HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - Minutes - City Council - Meeting Date: 5/1/2012 (5) .
MINUTES
CITY OF GLENDALE AD HOC CITIZEN TASK FORCE
ON WATER AND SEWER
PALO VERDE ROOM
ADULT CENTER
5970 W. BROWN STREET
GLENDALE,ARIZONA 85301
TUESDAY, MAY 1, 2012
6:00 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 6 p.m. by Michael Ashcraft, facilitator. He reviewed the
schedule and gave a brief explanation of the events planned for the evening.
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE APRIL 30, 2012 MEETING Sally Melling, Sr. Secretary
for Water Services, asked for approval of the Summary Minutes from the Task Force.
Mike Ashcraft asked members for their input and concerns on the previous night's meeting.
Several concerns noted prior were addressed by the start of tonight's meeting such as a second
microphone being made available.
Craig Johnson, P.E., Executive Director, Water Services Department first provided information
requested from Task Force members at the April 30 meeting. Commissioner Rod Williams
requested financial information for the department. Craig asked what their preferred method
would be to receive the financial information that was requested. The majority of the members
wanted it sent by email/Internet access. Several members requested that a printed copy be
mailed to them. They were asked to give their names & information to Kern Logan.
He then answered Commissioner Livingston's question on the purchasing process. City
departments purchase products and services in 3 ways: Water Services uses the Engineering
Depailment for Capital Improvement Plan projects if purchasing professional services (under
ARS §34-603), we work through the Purchasing Dept., and use pro-cards. The city's Purchasing
Department provides services, commodities, and purchases such as chemicals, by using
cooperative agreements with sister cities, and piggy backing on their bids. Council has approved
working under those cooperative agreements. For purchases over $50,000, Council approval
must be requested at the evening Council meetings. If purchases are between $5K-50K, three
quotes must be obtained by putting the bids out to the public. The Purchasing Dept. assists in
this process also. For amounts up to $5,000, city credit cards are used for daily purchases. Craig
stated that members will be sent a link to the Purchasing Dept. website showing the purchasing
procedures. The question was asked if there was information to compare Glendale's financial
info to comparable sized cities. Craig stated that all cities publish it as public information and it
• May 1, 2012
Ad Hoc Citizen Task Force on Water and Sewer Minutes
Page 2
is available on the Web. Purchasing water is separate process that will be discussed in further
detail at Meeting #4 during Doug Kukino's presentation.
ENVIRONMENTAL SCAN & FACILITATED EXERCISE
Michael Ashcraft walked members through the timeline of the City of Glendale from 1892 when
it was established to present day, discussing water service topics and population growth.
Task Force members participated in an exercise to determine the growth and development of the
community by being fast-forwarded to Glendale in the year 2032.
Craig Johnson shared his history with the members and a quick overview of the Water Services
Department.
"LIQUID ASSETS"AWWA VIDEO
Craig presented a 16-minute video with the Task Force and discussed the national importance of
water and sewer infrastructure in relation to the City of Glendale water and sewer systems. He
gave the members an overview and tie-in information to the department, giving facts and figures
for each division specifically and the department as an Enterprise Fund in general. He discussed
conservation and water recharging, and assured water supply and how supply meets peak
demand of 65M gallons per day (g/d). Water is tracked daily and accounted for. He stated that
Glendale's unaccounted for water figure is below the national average of 10%, Glendale sits at
7%. The infrastructure is out of sight, out of mind but it is monitored constantly. The irrigation
system of roughly 23 miles is old and in need of repairs. The rate structure will also be
discussed.
A TF member asked what percentage of sewage is sent to the 91st Avenue/SROG plant for
treatment. Craig explained that Glendale's part ownership portion of SROG is 13.2M g/d. We
send 1/3 that amount daily for treatment or 4.4M g/d.
The question was asked: What can enterprise funds be used for, just for water and sewer
services or other things? Craig replied that the fund money is under the control of the city
manager to be used as he determines it is needed. Water Service has primary ownership of that
money but it belongs to the city once it's brought in. More information on this subject will be
presented during the Financial presentation (Meeting#9 on September 17).
Another question asked was: What is the service life of pipes? Average is 28-30 years. Craig
replied that we are okay right now. Since he's been with the city (1997), many miles of pipes
have been replaced. He stated that we are missing complete records for approximately 100-140
miles of older pipes but we know exactly where they are located. Those pipes are monitored and
are being worked on; and have not caused any issues yet.
The break out exercise was conducted to report those issues that TF members are focused on and
should be particularly addressed by staff during the upcoming presentations. Each table was
asked to present up to three topics of importance for that group. Commissioner Livingston
May 1, 2012
Ad Hoc Citizen Task Force on Water and Sewer Minutes
Page 3
voiced concern that some topics would be overshadowed by others deemed more important to
the group. Michael Ashcraft assured the members that all information would be captured as
presented.
Each group presented their three top items. All topics, including secondary items that were not
designated as top interest, were captured by staff. The top topics of interest as prioritized by the
TF members in a blue/red dot exercise were: Complete Planning of System/ Infrastructure;
Strive for Long-term Sustainability through education/conservation; Identify a community with
higher standard of benchmarking; Are we appropriately situated for growth? (New technology);
Consumer rate costs vs. city production costs?; Economics of Water; $Money$-Rate structures,
how is the money managed, and what is the impact of the current budget situation and where is it
leading; and Costs-Financial planning and disclosure, and understanding cost application/billing
procedures/and accountability. These will be addressed in subsequent meetings.
Members were asked to wear comfortable walking shoes on the tour and invited to ask for any
information needed to get to the tour site.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned the meeting at 8:40 p.m.
The next meeting scheduled is the tour of Pyramid Peak Water Treatment Plant, the Water
Quality Lab, and Conservation and Sustainable Living presentation, on May 12, 2012.
Respectfully submitted,
Sally ening, Record' Secretary