HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgendas - City Council - Meeting Date: 1/18/2011 Ruh
P E
GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL WO ' SHOP SESSION
Council Chambers—Workshop Room
5850 West Glendale Avenue
January 18, 2011
1:30 p.m.
WORKSHOP SESSION
1. FY 2011 GENE' * LF D OPE TING BUDGET UPDATE AND FY 2012
GENE' ' LF DOPE' TING BUDGET ST' TEGY— 30 MINUTES
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
This report allows the City Manager to update the City Council about issues raised
by the public during Business from the Floor at previous Council meetings or to
provide Council with a response to inquiries raised at previous meetings by Council
members. The City Council may only acknowledge the contents to this report and is
prohibited by state law from discussing or acting on any of the items presented by
the City Manager since they are not itemized on the Council Workshop Agenda.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
1. LEGAL TTERS
A. The City Co cil will meet with the City Attorney for legal advice, discussion and
consultation regarding the city's position in pending and contemplated litigation,
including settlement discussions conducted in order to avoid or resolve litigation.
(A.R.S. § 38-431.03 (A)(3)(4))
2. LEGAL MATTERS—PROPERTY & CONTRACTS
A. Discussion and consultation 'th the City Attorney and City Manager to receive an
update, consider its position and provide instruction and direction to the City Attorney
and City Manager regarding parking agre- ents relating to Westgate, which are the
subject of negotiations. (A.R.S. § 38-431.03 (A)(3)(4))
Upon a public majority vote of a quorum of the City Council,the Council may hold an executive session,which will not be
open to the public,regarding any item listed on the agenda but only for the following purposes:
(i) discussion or consideration of personnel matters(A.R.S.§38-431.03(A)(1));
(ii) discussion or consideration of records exempt by law from public inspection(A.R.S.§38-431.03(A)(2));
(iii) discussion or consultation for legal advice with the city's attorneys(A.R.S.§38-431.03 (A)(3));
(iv) discussion or consultation with the city's attorneys regarding the city's position regarding contracts
that are the subject of negotiations, in pending or contemplated litigation, or in settlement discussions
conducted in order to avoid or resolve litigation(A.R.S.§38-431.03(A)(4));
(v) discussion or consultation with designated representatives of the city in order to consider its position
and instruct its representatives regarding negotiations with employee organizations(A.R.S. §38-431.03
(A)(5)); or
(vi) discussing or consulting with designated representatives of the city in order to consider its position and
instruct its representatives regarding negotiations for the purchase, sale or lease of real property
(A.R.S.§38-431.03(A)(7)).
Confidentiality Requirements Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.03 (C)(D): Any person receiving executive session
information pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.02 shall not disclose that information except to the Attorney General
or County Attorne3, by agreement of the City Council, or as otherwise ordered by a court of competent
jurisdiction.
CITY OF GLENDALE
GP
. E Council Communication
Workshop Agenda
01/18/2011
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Ed Beasley, City Manager
PRESENTED BY: Sherry M. Schurha er, Management & Budget Director
SUBJECT: FY 2011 GENE ' F F D OPE ' a TING BUDGET
UPDATE AND FY 2012 GENE ' L L FUND OPE ' TING
TING
BUDGET ST a TEGY
Purpose
• This is an update for City Co cil about the economy and the FY 2011 General F d (GF)
operating budget through the first five months. This is also a confirmation of the strategy for
balancing the GF operating budget for FY 2012 and beyond as the economy gradually
recovers and returns to robust health.
Council Strategic Goals or Key Objectives Addressed
• co s strategic goals continue to serve as the fo dation for the development of the city's
• ual budget regardless of whether the economy is growing or contracting. Vision,
i ovation, partnerships, and dedicated employees continue to play a central role in making
the city's efforts successful in areas of key importance to the Mayor and Co cil.
Background
Economic Update
• According to a September 2010 a ouncement from the National Bureau of Economic
Research (NBER), the recession officially ended in June 2009, 18 months after it began in
December 2007.
• The NBER defines a recession as "a significant decline in economic activity spread across the
economy, lasting more than a few months, normally visible in real gross domestic product,
real income, employment, industrial production, and wholesale-retail sales." According to
the NBER, the end of the recession is defined as "the end of the declining phase and the s .
of the rising phase of the economic cycle."
• NBER is the nation's leading private, nonprofit, nonpartisan research org. 'zation dedicated
to economic research and has been operating since 1920. It has been der contract with the
U. S. Department of Co erce for many decades and is well-kno for providing start and
end dates for recessions in the United States.
• The consensus among experts on the Arizona economy such as Elliott Pollack, Marshall Vest
(University of Arizona), and Lee McPheters (Arizona State University) is that the worst of
the recession's impact is past us although the return to no al and healthy economic growth
11 take time.
• Recovery is expected to be gradual and occur over an extended period of time. It is important
to recognize that economic recoveries frequently are marked by occasional eve ess, with
stretches of growth sporadically inte pted by elements of decline, although the long-term
trend is toward growth and a return to no al economic capacity. Further, significant
improvement in the unemployment rate is a lagging indicator so economic experts expect that
measure to decline slowly over a longer period of time.
• According to the Arizona experts on the economy, recovery across the state relies on business
growth, business investment and population growth, the traditional drivers of economic
growth in Arizona, as well as a clearing of the excess inventory of vacant homes.
Budget Strategy
• Given that economic recovery is expected to occur gradually over time, the budget strategy
that was presented to Co cil as part of the FY 2011 GF operating budget remains in place.
This strategy will take us through the next few fiscal years as the economy strengthens til
we see sustained gro in retail sales, income taxes and other critical revenue sources.
Further, this strategy was affirmed by the public through a series of extensive public meetings
that occurred last spring.
• The budget strategy is built around a strategic, business-based and phased approach. This
strategy sustains core city services that serve the co ity, as defined by Co cil, ensures
the smooth operation of the overall org. 'zation and minimizes, to the extent possible,
impacting other services provided to the co unity.
• One element of this budget strategy is the city's Innovate Initiative. This initiative is directly
tied to the budget process and the city's strategic business model. Employees have been, and
continue to be, actively engaged in making business-based reco endations for adjustments
that help us prepare a balanced budget. Some adjustments will result in expenditure savings
while others, through changes in process or structure, result in efficiencies not c ently
captured. Yet other adjustments will result in new or improved revenue streams for the GF.
• ile this budget strategy is designed to adapt operations to constrained resources, it also
positions the city to be ready for the time when the economy is fully recovered.
• Other steps have positioned Glendale to be more successful than other cities. These
measures include the cooperative efforts we have witnessed across the Glendale organization
such as voluntary employee efforts and other i ovative expenditure management measures.
Glendale was the only valley city to adopt this approach in FY 2010, including adjustments to
represented labor agreements. Additional expenditure management measures include the
following:
o Progr. s that were not paying for themselves or achieving targeted contribution rates
were eliminated or reduced;
o Services for which demand had diminished, or future demand was not anticipated, were
eliminated;
o Hours of operations for some facilities were adjusted to better match demand for service;
o Activities offered by other organizations in the comm ity were eliminated; and
o Vacancies have been and continue to be carefully evaluated to determine if they must be
filled.
• Revenue enhancements also have been pursued such as new agreements for electronic
marquees and revised agreements for the placement of cell phone towers on city property.
Additional ex. ples of revenue enhancements include the folio 'rig:
o Implementation of Fire Department inspection fees, premi parking fees for do to
special events and transaction fees for pa shops and second-hand stores; and
o Implementation of a tax . esty progrthat resulted in an additional $1.3 million in
revenue with 618 taxpayers participating.
• In addition, Glendale has remained at the forefront in bringing high quality economic
development to the city. In FY 2010, the City's efforts resulted in 1,776 jobs (includes both
new jobs and the expansion/retention of jobs). Through the first half of FY 2011 the City's
efforts resulted in an additional 710 jobs (includes both new jobs and the expansion/retention
of jobs).
• It is important to recognize that a municipality is a service organization. Therefore,
continuation of the phased budget strategy is appropriate as it takes us through a series of
steps that are designed to attain a fiscally responsible budget while not severely diminishing
the valuable services we provide to the co ity.
• The outlook for FY 2012 requires continuation of the realig ent of resources based on the
business needs of the co unity and the level of resources we can afford. This means we
must continue to adjust our delivery system to match the peak demand times for services. We
are also continuing the review of the useful life of all equipment and capital assets by
extending their service life as long as efficiency of service delivery would not be affected.
The intent of these steps is to sustain the city's core services that serve the co 'ty and
ensure smooth operation of the overall organization while we continue to strategically
manage our way through this c ent economic do t
• The long-term outlook requires continuation of strategic investments in business delivery
systems and reali: ent of functions that enable us to be responsive when the economy fully
recovers. Some strategic investments that have s . ed and will continue include the
folio 'ng:
o Upgrade of the city's tax and license technology system that will reduce manual
processing of tax and license filings, simplify and shorten transaction times for
customers, improve the t around time for management reporting and improve revenue
recovery efforts. The new system is expected to be in operation during the spring of
2011.
o Realig ent of f ctions within the city to reposition programs based on the needs of the
co ity and based on the recognition that some progr. s '11 continue to be provided
by non-profits and/or the private sector.
Previous Council/Staff Actions
• The first quarter report on the FY 2011 GF operating budget was presented to Co cil at the
November 16, 2010 workshop.
Community Benefit
• Glendale's budget is an impo t financial, pl. ing and public co ication tool. It
gives residents and businesses a clear and concrete view of the city's direction for public
services, operations and capital facilities and equipment. It also provides the co unity with
a better unders ding of the city's ongoing needs for stable revenue sources to fund public
services, ongoing operations and capital facilities and equipment.
• The budget provides Co cil, residents and businesses with a means to evaluate the city's
financial stability,
Public Input
• The budget strategy was presented to the public through comm ity- 'de public meetings on
the proposed progr. and service adjustments for FY 2011, These meetings occ ed on
March 3, 4, and 8, 2010. A doc ent s marizing the proposed progr. and service
adjustments was posted publicly in advance of the meetings.
• The public also was given the opportunity to provide feedback on the proposed program and
service adjustments through the city's website and a telephone hotline, both of which were
available through the close of business on March 11, 2010. A total of 200 responses were
received plus 52 citizens spoke at the public meetings. Overall, the public affi ed the
budget strategy.
• All budget workshops are open to the public and are posted publicly according to state
statutes.
Policy Guidance
Today's workshop is for information only. Decisions on the FY 2012 budget will not be
requested til the budget workshops are held in March and April 2011.