Moore stated they would but the bank estimates athreedaytime. This item will be placed on a regular agenda for councilaction. CITY HALL SPACE PLANNING During its workshop of September 2, 1986, the City Council reviewed preliminary sketches showing recommended changes in use of office space in city hall, including the third floor. The goal of these changes was to provide improved citizen and customer service (particularly on the second floor), increase staff efficiency, and reduce the future cost of office layout changes. Staff was directed to prepare more detailed layout plans. A working group was formed, and has completed a 10 -year master plan for space use. The plan covers immediate changes, proposed changes for 1988-89, and options for responding to growth in the next ten years. Scott Lazenby, Management and Budget Research Director, gave a brief presentation. Councilman Bellah asked why not combine phase I and II and move the Finance Department at that time. Mr. Lazenby stated that is being considered but do not have the detailed plans for this phase. Councilman Bellah stated he felt it was more economical and efficient to get it all done at once. Mayor Renner asked if any fixed walls or partitions would be relocated. Mr. Lazenby stated it was minimal; conference room A and lobby. Councilman Bellah asked what the additional operational costs would be. Mr. Lazenby stated air conditioning has always been maintained so he did not feel there would be an additional cost. Mayor Renner asked if it was possible to have the architecttolookatanalternatetodesignphaseIandIItogether. Mr. Lazenby stated he would do that. Mayor Renner stated he felt it was a good idea for the credituniongoingtothelibrary. Councilman Bellah stated he felttheemployeewouldbetakingtomuchtime. Mr. VanacourexplainedtheCreditUnionwasnotacitybranchbutafederalcreditunionwhoservedmanyemployers. Mayor Renner asked why the credit union did not move in phaseI. Mr. Lazenby stated changes for Velma Teague had not beendecidedonyet. This item will come back to workshop with updatedinformation. METRO NORTHWEST 69KV FACILITY SITING STUDY The metro northwest 69KV facility siting study is being conducted by APS to locate 69KV substations and 69KV transmission line corridors in the north Glendale area. The two proposed corridors include Bell Road from 75th Avenue to 59th Avenue and three basic alternatives within Arrowhead Ranch from the vicinity of 75th Avenue and Beardsley Road to the existing Skunk Creek Substation, 55th Avenue south of Beardsley, APS established a Glendale Advisory Committee to work with the consulting firm of Dames and Moore in completing the environmental assessment of the proposed corridor alternatives. A representative of the Glendale Advisory Committee is in attendance to review the Committee's recommendations regarding the power line corridors. There have been two public meetings in north Glendale with regard to this study. The most recent meeting in June was attended by approximately 50 residents, primarily from Arrowhead Ranch. The Glendale Advisory Committee will meet again in August to review the alternative routes in preparation for Dames and Moore's final recommendation to Arizona Public Service regarding the power line corridors and substation sites. Ray Jacobs, Planner, gave a brief presentation. Elaine Scruggs, Chairman of the Airport Commission, reported on the technical study the commission did. Mayor Renner asked what kind of structure is a 69KV hung on. Mr. Jacobs stated the alternatives are wood or metal and APS recommends metal. Mayor Renner asked what the committee would be considering at the August meeting. Ms. Scruggs said the agenda is to take priority ranking which have been developed, the information received from citizens, and other information gathered and to decided on recommendation. Councilman Bellah asked what staff has done to research theundergroundingissue. Mr. Vanacour stated it was technicallyfeasiblebutthecostis5or6timesmorewhichtheCitywouldhavetopay. Councilman Bellah stated he felt there should be a middleroadwithcostsharingpossibilities. Jim Blanton, Arizona Public Service, stated Scottsdale did astudyandtheirresultswere $750,000 a mile. Councilman Tolby asked what the cost of an overhead linewas. Mr. Blanton stated a mile of 69KV is $60-70,000. Mayor Renner asked if it was possible to favor the BeardsleyRoadchoiceandvigorouslypursuethepossibilityofundergroundingwithexpandedlegislationwiththeformation of an improvement district. Mr. Swanson stated they would like to form council policy regarding location to these facilities, whether they should be underground or above ground, and what financial mechanism should be considered to implement the plan. Mayor Renner stated the Council would be reluctant to make any final decisions until the committee has completed their work. Mayor Renner asked how large of a facility was a substation. Mr. Blanton responded a little over an acre of land is needed. Councilman Falbo stated he agreed with waiting for the committee. Councilman Bellah asked how many miles for this one. Mr. Blanton said five miles. Councilman Bellah stated this would be unsightly forever and the City should consider contributing $2 or $300,000 per mile just so the lines will not be above ground. Mrs. Scruggs commented if the City could work with SRP it would be the best solution and feels the improvements district is not the best way because when people find out they have to pay money they change their minds. This item will be brought back for further discussion. REZONING APPLICATION Z-87-07: NORTHEAST CORNER OF 59TH AVENUE AND CACTUS ROAD (MARSHALL RANCH) Bob Spaulding gave a brief presentation. Ray Jacobs, Project Manager, updated the Council on the project. Councilman Tolby asked if a gaited community was considered aloss. Mr. Spaulding stated with the school question in theneighborhooditwastodifficulttomaintainasagaitedcommunity. Councilman Tolby asked if a decision can be obtain by theschooldistrict. Mr. Spaulding stated they are activelypursuingtheproperty. Councilman Tolby asked if there would be a bridge across thecanal. Mr. Jacobs stated the canal would be bridged and havepedestrianaccess. Councilman Falbo asked if there would be a 3 acre parksiteavailable. Mr. Jacobs said the neighborhood park would be at54thandSweetwateralongwiththerecreationalfacilitiesoftheThunderbirdPaseo, this would not have a traditional neighborhood park. Councilman Tolby asked who would supply the maintenance for the green belt. Mr. Jacobs stated the home owners association would maintain. Councilman Tolby asked if SRP could water instead of the City. Mr. Jacobs stated that was a detail that would be worked out later. Councilman Tolby suggested in building the bridge over the canal the police department should be included in the planning. This item will be placed on a regular agenda for council action. Intergovernmental Report Marion Porch briefed the Council on legislative issues. David Iwanski briefed the Council on Plan 6. Adjournment There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 5:05 p.m. Deputy City Clerk