HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - Minutes - Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission - Meeting Date: 3/13/2006CITY OF GLENDALE,ARIZONA
APPROVED MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION
HELD MONDAY,MARCH 13,2006
GLENDALE MUNICIPAL OFFICE COMPLEX,ROOM B-3
5850 WEST GLENDALE AVENUE
The meeting was called to order at approximately 7:05p.m. by Chairperson Ted Hansen,
with Commissioners Chuck Jared, Michael Socaciu, Ruben Gutierrez, Raymond Kultala,
Stanley Long, Sarah Berry, and Lori Harding. Representing city staff was Gloria
Santiago-Espino, Becky Benna, RJ Cardin, Shirley Medler, Roger Boyer, and Clyde
Brown.
Citizens were also in attendance.
Chairperson Hansen read the mission of the Parks and Recreation Commission.
The purpose of the Parks and Recreation Commission is to advise the City
Council on policies, rules, and regulations referring to planning, acquisition,
deposition, operations, use, care and maintenance of parks and recreation
facilities. The Commission is also responsible for development of a continuous
master plan for the city parks system and its recreation programs.
Approval of Minutes
Chairperson Hansen had the following corrections to the February 13, 2006, minutes:
Public Comments: Please insert that the American Youth Soccer Organization will hold
its annual soccer tournament at Sahuaro Ranch Park and the Glendale Community
College fields. This year"it will be held the first weekend in March and ..."
Thunderbird Conservation Park: Insert paragraph 3. Ms. Benna stated staff was
reviewing current utilization of existing parking lots. She indicated the preliminary
master plan proposed to remove some of the parking along the wash and relocated them.
One observation determined that the north parking lot (between 59th
and
67th Avenues) is
not heavily used. Others, such as H3, 67th
Avenue, and 55th Avenue and Pinnacle Peak
parking lot are well used.
Page 4, Public Comment: Please add the speakers' addresses. In this case Mr. Mike
Rupp, Mr. Larry Clark, Mr. Dale Woods, and Mr. Allan DeFranco. Also, a comment by
Mr. Clark should be added. Mr. Clark stated there were unobtrusive methods for park
education could include interpretive boards and that these would be more cost effective.
In Mr. Dale Woods' comments: Please add "combined" survey results the most
Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes
March 13, 2006
Page 2
requested issue ...
In Mr. DeFranco's comments please add ...unneeded and dangerous. He said the lighting
in the culvert might affect wildlife using the culvert. He stated concerns about how
access could be provided to emergency vehicles. He said the Audubon Society has found
39 species in the sedimentation basin area.
On page 7: Add Chairperson Hansen noted that the equestrian trail on the west side of
51st Avenue between Greenway Road and Cactus Road was being upgraded. Staff
indicated the upgrades were being completed as part of a neighborhood grant.
A motion was made by Commissioner Socaciu to accept the minutes as amended.
Commissioner Kultala seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously.
Public Comments
Chairperson Hansen asked for comments from the public. He added the Commission
may not discuss items that are not on tonight's agenda. This time is for those citizens to
comment on items not on the agenda. If an audience member would like to comment on
an agenda item, that person will be given the opportunity to comment after the
Commission hears that particular agenda item.
Mr. Allan DeFranco, Glendale, AZ, thanked the Commission for allowing him to speak
this evening. He stated he would refer to the Thunderbird Conservation Park as TCP. He
said he is grateful that this item has been on the agenda for the past few months. The
preliminary master plan process has a very important purpose. To keep TCP a very
unique park and unique, something that the city of Glendale is always striving for in
everything that they do as we are not Phoenix, Tempe, Mesa or any other city. He felt
that most everyone in the room can attest to that. He appreciates the time and effort that
the Parks staff has given as well as the members of the Commission. However, he
believes now is the time to change the hat. TCP needs to be looked at differently. This is
a conservation park and is unique. He will not go into the lengthy definition of a
conservation park as he felt all in attendance have heard it many times. He asked if
anyone knew how unique TCP is. He said there is no other conservation park throughout
the entire valley. He felt this was unique and it needs to be preserved, protected, valued,
but don't destroy it. When the park is gone, it is gone whether it's one acre or one
hundred. He reminded the Commission it took thousands of years for what is now
appreciated. He quoted artist Joannie Mitchell, The Yellow Taxi. "They paved paradise
and put up a parking lot with a pink hotel, a boutique, and a swinging hot spot. Don't it
always seem to go, that you don't know what you've got `til it's gone. They paved
paradise, paved paradise and put up a parking lot. This evening's presentation by the
Parks and Recreation Department is of great interest for all who use TCP. Are they really
listening to the public and have they made modifications to the master plan. Many of us
do not understand how this happened in the first place which began in January 2004. He
Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes
March 13, 2006
Page 3
recapped each public meeting for those in attendance. He said those in attendance
repeated for a year for the park to be left as it is. Do we have to remind everyone here
today about the organization"Save the Park"and why it was started? He said here we are
today looking at destroying the park. He wanted to know if he was missing something
with this picture. He was unsure. He said one would think with all the public outcry of
the
59th
Avenue road issue regarding the destruction of the park, staff would have come
up with an alternative based on what they were hearing. Even when the preliminary
master plan was brought forth, there should have been some modifications. That seemed
logical to him. He said you asked for comments and concerns and why have you not
listened. He hopes he will be able to sit back during the presentation and feel better about
the process. Please consider about not comparing TCP to another park. Just because it
works over there does not mean it will work at TCP.
Commissioner Socaciu clarified that public comment being heard currently should be for
items not on the agenda.
Chairperson Hansen stated that was the purpose of this time.
Commissioner Socaciu said people will have the opportunity to discuss items on the
agenda as they appear.
Chairperson Hansen stated that this time is for those wishing to comment on non-agenda
items. He said he would prefer to defer those comments until the particular agenda item
is heard although he does not wish to discourage anyone from speaking.
Commissioner Socaciu stated if this is the case each person will have two opportunities,
totaling ten minutes, to speak to their particular concern thus making a very long meeting.
He stated this time of the meeting is for citizens to speak to items not on the agenda.
Chairperson Hansen felt it made sense to him and asked if a motion needed to be made.
He asked staff for guidance.
Ms. Benny stated that any public comments not on the agenda can be heard by the
Commissioners, but cannot be addressed during the meeting. Ms. Benny stated that staff
can obtain legal guidance regarding public comment guidelines and return with
information for the Commission at the next meeting.
Commissioner Gutierrez stated it would be more efficient for speakers to voice their
concerns or comments after their particular agenda item of interest is addressed by the
Commission.
Chairperson Hansen stated he did not want to shortchange speakers and have them speak
only 1-1/2 minutes each time they have the opportunity.
Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes
March 13, 2006
Page 4
Commissioner Socaciu clarified that his intention is not to limit public comment.
Chairperson Hansen stated at the City Council meetings there are two different speaker
cards available to the audience. He explained the purpose of the different colored speaker
cards. One allows the opportunity to speak to a specific agenda item while the other
indicates a person is interested in speaking on an item not on the agenda. He said the
Parks and Recreation Commission meetings only have one speaker card available. He
thought they might want to take the City Council speaker card idea into consideration.
Chairperson Hansen asked that any individuals wishing to speak to non-agenda items,
please speak at this time.
No audience members were interested in speaking on non-agenda items.
III. COMMISSION GOAL TIMELINES
Chairperson Hansen called for this item.
Ms. Benny suggested that the Commission move this item to the end of the agenda as
there were many in attendance for item#5.
The Commission agreed.
IV. REVIEW AND DISCUSS JOINT TOUR WITH COMMISSION ON
NEIGHBORHOODS AND PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
Ms. Benny suggested this item be moved to the end of the agenda as well.
The Commission agreed.
V. THUNDERBIRD CONSERVATION PARK MASTER PLAN (TCP)
Chairperson Hansen explained that the TCP preliminary master plan was voted on at the
Parks and Recreation Commission June 2004 meeting. Also at that time, the completion
of the design process for 59th
Avenue Road improvement was being conducted, so the
TCP process was delayed until that road project design was completed. In the fall 2005,
the TCP draft preliminary master plan item was brought back before the Commission and
the public for additional opportunities to provide more input. Each Parks and Recreation
Commission meeting since that time has discussed information for the public to review
and provide comments. He indicated that surveys also were conducted. This meeting is
also to allow citizens the opportunity to provide comments as well as for staff to provide
citizens accurate and up-to-date information regarding the master plan. This is for
Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes
March 13, 2006
Page 5
discussion purposes only. He thanked the interested citizens for attending.
Parks and Recreation Director Ms. Benna began her presentation regarding updates on
Thunderbird Conservation Park (TCP). The presentation overview explained the action
steps that have occurred since September 2005, which were to collect additional public
input and park information. She stated the staff conducted an on-site user survey during
the months of September and October in 2005; the draft preliminary master plan was
presented to the City Commission on Persons with Disabilities for review and comment;
additional on-site meetings were held at Thunderbird Conservation Park with park
rangers and maintenance staff to review the plan and to discuss ideas about the use of the
park; periodic observations of parking lot use in the park were conducted from the end of
the month of November through December 2005; the Commission and staff toured TCP
and other parks to view design and park elements; staff met on site with police and ranger
staff and several residents to discuss the 59th Avenue culvert area and contacted other
organizations that utilize culverts for trail connection; site tours of the park were
conducted with the Arizona Game and Fish Department; additional evaluation of the
sedimentation basin was also being completed; and meetings are being held with school
representatives regarding the interest in park use. Ms. Benna stated staff also continues to
solicit public input and provide updates to the Commission at its monthly meetings.
The 751 on-site user surveys that were collected in the fall 2005 indicated the most
popular use was the trails. Ms. Benna reviewed where the trails are located in the park.
She stated there are 12 designated trails, which means they are assigned a trail
designation. She reviewed each trail and its length. She identified 10 undesignated trails
for the Commission. These trails are also referred to as social trails and not assigned as
official trails,but have been created informally by users of the park.
Ms. Benna indicated through periodic observations of current parking lot use from
November through December 2005, it was found that parking lots K (located off of 67th
Avenue), 55th
and Pinnacle Peak parking lot, A (parking lot located at H-3 trail head) and
F (located at south end of wash located west of
59th
Avenue) are consistently utilized and
at times have been filled or exceeded capacity. Also, it was observed that other parking
lots such as B (located at northeast end of the park between 67th
and
59th Avenues), J
located in the northwestern portion of the park between 67th and 59th Avenues, and G
located at the north end of the wash between 67th and 59th Avenue) were used on a
limited basis. She suggested that directional signage and locations of trailheads should be
considered to maximize use of parking lots.
Understanding the trail use and locations are important since the trails are one of the
major use components of TCP.
Ms. Benna asked Parks and Recreation Project Coordinator Roger Boyer to provide an
update regarding the TCP trail maintenance program. Mr. Boyer stated that the Parks and
Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes
March 13, 2006
Page 6
Recreation Depai lment is receiving trail maintenance assistance from the Arizona State
Parks Department and the Federal Highway Administration Recreational Trails Program
through the American Conservation Experience group. He said there is a supervised trail
maintenance crew that is helping to repair the use and wear on the trails. The intent is to
improve the trails to meet state and national trail standards which include things, such as
having sufficient width for multi-use path users to pass safely along the trails and
removing the obstructions that create trip and fall hazards. Also being installed along the
trails are water deflection areas, which will move water off the trails as soon as possible
so that the water will not wash away the natural soil and leave rock trails again. The trail
maintenance crew includes international representatives from Korea, Belgium, Holland,
Germany, England, Japan and Canada. They work a 4/10 schedule, Tuesday through
Friday. The Trail Assistance program will continue for approximately 12 more weeks or
until it becomes too warm to work. The crews have completed about one mile of trail and
are beginning preliminary work on another 1.5 miles. They have divided the park into
three work zones. They are working on trails between 67th Avenue and
59th
Avenue
presently. A second zone is north of Pinnacle Peak and the third zone is east of 59th
Avenue. Staff has posted a public comment notebook at the trailhead where work is
being completed to record public reaction to this trail maintenance program. Mr. Cardin
provided the Commission with the locations and the length of time these notebooks have
been available to the public and he indicated over 90%were favorable comments.
Ms. Benny then presented what staff has learned over the past several months as a result
of collecting additional public input and park information: 1) Limit park improvements,
2) repair and replace restrooms, 3) providing drinking water, 4) provide a safe and clean
park, 5) improve signage for parking, rules/regulations, trail marker,
interpretive/educational, 6) provide shaded areas, 7) provide picnic areas, 8) provide area
for interpretive/education discussions, 9) provide parking, but limit expansion, 10)
enhance and preserve wildlife, 11) maintain existing trails, 12) connect trails, 13) restore
areas with native vegetation, and 14)preserve vegetation and wildlife in the park.
Commissioner Berry asked what the widths of the trails that are being improved. Mr.
Boyer stated each trail that is being improved will be approximately three feet wide.
Chairperson Hansen asked if the social trails would be removed. Ms. Benny stated that
the social, or undesignated, trails are being reviewed and the trail maintenance crews are
working with staff to determine if those should remain or be filled. Staff will return
before the Commission and provide recommendations.
Ms. Medler stated she, Chairperson Hansen and Commissioner Long are completing
meetings with the school districts. Chairperson Hansen stated that based on the public
input received, people have stated that they are for education and he felt that the
preliminary master plan had a box that said "EC" possibly to represent an education
center. He was curious if schools would visit the park if it had such a center. He felt it
Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes
March 13, 2006
Page 7
was worth the time to see if schools would use the education center if one was provided
in the park. Chairperson Hansen stated he wanted to know what the educators would want
if a field trip were taken to the park. He said Commissioner Long and Ms. Medler have
attended three meetings with Mountain Ridge High School, Legends Springs Elementary,
and Copper Creek as well. There is a plan to visit one middle school and Deer Valley
High School as well. Ms. Medler stated meetings may also be held with Glendale
Unified School District, as well as Tolleson School District, and Peoria School District.
Chairperson Hansen said to date, they found that the three schools they've spoken to have
indicated if they are taking a field trip, when they get off the bus, they want to stay out in
the field and get "hands on" experience and not be placed into a classroom. They would
like to have a place to sit down and have a discussion with a ranger or instructor and
would like shade,water, and restroom facilities.
Commissioner Berry suggested they meet with the athletic directors in addition to
meeting with the educators. Chairperson Hansen felt this was a good point.
Commissioner Jared stated he was thinking along the same lines. He said the cross-
country meets used to take place at the Thunderbird Conservation Park. He suggested
bringing the meets back to the park.
Chairperson Hansen stated the districts were concerned about balancing their needs
against the other users of the park. They need to meet the standards of promoting
conservation education and would appreciate any assistance.
Commissioner Harding asked if it was discussed with the principals and the teachers to
place a survey into the school newspapers in order to obtain student input.
Chairperson Hansen said no,but a good idea to consider.
Chairperson Hansen announced that a video of park tours would be shown. This video
shows various park elements and designs, and the pros and cons of amenities located in
different valley parks as well as TCP. He asked if anyone would like to speak prior to the
video.
Ms. Barbara Huber, of Glendale, stated that she is within walking distance of the park and
does not use the parking lots. A master plan for Thunderbird Conservation Park - she
understands that the park needs to be managed, but the most profound statement she
heard was to better utilize the existing park. It is a conservation park. She hopes the
wildlife would be enhanced and preserved, restore areas with native vegetation, and do
not add picnic areas. With regards to the education center, does it have to be here and is a
building needed? She said she doesn't understand how this park can be improved upon.
Please leave the pavement elsewhere.
Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes
March 13, 2006
Page 8
Mr. Larry Clark, of Glendale, recapped the history of the park for all in attendance. Mr.
Clark stated the three concerns he has which appear to violate the intent of the park
master plan concept and the forefathers that were so determined to preserve this park for
future generations are as follows: 1) the education center — although he is in favor of
education, a building of that magnitude is not needed; 2) the improvement of the culvert
would involve intensive development; and 3) a welcome center located in the park would
also require intensive development. These things would not fit well with what our
forefathers envisioned for the park. How did we get so far off the beaten trail with big
schemes? What does the word intensity mean? Things previously spoken of should be
maintained. The Commission and the City Council are in a fiduciary capacity to do just
that. He hopes that the Commission will think before they act on any intensive
development ideas or concepts.
Mr. Jeff Altenbach, of Glendale, stated he loves the park, the way it is and would suggest
to minimize the modifications that are made. He said he likes the existing amphitheater
and does not understand why it is not being used. He says some of the best experiences
he has had outdoors is related to music. He suggested music in the park on an afternoon
for a couple of hours. He suggested an acoustic guitar musician. This might attract more
people to the park.
Council member Phil Lieberman, of Glendale, speaking as a citizen stated he began to
use the park in 1963. He provided some of his previous park experiences for the
audience, staff, and Commission.
Council member Phil Lieberman stated he also represents the citizens of the Cactus
District. He suggested that a reasonable conclusion be reached and a plan which will
allow all residents to use the park. He thanked everyone in attendance for coming to
tonight's meeting.
Ms. Patricia Woods, of Glendale, stated that it is essential that this park remain a
conservation park. She would like to be able to hear the sounds of the park. She would
welcome the constituents of Mr. Lieberman or Mr. Goulet to come enjoy the park in its
natural beauty. She felt the Commission and the Council could either go down in infamy
by destroying the park or go down in history by saving it.
Mr. Allan DeFranco, of Glendale, thanked all in attendance. He does not understand why
Council member Lieberman believes this is a north-south battle. He said we do need to
educate our children. Children do not want to go from a classroom to a classroom. A
field trip is called a field trip, because they want to be out in the field. Mr. DeFranco
stated that the City of Glendale 2002 Master Plan clearly states that the city is short 150
acres of conservation park. Where is the city going to get this acreage?
Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes
March 13, 2006
Page 9
Chairperson Hansen asked if there is a set limit of conservation park that the city should
have. Ms. Benna stated the Parks and Recreation Department Master Plan guidelines for
the number of neighborhood park, community parks, regional parks, etc that should be
located within the city. Staff reviews this information each year to determine areas of
growth.
Mr. Cardin added that the New River area is currently being reviewed by staff as potential
park land. There are two areas of Glendale that touch along New River. The city has
entered into an intergovernmental agreement with the Maricopa County Flood Control
District to provide trails along those reaches of the river corridor which will connect to
trails in Phoenix and Peoria. Staff does actively look to add or partner with others to
provide open space areas for the public.
Ms. Benna then presented the video of park elements and design features that featured
different types and themes of signage, viewed different types of shade structures, various
entry points, restrooms, use of various materials, lighting features, gates, and trash
receptacles. The parks examples included: Scottsdale's Pinnacle Peak Park, Deer Valley
Rock Art Center, Phoenix's North Mountain Preserve Park and TCP.
Commissioner Gutierrez asked how the Pinnacle Peak parking spaces were maintained.
Ms. Benna stated she did not have that information on this item,but would obtain it.
Commissioner Socaciu asked about the tree cutting in the sedimentation basin shown on
the video. Ms. Benna stated that staff did not cut down the trees. She did not know why
the trees were being cut down. She said the staff needs to determine how it will manage
and provide education to the community about the vegetation around the area. Mr.
Cardin stated he has spoken with the Arrowhead Lakes Homeowner's Association
President and is planning a meeting with those residing along the sedimentation basin to
talk about the area.
Commissioner Gutierrez asked if there is any signage in this area. Mr. Cardin stated there
are signs that state"No Trespassing".
Commissioner Socaciu stated that in the future if there are any more videos shown;
comments from the public should be taken after the video. A lot of people spoke and left
and did not see the video which may address their concerns and questions.
Chairperson Hansen again opened the meeting for public comments regarding
Thunderbird Conservation Park.
Ms. Cathy Podolsky, of Glendale, stated she supports the comments made earlier
regarding minimizing destruction of the park. She stated the presentations have been very
informative. She has not seen any signage regarding "No Smoking" posted along
59th
Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes
March 13, 2006
Page 10
Avenue. She was very concerned about the fire that occurred last year. She stated the
survey conducted regarding parking was completed during the months of November and
December. She stated these may be the most popular months. She stated parking varies
from month to month.
Mr. Karel Podolsky, of Glendale, suggested conducting parking surveys during the
months of July or other months. He complimented staff on the meeting and added this is
his first time attending. He stated he likes the idea of non-paved parking lots. However,
the dust from 55th Avenue and Pinnacle Peak parking lot is too much for the valley. He
would like to minimize pollution although he does not want to see if paved. He asked the
Commission to research alternative solutions.
Ms. Benna stated staff will try to post the video onto the TCP webpage.
Commissioner Socaciu commented on the idea of having music in the park. He stated
based on previous presentations by staff that there is a concern of the location of the
current amphitheater and the parking issues related to it. He added there are sound
limitations so that music will not be blaring throughout the park. He said he understood
how someone could feel that there is a "north— south" issue related to the park. He said
those near the park are very concerned with the parking and do not want any additional
parking. Most of the citizens of Glendale would have to drive to the park. He added that
dust is a big issue where there is gravel and heavy usage. he suggested different types of
asphalt that would incorporate surrounding materials which would create a more natural
look. He described the asphalt in Sedona, Arizona where the red rock material is
incorporated which gives the asphalt a more natural color rather than black.
Commissioner Kultala said he and his wife visited the park on Sunday and spoke with
other users. He stated only one person they chatted with was from Glendale.
Chairperson Hansen thanked all those in attendance.
Ms. Benna stated she also appreciates the citizens that attended tonight's meeting as well
as the Commission's commitment to this process.
Chairperson Hansen questioned whether the Thunderbird Conservation Park item should
remain on the agenda each meeting or only when new information is presented.
Chairperson Socaciu suggested it should be listed under"Staff Update".
IV. COMMISSION GOALS
V REVIEW AND DISCUSS JOINT TOUR WITH COMMISSION ON
NEIGHBORHOODS AND PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes
March 13, 2006
Page 11
Commissioner Socaciu made a motion to continue these items to the April 10, 2006
meeting. Commissioner Gutierrez seconded the motion. The motion passed
unanimously.
V. DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Ms. Medler announced that two Recreation staff participated in the Aquatic Facilities
Operators National Certification Program. Jackie Anderson and Darren Scalzo are now
certified as aquatic facilities operators.
VI. Commission Comments
Commissioner Jared announced that this may be his last meeting as his term is expiring.
Commissioner Jared wanted to thank Commissioner Long for scheduling the tour of the
Glendale Arena.
Commissioner Socaciu wanted to clarify that public comment taken at the beginning of
the meeting should be only for items not appearing on the agenda as the public will have
the opportunity to comment on the agenda items when they arrive. Ms. Benna stated staff
would research this issue.
Commissioner Socaciu stated that he appreciated Commissioner Jared's comments
regarding the Yucca District.
VII. Next Meeting
The next meeting is tentatively scheduled for April 10, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. in room B-3 of
the Municipal Office Complex.
Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 9:56 p.m.
Diana Figueroa, Recording Secretary