Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - Minutes - Community Development Advisory Commission - Meeting Date: 1/18/2012 MINUTES CITY OF GLENDALE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE PUBLIC HEARING #3 GLENDALE MUNICIPAL COMPLEX COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5850 W. GLENDALE AVENUE GLENDALE,ARIZONA Wednesday,January 18,2012 Council Chambers 6:30 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Madelin Page, Chair Sharon Wixon Pattie Johnston Glenn O'Bannon Shirley Wong Randy Miller Chris Flippen John Torres Richard Schwartz Gina Schmitz Arthur Swander, Jr. MEMBERS ABSENT: Karen Mankoski, Vice-Chair STAFF PRESENT: Gilbert Lopez, Revitalization Administrator Mona Francis, Revitalization Supervisor Jim Colson, Deputy City Manager Elizabeth Garcia, Revitalization Coordinator Beth Coughenour, Senior Secretary I. Call to Order Chair Page called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. II. Roll Call Chair Page took roll call and the Committee-members introduced themselves. III. Approval of Minutes—January 4, 2012 1 Committee-member O'Bannon commented that the date on the top of the minutes should be changed from"January 4, 2011"to "January 4, 2012." Committee-member Miller motioned to approve the January 4, 2012 minutes with the date on page one in the header amended from "January 4, 2011" to "January 4, 2012." Committee-member O'Bannon made the second. The motion carried 11 —0. IV. Public Comment Chair Page opened the floor to public comment. No comments were made. The floor was closed to public comment. V. Fiscal Year (FY)2012-13 Community Block Development Grant (CDBG) Physical Improvements, HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME), and Emergency Shelter Grants (ESG) Funding Requests Chair Page explained that this was the last of the public hearings for the agencies that submitted CDBG Physical Improvements, HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME), and Emergency Shelter Grants (ESG) Funding Requests. Presentations are limited to four minutes each. Committee-members may ask questions and there will be no time limit on this question and answer period. Chair Page noted that there will be fourteen (14) funding requests presented this evening. Upon review of the applications, the Committee will make final recommendations to Mayor and Council for consideration and approval in the spring. Mr. Colson thanked the Committee-members for their dedication and commitment to the hearing process. Mr. Colson also thanked the agency representatives for their participation in the process and their good works in the City of Glendale and the valley. Mr. Colson noted that the economy is still very challenging and many people are in need of assistance during these difficult times. Mr. Lopez also thanked the Committee-members and agency representatives in attendance. Mr. Lopez announced that, on an estimated basis, for the CDBG Physical Improvements, there are $1,385,214 in grant requests with $784,348 available in funds, for the HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME), there are $669,622 in requests with $452,988 in available funds, and for the Emergency Shelter Grants (ESG) there are $140,212 in requests with $92,809 in available funds. Mr. Lopez commented that these figures have been adjusted for two applications that were withdrawn: The City of Glendale Parks and Recreation Department for a Physical Improvement Grant and A Bridge to Independent Living (ABIL) for a HOME Grant. [Committee-member Torres entered the meeting.] PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENTS —HOUSING RELATED 2-1 A Bridge to Independent Livin (gABIL)—Glendale Home Accessibility Program $44,340 request 2 Mr. Darrel Christensen thanked the Committee for its past support of the agency and commented that the agency has had a sixteen-year relationship with the City of Glendale. Mr. Christensen provided the following highlights of the funding request: • The request will be used for ten (10) home modification projects for seniors or disabled residents in the City of Glendale. • ABIL utilizes licensed and bonded contractors and closely oversees the work being performed. • ABIL only utilizes a 12% administrative cost. • Last year, ABIL had a goal of 22 modifications and 24 were completed. • The agency is very good at stretching its dollars. • ABIL partners with all of the long-term care providers and Maricopa and Pinal County. • ABIL has received over 800 referrals from ALLTEC. • ABIL coordinates and/or provides other services for its clients such as financial management, home safety and peer mentoring. Committee-member Miller inquired about the rehab of rental properties and wondered what happened to the modification materials if and when a renter moves out. Mr. Christensen explained that ABIL must obtain consent from a landlord prior to modifying a rental unit. Mr. Christensen added that the landlords do receive a benefit from the modifications as they make the units rentable to others with a disability. Mr. Christensen stated that there is a waiting list for accessible housing and the landlords are happy to fill this demand. Committee-member Miller inquired as to the verification of income. Mr. Christensen replied that ABIL requires a social security statement or letter and bank statements for verification. Committee-member Miller commented that there appears to be outreach to women- and minority-owned businesses by ABIL, but no outreach to veteran-owned businesses in the ABIL materials. Mr. Christensen replied that the agency has not had a chance to recruit new contractors as the amount of work for the projects has shrunk along with funding. Committee-member Swander, Jr. stated that it appears that the majority of funds were obtained via grants and wondered if ABIL had other funding sources besides grants. Mr. Christensen replied in the negative. Committee-member Flippen inquired as to the percentage of overhead as compared to the budget provided. Mr. Christensen replied that the percentage of administrative costs have not changed over the years, it is proportional to the budget. Chair Page thanked Mr. Christensen for his presentation. 2-2 City of Glendale Community Housing Division—Roof Replacements and 3 Associated Repairs for the Three (3) Public Housing Projects: $182,000 request Ms. Elaine Adamczyk, of the City of Glendale, explained that the goal of public housing is to provide safe, decent, sanitary and affordable housing to low-income families. Ms. Adamczyk stressed that all previous funds received from the CDBG grants have been well-spent. Ms. Adamczyk announced that there are 155 public housing units in three complexes in the City of Glendale. Ms. Adamczyk added that the good condition of the units is due to the ongoing improvements and consistent maintenance of the properties. Ms. Adamczyk stated that in the 2010 Fiscal Year, the division received $1,600 per unit, per year from HUD Capital Improvements. In the 2011 Fiscal Year, this figure was cut to $1,300. Ms. Adamczyk expected an eight to nine percent decrease for the 2012 Fiscal Year and explained that these continued cuts are the reason the division is requesting CDBG funds. Ms. Adamczyk stated that the funds will be used to remove the current shingles on the roofs, remove all fascia boards, remove inoperable swamp coolers and replace the roofs. Ms. Adamczyk stated that 13 years ago, the EVAP systems were replaced with air conditioners; however, at that time the Division did not have the funds to remove the swamp coolers from the roofs and repair the roofs after removal. At this time, the roofs need to be redone and it would be an efficient time to remove the swamp coolers as well. Ms. Adamczyk announced that the division has been deemed a High Performer by HUD due to its fiscal responsibility and excellence in providing assistance to Glendale families who would otherwise be homeless or living in sub-standard housing. Ms. Adamczyk noted that the division houses 378 individuals, of which 187 are children under 18 years of age. Furthermore, 79% of the families consist of the elderly, disabled or working poor. Committee-member Miller noted that there are 30-to-50-year shingles available on the market and wondered why the project is utilizing 15-year shingles. Ms. Adamczyk replied that 30-to-50-year shingles may be able to be negotiated during the bidding process. Ms. Adamczyk provided pictures of the public housing units and examples of the roofs and swamp coolers in the project. Committee-member Miller wondered if the swamp coolers would be recycled. Ms. Adamczyk replied in the positive. Committee-member Flippen inquired as to the age of the roofs. Ms. Adamczyk explained that the Cholla Vista roofs are the oldest at16 years and the other two complexes had roof replacements in the early 2000's. 4 Committee-member Flippen wondered what the Division would do with any recovery cost on the scrap of the swamp coolers. Ms. Adamczyk replied that any funds would go back into the project. Chair Page thanked Ms. Adamczyk for her presentation. 2-3 Valleylife, Inc. —Upgrade/Renovate Three (3)Residential Group Homes: $189,000 request Ms. Julie Shaver stated that Valleylife was established 67years ago in the valley. Ms. Shaver commented that last fiscal year, the agency received 15% less in state funding which equaled $1.8 million in decreased funding. Ms. Shaver commented that the agenda for the meeting states the request is for the renovation of three group homes; however, it is actually for ten group homes. Ms. Shaver noted the requested funds will be used to renovate two bathrooms to ADA standards and to reduce energy costs in the homes via the installation of dual pane windows and new doors. Furthermore, APS grants will be used to install solar hot water heaters and other energy saving devices. Ms. Shaver noted that these types of green renovations were done in two other homes and the energy costs were lowered by 9.7% or $420 annually per home. Ms. Shaver stated that the funding request is for material and labor only and does not include administrative costs. Chair Page inquired as to the population serviced. Ms. Shaver replied that there are 83,000 developmentally challenged individuals in Arizona and the states takes care of only 30,000. A variety of agencies take care of many more individuals but there are still 17,000 on a waiting list to be served. Chair Page inquired as to how the $189,000 estimate for the projects was obtained. Ms. Shaver stated that project designs were drawn and were sent to a contractor for a bid estimate. Ms. Shaver stated that the bathrooms were estimated at $26,000 and there were 18 windows at a cost of$1,000 each. Committee-member Flippen noted that last fiscal year, the agency received a $90,000 grant of which only $63,000 was spent so far. Ms. Shaver explained that these funds were for two homes which require the relocation of residents in order to complete the renovations. Ms. Shaver stated that the City of Peoria is finishing a group home project at this time and once this is completed, Ms. Shaver can move her clients into this group home while the other two homes are being renovated. Ms. Shaver stated that it is dangerous for the low-to-severely mentally retarded individuals to be living in a home during a renovation. Committee-member Flippen noted that the project as presented includes exterior home painting and stated that the City of Glendale does coordinate volunteer painting projects 5 for low-income individuals. Ms. Shaver was unaware of that program but will research the suggestion. Committee-member Flippen commented that only one-third of the existing grant funds have been spent and the agency is now asking for more funding. Committee-member Flippen asked for assurances that any new funds would be spent in a timely manner. Ms. Shaver stated that the outstanding project would be completed by April of 2012 and that any new funds would be spent timely. Committee-member Miller commented that there are three homes listed in the application requiring a bathroom renovation, but only two homes were mentioned earlier in the presentation. Ms. Shaver stated that the initial application was incorrect and only the home on 57th Avenue and the home on Evans require bathroom renovations, but the home on Brown does not. Committee-member Flippen inquired as to how many clients live in one home. Ms. Shaver replied that it is usually five to six but can be less depending on how many are in wheelchairs. Committee-member Schwartz noted that only one contractor provided a bid. Ms. Shaver explained that only one contractor was used for a bid for the grant application, however, when the project begins, there will be a competitive bidding process. Chair Page thanked Ms. Shaver for her presentation. PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENTS —PUBLIC FACILITIES 2-4 Central Arizona Shelter Services (CASS)—Emergency Shelter and Program Improvements: $24,874 request Mr. Mark Holleran, CEO of CASS, stated that the $24,874 request would be used to replace the commercial washer and dryer at the downtown facility which are used to wash linens and towels. Mr. Holleran stated that with 450 men and women at the shelter and over 300 nightly at the overflow facility, the washers and dryers are run constantly. Mr. Holleran stated that the units are approximately six years old, but due to the constant use, the repairmen have suggested new units should be replaced instead of repeatedly repaired. Committee-member Schwartz wondered if new units would save on energy costs and Mr. Holleran replied in the positive. Chair Page wondered if the Committee could take a tour of the downtown facility sometime in the near future and Mr. Holleran replied in the positive. Committee-member Flippen commented that the request is only for half of the replacement cost as the agency is requesting the other half from the City of Chandler. 6 Committee-member Flippen commented that the project budget also denotes scrap funds to be recouped. Committee-member Flippen inquired if the units are still serviceable. Mr. Holleran stated that the scrap figure was based on the expected sale of parts. Committee-member Flippen wondered how often the units were used. Mr. Holleran replied that three cycles a day were done which consists of 40 loads. Mr. Holleran commented that units were pretty much used twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week. Chair Page thanked Mr. Holleran for his presentation. 2-5 City of Glendale Code Compliance Department—Identification and Elimination of Code Violations Creating Unsafe Slum& Blighting Conditions: $75,000 request Mr. Sam McAllen, Code Compliance Director, stated that the goal of the Department is to eliminate slum and blight and to provide proactive enforcement of code through resident cooperation and/or the Clean and Lien program. Mr. McAllen noted that the work of the Department falls in line with Council priorities of keeping neighborhoods safe and stable. Mr. McAllen gave a presentation on the Department, which included the following highlights: • Employees inspect the neighborhoods street-by-street and also respond to calls reporting violations. • The department helps to protect the investment of homeowners and neighborhoods through the mitigation of trash, debris, graffiti, infestations, broken windows and doors and a variety of other issues. • The department encourages voluntary compliance and 98% of offenders do comply. • The Clean and Lien Program is supported by state law. • For the Clean and Lien Program, there is a 30-day resolution period after notice is given to the homeowner. After this period, the department can correct the violations and put on a lien on the property in order to re-coup the costs incurred during resolution of the violations. • Regular property maintenance appears to be diminishing due to the economy, foreclosures and short sales. • In the FY 2005-06r, there were 162 vacant property cases and in the FY 2010-11, there were 1,900 vacant property cases. • In the first six months of FY 2011-12, there were 135 Clean and Lien cases which cost$25,000. • The department is not staffed to handle all of the calls received in a timely manner. • Last year, the funds received from the CDBG grant awarded paid for 3,300 inspector hours and 139 Clean and Liens. • For the last fiscal year, 60% of the Clean and Liens were reimbursed by the property owners and/or banks and the funds were put back into the program. 7 Committee-member Miller commented that he recently attended an Ocotillo District meeting at which various homeowners complained about issues with Code Enforcement. Committee-member Miller wondered if there are plans for additional or upgraded training of staff. Mr. McAllen noted that all of the staff has gone through additional training since the Ocotillo meeting. Committee-member Swander, Jr. inquired as to how the requested funds would be utilized. Mr. McAllen explained that the funds would be used for the Clean and Lien Program as well as funding the salary of a part-time inspector. Chair Page asked if the Code Enforcement Department handles the alleyways. Mr. McAllen commented that the Public Works Department handles the alleyways. Chair Page thanked Mr. McAllen for his presentation. 2-6 City of Glendale Economic Development Department—Visual Improvement Program (VIP): $250,000 Mr. Robert Lamb presented the request for the City of Glendale VIP, which included the following highlights: • The VIP is a successful tool used in improving business properties located in Glendale's Centerline area, which stretches from 43rd Avenue to 67th Avenue and Ocotillo to Myrtle. The Centerline improvement is one of the main priorities of City Council. • The funds and projects are scheduled on a first come, first served basis. • Projects include signage, exterior repair and extension of premises, landscaping, painting and building redesign. • Investment in the Centerline can increase jobs, increase visitors to the area and decrease graffiti as community pride increases. • A recent change to the state law now disallows the use of the city's General Funds for use in the VIP Program. • Of the $250,000 in requested funds, $133,000 is for projects already in the process of coming to fruition and the other funds will be for new projects requested during the fiscal year. Committee-member Johnston wondered how city staff attracted investors and business owners to the VIP Program. Mr. Lamb explained that word is spread to the Centerline business owners as some of these owners do not have enough funds to bring their buildings up to code or to upgrade their signage. Mr. Lamb also noted that the VIP Program is a key tool which is highlighted to prospective business purchasers. Mr. Lamb distributed photos of projects in the VIP Program. Committee-member Miller commented that some of the projects in the photos were presented at last year's CDBG hearings. Mr. Lamb explained that at that time, the projects were just beginning, and now they have been completed. 8 Committee-member Flippen read a staff comment included on the agency's application regarding grant funds not being spent as quickly as anticipated. Mr. Lamb explained that interest by private investors in businesses slowed down due to the economy and that sometimes an owner wants to move forward with a project, but at the last minute, changes their mind for a variety of reasons. Mr. Lamb anticipated that the funds requested this evening would be under contract by July or August 2012 based on the interest he is receiving from property owners at this time. Committee-member Flippen wondered if staff focused on specific areas or businesses in the Centerline. Mr. Lamb explained that business owners do contact staff about the VIP Program and also staff reaches out to businesses as well. Committee-member Schwartz inquired as to the number of 1,670 people served as indicated in the application. Mr. Lamb explained that this was the number of individuals in the VIP outreach, not the actual served. Committee-member Flippen expressed concern regarding the staff comments for the lengthy amount of time for project funds to be utilized. Mr. Lamb stated that the funds are not spent until the contract is finalized and there can be some delays due to the owners or the owner's attorneys or contractors or design issues. Committee-member O'Bannon inquired as to how many business owners choose to move forward in the VIP Program. Mr. Lamb stated that approximately 50% of the businesses do not move forward after early inquiries. Committee-member O'Bannon wondered if there would be a savings on staff time if the non-committed businesses were weeded out earlier in the process. Mr. Lamb explained that he cannot know how committed an owner is until further along in the process but Mr. Lamb does remain conscious of his time spent. Chair Page thanked Mr. Lamb for his presentation. 2-7 City of Glendale Field Operations—Street Reconstruction Paving: $490,000 Ms. Michelle Woytenko, of the City of Glendale, presented the request for grant funds to be used in street reconstruction and paving of seven distinct segments of low-moderate income neighborhoods. The streets in the proposed project include West Tuckey Lane, North 65th Avenue, West Sierra Vista and West McLellan. The reconstruction would return the streets to new condition. Ms. Woytenko stated that the funds requested would be used for contractor costs and not for staff time. Committee-member Flippen commented that the roads are a fundamental function of a city and wondered why these roads have not been repaired with the use of city funds. Committee-member Flippen wondered why the city has not been able to adhere to its regular streets maintenance and paving schedule. Ms. Woytenko explained that there is a systemic street maintenance program, however, as the city becomes older, the streets require more than just re-surfacing and there has been decreased funds due to the 9 economy. Ms. Woytenko added that localized repairs are done, but after many years these types of repairs do not abate serious issues with the streets. Committee-member Flippen expressed deep concern regarding the lack of street maintenance by the city and wondered if this was a funding issue or a priority issue. Ms. Woytenko explained that for a while the city was growing so rapidly that funds were spent on building new streets and some of the older streets were maintained with localized repairs which are no longer adequate. Chair Page thanked Ms. Woytenko for her presentation. 2-8 City of Glendale Neighborhood Partnerships—Historic East Catlin Court Neighborhood Streetscape Improvements— $200,000 Mr. Matt Cohrs, Neighborhood Partnerships Administrator, provided details regarding the funding request, including the following: • The funds will be used for neighborhood streetscape improvements including new sidewalks, landscaping, and the removal and replacement of roll curbs. • The funds will be used for materials and contractor mobilization fees. • East Catlin Court Neighborhood is in a low-to-moderate income census tract, is in the downtown Glendale area and adjacent to Landmark Elementary School. • The residents of the East Catlin Court Neighborhood have been very active in their community and in working in partnership with city staff to improve their neighborhood. The residents work in partnership with the Vineyard Church as well. • The neighborhood has developed a Neighborhood Improvement Master Plan to guide all future improvement projects which allows for consistency and vision throughout the community. • Aesthetic improvements in a neighborhood are motivating, create community pride and create actual revitalization. • Because the neighborhood is adjacent to the downtown area, there are many visitors who come through the neighborhood during city events. It is very important for this area to be aesthetically appealing as a cornerstone of pride for the city. • This funding request is in line with the Council's goal of One Community with Strong Neighborhoods. Committee-member Flippen wondered if the project could be broken into phases if the Committee would not be able to fully fund the request. Mr. Cohrs replied in the positive. Chair Page thanked Mr. Cohrs for his presentation. EMERGENCY SHELTER GRANTS (ESG) 3-1 A New Leaf, Inc. —Faith House Emergency Shelter Operations: $55,000 request Ms. Rosalie Hernandez, Lead Service Coordinator of the Faith House, gave a presentation on the agency and the grant request which included the following highlights: 10 • Faith House was the first domestic violence shelter in the valley. • Faith House was established over 25 years ago. • Approximately five years ago, Faith House merged with A New Leaf. • Faith House is an emergency shelter provides domestic violence services such as crisis intervention, case management, life skills, support groups, educational classes, on-site child care, referrals and transition services. • Faith House would not be successful without volunteers or program donors. • The agency is requesting $55,000 of a total budget of$687,355 from the City of Glendale. Ms. Hernandez thanked the Committee for its past support and hoped that the partnership with the City of Glendale would continue. Chair Page thanked Ms. Hernandez for her presentation. 3-2 Central Arizona Shelter Services (CASS)—Emergency Shelter Services for Homeless Single Adults: $40,000 request Mr. Holleran noted that at the downtown Phoenix facility, approximately 18% of adults serviced historically state prior residency in the City of Glendale. Mr. Holleran stated that therefore, approximately 77 beds each night at the downtown Phoenix shelter are utilized by prior citizens of Glendale and the agency is asking for $40,000 for the next fiscal year to serve this population. Mr. Holleran noted that this request does not include any individuals served at the Overflow Shelter and at the Family Shelter in Sunnyslope. Committee-member Flippen wondered if Mr. Holleran has seen any abatement in the homeless population. Mr. Holleran stated that he is seeing many new homeless groups, which is most disturbing. Mr. Holleran commented that sometimes there are up to 1,500 at one time at the downtown Phoenix Emergency Shelter, however, the Shelter cannot house more than 1,000 men and women. Mr. Holleran stated that three years ago, there were 160 individuals in the 18-to-25 year-old range and for last fiscal year, there were 600 individuals served in that age range. Mr. Holleran felt very strongly that the 18-to-25 year-old range could be helped, if they are focused on intensely. Mr. Holleran commented that some of the very older homeless are harder to turn around but there is a great chance the younger homeless can be helped through a variety of services. Mr. Holleran commented that services to veterans across the board appear to be getting better and he has seen a slight dip in veteran homelessness. Mr. Holleran also noted that the agency is working with partners to complete three apartment complexes to serve the homeless population at a very low rent cost and Mr. Holleran was very encouraged by those projects. Chair Page thanked Mr. Holleran for his presentation. 11 3-3 Homeward Bound—Utilities Assistance for the Thunderbirds Family Village— Glendale: $20,316 request(revised from $26,316) Ms. Dawn Bogart, Development Director, appreciated the City's past support of the program and commented that the agency purchased its first home in Glendale back in 1994. Ms. Bogart provided various program facts, including the following: • The program serves victims of domestic violence and homelessness. • There are 75 scattered sites and a five-acre campus with 80 apartment units, a social services building and a licensed childcare facility. At the five-acre campus, 32 of the 333 individuals served were previously from Glendale. • The amount requested has been changed from $26,316 to $20,316 due to a miscalculation in utilities allocations on the application. • Success is achieved through the program and last year, eight individuals purchased homes of which two were purchased in Glendale. Ms. Bogart apologized for the miscalculation on the application, but wanted to make sure that the agency requested funds according to the proper calculations. Chair Page thanked Ms. Bogart for her presentation. 3-4 UMOM New Day Centers, Inc. - Emergency Shelter for Families—Glendale: $18,896 request Ms. Karen Fletcher, Chief Development Officer, thanked the Committee and the City of Glendale for the past grant funds received. Ms. Fletcher's presentation included the following: • The agency has been experiencing requests from families as never before. • UMOM defines a family as one adult and one child, which can include even situations such as one grandparent and one grandchild. • As of December 2011, there were still 220 families on the waiting list. The previous year's waiting list averaged 50 to 60 families. • The agency has implemented a housing barrier assessment to help clients determine why they are homeless. • The agency introduced a veteran program and is the first shelter in the country to house veterans in a transitional program. • The agency's priority is families living on the streets. There is a West Phoenix shelter for overflow. • 70-to-75 clients claim prior residency in Glendale. Committee-member Flippen inquired about the $5,000 in other supplies and materials as indicated on the budget. Ms. Fletcher explained that this would be for the many items with which a family is supplied when coming to UMOM such as clothing, linens, 12 cleaning supplies, meals and school clothing. Ms. Fletcher stated that most families come to UMOM with only the clothes they are wearing. Chair Page thanked Ms. Fletcher for her presentation. HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS (HOME) 4-2 Habitat for Humanity Central Arizona—Infill Acquisition and Renovation- $425,000 request Mr. Roger Schwierjohn thanked the Committee for the opportunity to present the grant application and stated that the request was for funding the acquisition and partial renovation of five homes in Glendale. Mr. Schwierjohn's presentation included the following information: • The homeowners in the program make 30% to 60% of median income and are very hard workers. • The homeowners cannot obtain conventional financing. • Volunteer labor is used on the home renovations. • The homes are completed via community involvement. Mr. Schwierjohn noted that Habitat For Humanity has completed 835 homes in the valley and 68 are in the City of Glendale. Mr. Schwierjohn stated that Habitat For Humanity is the leading LEEDS builder in the valley and this has been achieved through the use of the following: • 14-SEER air conditioning units • R38 insulation • New, insulated duct work utilized for the HVAC • Energy efficient doors and windows • Replacement of old wiring • All homes brought up to code Habitat For Humanity is proud of its achievements and partnership with the City of Glendale. Committee-member Flippen wondered if acquisition costs were increasing. Mr. Schwierjohn stated that there are still many areas with affordable price points; however, some areas are inching upward. Committee-member Flippen wondered if the agency would focus on specific areas of Glendale or individual opportunities. Mr. Schwierjohn explained that both methods are utilized by the agency. Chair Page thanked Mr. Schwierjohn for his presentation. 13 4-3 Newtown Community Development Corporation—Affordable Housing= $250,000 request Mr. Jonathan Peiffer, Director of Housing Development, gave the presentation on Newtown agency, which included the following highlights: • The agency purchases and rehabilitates homes. The agency is requesting $250,000 to achieve this goal. • The typical Newtown client is at 60% of adjusted median income. • The land-trust model is utilized to provide affordable housing. • There have not been any Newtown homes that have gone through foreclosure. • All home buyers must complete homeowner education and counseling prior to purchase. Committee-member Miller wondered if housing counseling costs were charged to the clients. Mr. Peiffer replied that these costs were not currently charged to the homebuyer and at the time of closing, the bank pays for those fees. Chair Page thanked Mr. Peiffer for his presentation. VI. Adjournment Committee-member Miller motioned to adjourn the meeting at 8:19 p.m. Committee-member Flippen made the second. The motion passed 11 —0. Respectfully Submitted, • 0 til _ Denise Kazmierczak Recording Secretary 14