HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - Minutes - City Council - Meeting Date: 5/24/2005 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA,
HELD TUESDAY, MAY 24, 2005, AT 7:00 P.M.
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Elaine M. Scruggs, with Vice Mayor
Thomas R. Eggleston and the following Councilmembers present: Joyce V. Clark,
Steven E. Frate, and David M. Goulet. Councilmembers H. Philip Lieberman and
Manuel D. Martinez were absent.
Also present were Ed Beasley, City Manager; Craig Tindall, City Attorney; and
Pamela Hanna, City Clerk.
COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE VII, SECTION 6(c) OF THE GLENDALE CHARTER
A statement was filed by the City Clerk that the five resolutions and four
ordinances to be considered at the meeting were available for public examination and
the title posted at City Hall more than 72 hours in advance of the meeting.
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE MAY 10, 2005 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
It was moved by Goulet, and seconded by Clark, to dispense with the
reading of the minutes of the May 10, 2005 City Council Meeting, as each member
of the Council had been provided copies in advance, and approve them as
written. The motion carried unanimously.
PROCLAMATIONS AND AWARDS
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
This is a request for the City Council to approve the recommended appointments
to the following boards and commissions that have a vacancy or expired term and for
the Mayor to administer the oath of office to those appointees in attendance.
Effective Date Expiration Date
Board of Adjustment
Sandy Burrell Cactus Appointment 05/24/2005 06/29/2006
Michael Schroth Yucca Re-appointment 06/30/2005 06/30/2007
1
Citizen's Advisory Commission on Neighborhoods
Donna Duggins Cactus Appointment 06/30/2005 06/30/2007
John H. Kolodziej Yucca Re-appointment 06/30/2005 06/30/2007
Citizen's Transportation Oversight Commission
Raj Shah Cactus Re-Appointment 07/25/2005 07/25/2007
The recommendation was to make appointments to the Board and Commissions
and administer the Oaths of Office.
It was moved by Eggleston, and seconded by Frate, to appoint Sandy
Burrell and Michael Schroth to the Board of Adjustment; Donna Duggins and
John H. Kolodziej to the Citizen's Advisory Commission on Neighborhoods; and
Raj Shah to the Citizen's Transportation Oversight Commission, for the terms
listed above. The motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Scruggs issued the Oath of Office to the new Board members and
Commissioners present.
Ms. Donna Duggins was present and took the Oath of Office.
CONSENT AGENDA
Mr. Ed Beasley, City Manager, read Agenda Item Numbers 1 through 4 and Ms.
Pamela Hanna, City Clerk, read Consent Resolutions Agenda Item Numbers 5 through
9 by number and title.
1. ARIZONA AUTOMOBILE THEFT AUTHORITY LAW ENFORCEMENT AND
PUBLIC AWARENESS GRANT FUNDS
This is a request for the City Council to authorize the acceptance of two grants
totaling $23000.21 from the Arizona Auto Theft Authority (AATA) for use by the Police
Department in the investigation and enforcement of auto theft crimes and to promote
vehicle theft prevention. This money specifically provides funding for auto theft related
police overtime, public awareness campaigns, communication lines for the "bait car"
program, and undercover surveillance equipment for the Auto Theft Unit. This grant will
enhance the efforts of the Police Department to reduce auto theft in the City of
Glendale.
Through the use of community partnerships and the leveraging of technology,
this grant provides the means to decrease the instances of auto theft. This will help to
ensure public safety and enhances the quality of life for the citizens of Glendale.
2
This grant provides for a total of $23,000.21 in funding for overtime expenses
related to auto theft investigations and prevention efforts, the communication lines for
the "bait car" program, undercover surveillance equipment for the Auto Theft Unit and to
enhance the Police Department's auto theft public awareness campaign. This funding
supports the Police Department's VIN etching program and provides Bait Vehicle
Program signage to apartment complexes and businesses. The "bait car" program has
proven to be an effective tool in auto theft enforcement, with two vehicles alone
generating 16 arrests in 2004. These funds would also provide the city the capability of
buying stolen vehicles from auto theft suspects and then prosecuting them.
The Glendale Police Department has applied for and received funding from the
Arizona Auto Theft Authority (AATA) on law enforcement programs for the past three
years.
The City of Glendale, along with many other Valley agencies, has experienced a
large increase in auto theft rates over the past several years. In 2003, the city had its
first decrease in auto theft in over 10 years. The auto theft rate slightly increased in
2004. Technology, in the form of "bait cars," enhanced enforcement by the Auto Theft
Unit, and auto theft awareness and prevention are key ingredients in combating this
problem. This grant enhances those efforts to continue to reduce auto theft.
The recommendation was to accept the grant funds in the amount of$23000.21,
from the AATA.
2. DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE ABATEMENT GRANT
This is a request for City Council to accept a $34,226 reimbursement grant from
the Oversight Council on Driving Under the Influence (DUI) Abatement.
The grant will fund the purchase of portable breath testers and overtime in order
to field more officers engaged in the proactive enforcement of traffic laws relating to
impaired driving.
The grant supports the City Council's goal of ensuring public safety and
awareness.
The Glendale Police Department submitted a proposal to the Oversight Council
on DUI Abatement on November 19, 2004. The Council approved the proposal on
December 2, 2004, awarding $30,314 for officer overtime and $3,912 for portable
breath testers. The funds are to be used to provide additional DUI enforcement
throughout 2005.
The funds provided by this grant will afford a higher level of enforcement and
deterrence than would have been otherwise possible.
3
Identification and arrest of impaired drivers and safer streets are priorities for the
Glendale Police Department. Every arrest of an impaired driver means that a life has
potentially been saved.
Major arterial streets throughout the city, including roadways in the Bell Road
entertainment corridor and those near emerging entertainment venues adjacent to the
stadium and arena, will be the enforcement priorities for this grant.
There is no financial match required for this funding. This is a one-time funding
by the Oversight Council on DUI Abatement. A specific account will be established in
Fund 47, the city's grant fund, once the grant agreements are formally executed.
The recommendation was to accept the $34,226 grant from the Oversight
Council on DUI Abatement.
3. CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT RISK AGREEMENT FOR 915T AVENUE AND
BETHANY HOME ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
This is a request for City Council approval of a construction manager at risk
contract (CMAR) with Hunter Contracting Inc. to provide design support services for
street improvements in 91St Avenue, between Maryland and Missouri Avenues, and in
Bethany Home Road, between 91st Avenue and the Loop 101.
The improvements included in these projects are consistent with the Council
goals of creating transportation options and enhancing the quality of life for Glendale
residents. The improvements also support enhanced economic growth in the area.
Construction of the Glendale Arena and the Cardinals Stadium will increase the
need for additional transportation capacity in the region. Agreements with the Cardinals
require Bethany Home Road and 91st Avenue to be improved to provide the additional
capacity. Off ramps for the Loop 101 at Bethany Home Road as well as an overpass of
Maryland Avenue over the Loop 101 is also required. City staff has worked closely with
the Cardinals, the Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority, Maricopa Association of
Governments, Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) and Salt River Project to
provide a conceptual design for the road projects. To meet tight schedule demands,
staff recommended using the CMAR method for procuring construction services for this
project.
On July 13, 2004, the Council approved an intergovernmental agreement with
ADOT for the Loop 101 and Maryland Avenue bridge design. On November 23, 2004,
the Council approved a professional services agreement with Wood Patel and
Associates for the design of 91St Avenue, between Maryland and Missouri Avenues.
On November 23, 2004, the Council approved a professional services agreement with
DMJM + Harris, Inc. for the design of Bethany Home Road from 91st Avenue to Loop
101. On March 22, 2005, the Council approved an intergovernmental agreement with
ADOT for the construction of the south ramps for Bethany Home Road at the Loop 101.
4
On January 27, 2005, a Request for Qualifications was advertised for design
support services. Responses were received from three construction firms. Interviews
were held on March 23, 2005. The interview committee was comprised of city staff and
an independent contractor representative. Hunter Contracting Company was selected
as best qualified for CMAR for this project.
Construction of the improvements in Bethany Home Road and on 91st Avenue
are important components for the transportation system in this part of Glendale. The
improvements will serve the additional traffic demands from the Cardinal Stadium and
Glendale Arena without placing an undue burden on the surrounding streets. The
improvements are also required to meet the city's obligations with the Cardinals.
Public meetings with the surrounding residents and businesses will be held as
part of the design for the project.
The cost of Hunter Contracting Company's design support services will not
exceed $156,101.43. Funds are available in Bethany Home Road — 83rd to 99th
Avenue, Account No. 61-8820-8330.
Grants Capital Expense One-Time Cost Budgeted Unbudgeted Total
X X $156,101.43
Account Name, Fund, Account and Line Item Number
Bethany Home Road — 83rd to 99`" Avenue, Account No. 61-8820-8330
The recommendation was to approve the construction manager at risk
agreement with Hunter Contracting Company in the amount of $156,101.43.
4. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR AUTOMATED WASH BAY SUPPLIES AND
SERVICES
This is a request for the City Council to approve a contract with Rieskamp
Equipment Company, Inc. to provide supplies and repair services for the city's vehicle
wash bay.
Provision of an automated wash bay for all city vehicles promotes exceptional
service delivery and maintains the city's image by keeping clean equipment on city
streets.
In August of 2004, the city opened a new equipment maintenance facility. This
facility includes an automated wash bay designed and installed by Rieskamp. The
supplies and equipment for use in this wash bay require specialized soaps and
replacement parts only available from the manufacturer. This equipment is under
factory warranty until August 2006.
5
In addition to the factory warranty, Reiskamp offers a lifetime limited warranty
package that would benefit the city. This package requires soap products and repair
services to be purchased from Rieskamp. The lifetime warranty provides a monthly
equipment inspection, free minor repairs, and no labor charge for major repairs. To
participate in this lifetime warranty package, the supplies and repair services contract
with Reiskamp will run for one year, with annual renewal options for up to four
additional years.
The city currently uses Rieskamp for wash bay supplies and repair services in
compliance with the warranty.
Funding is available in the Field Operations Department Equipment Management
operating budget.
Grants Capital Expense One-Time Cost Budgeted Unbudgeted Total
X $60,000
Account Name, Fund, Account and Line Item Number
Wash Bay Supplies and Repairs, 16-6252-7321
The recommendation was to award a contract to Rieskamp Equipment
Company, Inc. to provide supplies and repair services for the city's vehicle wash bay in
an amount not to exceed $60,000.
CONSENT RESOLUTIONS
5. RATE ADJUSTMENTS FOR LANDFILL DISPOSAL SERVICES AND
COMMERCIAL SANITATION COLLECTION
This is a request for the City Council to adopt a resolution approving rate
adjustments for landfill disposal services and commercial sanitation collection.
The rate adjustments will provide financial stability and enable the city to
continue providing exceptional services.
The city's solid waste management system is divided into two major functions:
1. Glendale Municipal Landfill and Materials Recovery Facility (MRF)
2. Residential and commercial sanitation services and residential loose trash
collection.
Each area accounts for expenses and revenues within an Enterprise Fund.
Enterprise Funds are financially independent from the city's General Fund.
6
At the October 5, 2004 workshop, the City Council reviewed recommendations
from solid waste management consultant R.W. Beck regarding annual landfill rate
adjustments through Fiscal Year 2008-09 for residents of single family and duplex
dwellings, as well as internal customers such as city sanitation vehicles hauling
commercial and city office refuse. The first adjustment was approved by the Council on
December 14, 2004 when the landfill rate per ton for these customers was decreased
from $19.50 to $12.57 effective January 1, 2005. Residents of single family and duplex
dwellings who self-haul refuse to the landfill will continue to receive services at no
charge for the first ton of waste.
For the fiscal year starting July 1, 2005, the following two rate adjustments are
recommended:
1. Consistent with the R.W. Beck findings, adjust the landfill rate per ton from
$12.57 to $13.28 for residents of single family and duplex dwellings, as well
as internal customers.
2. While all sanitation services have charged $131.25 per ton for Hard to
Handle Waste, the Commercial Sanitation fee schedule listed this amount as
$141.75 per ton. For consistency, this rate should be listed as $131.25 per
ton on the Commercial Sanitation fee schedule. Examples of Hard to Handle
Waste include boats, trailers, modular homes, and other items requiring
special handling.
These rate changes will not affect the monthly billing mailed to residents.
On December 14, 2004, the Council approved a rate adjustment for landfill
disposal. This adjustment was effective January 1 , 2005.
On June 10, 2003, the Council approved rate adjustments for landfill disposal
and commercial sanitation collection. These adjustments became effective July 1,
2003.
Rate and fee adjustments were made in July of 2000 for the commercial
services.
Effective solid waste management services are critical to community health and
safety. To ensure these essential services are financially sound, all revenues and
expenses are accounted for in Enterprise Funds. These rate adjustments provide
revenues to meet expenses while keeping rates as low as possible for residents.
The recommendation was to waive reading beyond the title and adopt a
resolution setting the residential Landfill disposal rate at $13.28 per ton and setting the
Hard to Handle Waste fee for the Landfill and Commercial Sanitation at $131.25 per
ton effective July 1, 2005.
7
Resolution No. 3850 New Series was read by number and title only, it being A
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA, ADJUSTING THE RATES FOR LANDFILL DISPOSAL
SERVICES AND COMMERCIAL SANITATION COLLECTION; AND ESTABLISHING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
6. ACQUISITION OF 22 ACRES AT 99TH AND GLENDALE AVENUES
This is a request for the City Council to approve the acquisition of 22 acres of
land located at 99th and Glendale Avenues.
The acquisition of this property will address the council's goal of creating
transportation options.
The property owner, the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT), has
expressed an interest in selling 22 acres located at 99th and Glendale Avenues at cost.
The acquisition of this property will provide maximum flexibility to the city for
developing a future transit center in the western area.
An immediate benefit would be to provide overflow parking in the interim for large
events at the stadium and arena. It could also be used in the interim for special events
that are prohibited in the Entertainment District at Westgate.
The purchase price of the property is $1,914,500. An initial payment of
$500,000 will be due immediately, with the remaining balance of $1,414,500 to be paid
within 10 years with no prepayment penalty if paid sooner.
Funding for the purchase of this property is available in Fiscal Year 2004-05 and
the proposed Fiscal Year 2005-06 capital budget for Pedestrian Circulation (Cardinals-
Coyotes Area), Account No. 25-9474-8300.
Grants Capital Expense One-Time Cost Budgeted Unbudgeted Total
X X $1,914,500
Account Name, Fund, Account and Line Item Number
Pedestrian Circulation/Card-Yotes Area 25-9474-8300
The recommendation was to waive reading beyond the title and adopt a
resolution authorizing the City Manager to sign all documents necessary to purchase
the property located at 99th and Glendale Avenues in an amount of $1,914,500, plus
customary closing costs.
8
Resolution No. 3851 New Series was read by number and title only, it being A
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO
ACQUIRE CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER
OF 99TH AND GLENDALE AVENUES IN GLENDALE, MARICOPA COUNTY,
ARIZONA, TO BE USED FOR TRANSPORTATION PURPOSES; AND DIRECTING
THE EXECUTION OF ANY DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO EFFECTUATE SAID
PURCHASE.
7. FISCAL YEAR 2004 LAW ENFORCEMENT TERRORISM PREVENTION
PROGRAM GRANT
This is a request for the City Council to adopt a resolution authorizing the
entering into of an intergovernmental agreement with the State of Arizona Division of
Emergency Management to administer Law Enforcement Terrorism Prevention
Program grant funds awarded to the City of Glendale and accept a 2004 Law
Enforcement Terrorism Prevention Program grant to enhance the Police Department's
terrorism prevention and intervention program.
This request supports the Council priority of ensuring public safety for Glendale
residents.
Since 1999, the City of Glendale has been able to leverage grant funds to
enhance public safety preparedness within the city and the West Valley. Grant funds
have been used to purchase safety equipment to protect first responders, specialized
equipment for technical operations, equipment to enhance communication efforts, and
to enhance terrorism prevention and intervention programs.
Grant funds awarded to the City of Glendale under the 2004 Law Enforcement
Terrorism Prevention Program will enable Glendale's Police Department to participate
in a regional public safety agency voice communications capacity assessment needed
to evaluate and improve inter-agency data sharing systems and develop and implement
a regional terrorism early warning system.
The police department works closely with the Information Technology
Department on both the voice communications and data sharing projects. This
partnership between the departments will allow the Information Technology Department
to ensure compatibility, as much as possible, with existing information technology
standards.
Accepting this award will improve the ability of Glendale and other West Valley
public safety agencies to communicate more effectively with each other and to share
critical information that may be needed to avert or respond quickly and appropriately to
potential or actual terrorism threats.
9
This $800,000 grant award includes $300,000 to complete a comprehensive
needs assessment of Glendale and West Valley police agency communication systems
and $500,000 to establish and purchase software and equipment needed for the
regional terrorism intelligence early warning system. The Police Department may bring
a supplemental budget request forward in Fiscal Year 2006-07 for ongoing costs related
to the update of data equipment and software requirements for the regional terrorism
intelligence early warning system. Any grant-related ongoing expenses incurred in
Fiscal Year 2005-06 will be absorbed in the Police Department's current operating
budget.
This is one-time funding by the State of Arizona Division of Emergency
Management. A specific account will be established in Fund 47, the City's grant fund,
once the grant agreements are formally executed.
Grants Capital Expense One-Time Cost Budgeted Unbudgeted Total
X $800,000 $800,000
Account Name, Fund, Account and Line Item Number
Pending Council approval.
The recommendation was to waive reading beyond the title and adopt a
resolution authorizing the entering into of an intergovernmental agreement with the
State of Arizona Division of Emergency Management (ADEM) to administer Law
Enforcement Terrorism Prevention Program funds and to accept a 2004 Law
Enforcement Terrorism Prevention Program grant in the amount of $800,000 to
enhance the interoperability of the Police Department's voice communications system.
Resolution No. 3852 New Series was read by number and title only, it being A
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE ENTERING INTO OF AN
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF ARIZONA, DIVISION
OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, TO ACCEPT AND ADMINISTER GRANT
FUNDING AS PART OF THE 2004 LAW ENFORCEMENT TERRORISM
PREVENTION PROGRAM.
8. CANVASS OF VOTES RESOLUTION MAY 17, 2005 SPECIAL ELECTION
This is a request for the City Council to adopt the canvass of vote resolution for
the May 17, 2005 Special Election.
It is required by A.R.S. 16-342 that "the governing body holding an election shall
canvass the election not less than six days nor more than 15 days following the
election". The May 17, 2005 Special Election has ballot questions: Proposition 101,
Proposition 102 and Proposition 103.
10
The May 17, 2005 Special Election was called by the City Council on January
25, 2005 and the Notice of Election was approved on April 12, 2005.
The recommendation was to adopt the Canvass of Votes Resolution for the May
17, 2005 Special Election
Resolution No. 3853 New Series was read by number and title only, it being A
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA, DECLARING AND ADOPTING THE RESULTS OF THE
SPECIAL ELECTION HELD ON MAY 17, 2005; AND ORDERING THAT A CERTIFIED
COPY OF THIS RESOLUTION BE RECORDED.
9. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BOND FINANCING FOR JOHN C.
LINCOLN HEALTH NETWORK
This is a request for the City Council to approve the issuance of Industrial
Development Bond Authority (IDA) bonds for John C. Lincoln Health Network (Lincoln)
in an amount not to exceed $47,000,000.
Services provided by the John C. Lincoln Health Network enhance the quality of
life for Glendale residents.
The Industrial Development Authority of the City of Glendale is an Arizona non-
profit corporation designated by law as a political subdivision of the State of Arizona,
and is empowered to issue revenue bonds and loan the proceeds from the sale of such
bonds to finance "projects" as defined in A.R.S. § 35-701. Financing for a health care
institution constitutes a "project" within the meaning of the statute. Issuance of IDA
bonds will not impact the city in terms of any use of the city's bond capacity and it does
not affect the city's ability to pursue any other IDA projects.
John C. Lincoln Health Network is an Arizona nonprofit 501(C)(3) corporation
and is a major provider of health care services in the metropolitan Phoenix area.
Lincoln owns and operates two acute care hospital facilities and also owns and/or
operates a number of related health care facilities.
Lincoln plans to improve the North Mountain acute care hospital facility.
Improvements include significantly expanding the emergency department and operating
rooms and making improvements to medical-surgical beds, critical care beds, ancillary
services and related upgrades of patient and public areas.
Total project costs are estimated to be approximately $55,000,000, with
approximately $40,000,000 to be financed with bond proceeds and the balance to be
funded from reserves of Lincoln. Additionally, up to approximately $7,000,000 of bond
proceeds may be used to refund (refinance) bonds previously issued for the benefit of
Lincoln. All fees will be paid by Lincoln.
11
Under the provisions of A.R.S. § 35-721, proceedings of the IDA for the issuance
of its bonds require the approval of the Glendale City Council, as the governing body of
the IDA. The City of Glendale is not liable or obligated for the payment of bonds issued
by the IDA.
A significant portion of Glendale is in the service area of the Lincoln facilities.
565 residents of Glendale are employed as part of Lincoln's 3,272 workforce.
Residents of Glendale use the Lincoln facilities for inpatient care, emergency room
care, and outpatient treatment. Also Midwestern University utilizes Lincoln's facilities
for training of medical students.
The recommendation was to waive reading beyond the title and adopt a
resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of revenue bonds by the Industrial
Development Authority in an amount not to exceed $47,000,000 for John C. Lincoln
Health Network.
Resolution No. 3854 New Series was read by number and title only, it being A
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA, APPROVING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE BY THE
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE,
ARIZONA, OF NOT TO EXCEED $47,000,000 OF ITS HOSPITAL REVENUE AND
REFUNDING BONDS (JOHN C. LINCOLN HEALTH NETWORK PROJECT), SERIES
2005.
It was moved by Eggleston and seconded by Frate, to approve the
recommended actions on Consent Agenda Item Nos. 1 through 9, including the
approval and adoption of Resolution No. 3850 New Series, Resolution No. 3851
New Series, Resolution No. 3852 New Series, Resolution No. 3853 New Series,
and Resolution No. 3854. The motion carried unanimously.
ORDINANCES
10. DEVELOPMENT & DISPOSITION AGREEMENT WITH VANGUARD
CITYHOME LLC
Mr. Arthur Lynch, Deputy City Manager, presented this item. Mr. Jon Froke,
Planning Director, presented additional information on this item.
This is a request for the City Council to adopt an ordinance authorizing staff to
enter into a Development and Disposition Agreement with Vanguard CityHome LLC for
the purchase and development of property located in downtown Glendale.
The sale and development of this land will enhance the quality of life for
Glendale residents, create owner-occupied townhomes, and will promote economic
development in the downtown area.
12
On February 1, 2005, the Council directed staff to move forward with a Request
for Proposal (RFP) for the re-development of two sites located in the downtown. The
RFP sought a mixed-use redevelopment project, including both residential and
commercial uses. The minimum acceptable bid price for the combined city-owned sites
was set at $500,000.
Site 1: 7121 N 57th Avenue (2.54 Acres)
Site 2: 7149 N 58th Avenue (1.12 Acres)
Three responses were received and the review panel unanimously selected
Vanguard CityHome as the winning respondent to develop the site. It was determined
that the Vanguard proposal met the city's goals for the downtown and their concept was
innovative and included both residential and commercial elements. They offered a
purchase price of $500,000 and included a progressive development schedule with the
close of phase one taking place in December of 2006.
Vanguard CityHome has offices in San Francisco and Scottsdale specializing in
unique urban development. The company's principals, Chris Camberlango, James
Nunemacher and Michael Trailor, have over 60 years of combined experience in land
acquisition, site design/development, architectural design, construction, sales and
marketing of residential properties. They have extensive expertise in the building and
development business and have been responsible for designing and developing
hundreds of neighborhoods in Arizona and California from large master planned
communities to urban mid-rise and high-rise condominium buildings. Vanguard
CityHome is the developer of the former Safari Hotel site on Scottsdale Road, which will
include 227 lofts, condominiums and live/work units, along with retail uses.
Vanguard CityHome will be developing a mixed-use development, which will
include both residential, retail, and office components. The townhomes range in size
from 900 to 1,900 square feet and have an estimated purchase price of $150,000-
$240,000 per unit. Vanguard is sensitive to and understands the scale and unique
charm of downtown Glendale. Their development plan includes the use of materials,
colors, and architectural design features that will complement and enhance the
surrounding area.
Vanguard CityHome offered an adaptive re-use option for the existing building on
site 2. The former sanctuary will be adapted into a commercial use to include a café,
an outdoor patio area and other complementary retail uses. Other elements of the
proposal included the following:
Site 1 (7121 N 57th Avenue): 76 townhouses and live/work component
o Pool and commons area
o Fountain plaza area
o Outdoor café area
o Commercial element along the ground level (5,900+ square feet of
commercial)
13
Site 2 (7149 N 58`h Avenue): 18 townhouses with a commercial element
o Commercial space (7,400 square feet)
o Sunken café terrace
o Pool and commons area
o Fountain plaza
This project will create 94 owner-occupied quality residential housing options in
the downtown area. The live-work component of the development will provide an
opportunity for people to both live and work in the area. Having high-quality townhomes
available for purchase will enhance the area and will attract both young professionals
and retirees to the development. The retail component of the development will provide
sales tax revenue to the City of Glendale and will improve the quality of life for nearby
residents and business owners.
A public notice of the city's intent to sell the property was published in the
Glendale Star and the Arizona Republic in February 2005.
Proceeds from the sale of this property will be deposited to the General Fund,
Account No. 01-4594, Proceeds from the Disposal of Assets.
The recommendation was to waive reading beyond the title and adopt an
ordinance authorizing the entering into of a Development and Disposition Agreement
with Vanguard CityHome LLC.
Mr. Lynch commented on the tremendous amount of effort and focus that has
been placed on redeveloping the downtown area over the past few years, stating the
proposed project represents a key component of that effort.
Mr. Froke explained the DDA does not establish zoning or design review, stating
it lays the framework for what will occur next from a planning perspective. He said both
sites will go through a zoning exercise and a citizen participation process prior to the
Planning Commission hearing, noting they are currently preparing for a pre-application
meeting with the technical team and applicant.
Councilmember Clark asked Mr. Tindall to update the Council on the status of
the parking issue. Mr. Tindall stated there have been discussions with the Grace
Lutheran Church to the north of the property concerning parking for the church. He
explained there was a development agreement with the church that abandoned 56th
Avenue to allow the church to build a sanctuary and, in doing that, the city allowed and
the church accepted a waiver of the parking requirements that go along with the use.
He stated 100 additional parking spaces were added when the property was
redeveloped and public parking located across the street has been made available by
the city. He said the church and city have also discussed with Glendale Elementary
School District the use of the parking lot at Landmark School.
Mayor Scruggs opened the public hearing on Agenda Item No. 10.
14
The following submitted speaker cards in opposition to the item, but chose not to
address the Council: Donald Voss, Phoenix; Pat Koch, Glendale; Raymond Yeary,
Glendale; Louis Meyer, Glendale; Elton Pyle, Phoenix; Keith Feldt, Phoenix; Myron
Steinmann; Elaine Steinmann, Phoenix; Pauletta Bartley, Avondale; Cheryl
Szczepkowski, Glendale; and Quisha Bartley, Avondale.
Ms. Loren Wagner, a resident of the City of Glendale, submitted a written
statement of concern from Grace Lutheran Church regarding parking issues, which
Mayor Scruggs read into the record.
Mr. Ken Wright, a resident of the City of Surprise, said he asked several months
ago that consideration be given to the retention of the First Southern Baptist Church
and Sanctuary. He stated a petition containing approximately 400 signatures had been
submitted and a number of people spoke about their concern over the building. He
noted he was one of two people who negotiated the sale of the facility. He explained
the older building was used for religious education programs for youth and for office
space. He said during negotiations, the city counter-offered their request for more
money with an offer to take over maintenance of the facility. He stated the Church
Council formed a 16-member committee to study the highest and best use of the
building, noting he served on that committee. He said during their first meeting Mr.
Beasley laid out what he had been told by the Council to do with regards to the
property, which was to have the building demolished. He stated Councilmembers
Lieberman, Goulet and Clark attended their meetings, pointing out Councilmember
Goulet attended each individual sub-committee meeting. He said the RFP came before
the committee in February and Mr. Beasley assured the committee he would try to get
their findings incorporated into any proposals submitted. He said he favors the
ordinance before Council.
Mr. Andrew Voss, a resident of the City of Glendale Ocotillo District, expressed
his opinion the proposed sale and development is not the correct use of the property,
as it will not enhance the area. He stated the change would dramatically affect the
Civic Center, downtown special events and Grace Lutheran Church and take away
much needed parking from the downtown area. He said on April 23, 2002 Grace
Lutheran and the City of Glendale entered an agreement to waive the parking
requirement and for the abandonment of 56th Avenue. He stated the records state by
compliance of the special terms Grace Lutheran Church would be granted a one-time
50 parking space credit. He stated the resolution is unfair to Grace Lutheran
specifically and to the citizen of Glendale in general. He said the deal is expected to
raise $1.4 million in tax payer money while the cost of the purchase, the value of the
properties the city already owns and construction of the present parking lot at 56th
Avenue and Palmaire come to approximately $1,976,500. He stated the city intends to
sell the land for $500,000. He said there are 213 parking spaces in the lot at 56th
Avenue and Palmaire, 50 percent of which are used regularly on weekends and during
Civic Center events. He referenced an email from Councilmember Goulet, which
explained the need for parking is 400 to 500 spaces, stating he believes that estimation
was too high. He said they do not want the structures built as proposed and they do not
15
want Catlin Court or the downtown to be modified in this way. He urged the Council to
deny the agreement with Vanguard Homes, suggesting the proposed project would be
better suited for the Sugar Beet Factory property.
Mr. Lyle Koch on behalf of Mr. Larry Rovey, a resident of the City of Glendale
Sahuaro District, said Mr. Rovey was instrumental in the city's discussions concerning
the church's parking dilemma. He read a letter from Mr. Rovey, which explained he
was involved in the discussion with Chris Luna and Jim Colson, former city staff, to
transfer one lot on that block to the city in lieu of furnishing an additional 50-onsite
parking spaces for the church expansion. The arrangement in no way eliminated the
need for the actual parking spots and the spirit of the discussion centered on the
reasonableness of joint-use parking, particularly considering the church's typical time of
need. The 220 parking spaces on the interior of that block serve their needs and the
needs of the Civic Center. The church felt the contribution of the property was
reasonable and the church's design and construction were based on the understanding
that easily accessed parking would be located to the south of their property. They
generally understood the block might be developed in time, but that any displaced
parking would be replaced with the development. The Vanguard project will eliminate
all of the parking and they feel overflow parking from the residences will occupy street
spaces their members have historically used. The church planning process was
delayed approximately nine months at Jim Colson's request to await the outcome of the
Downtown Redevelopment Committee. It was felt the church made a nice buffer
between residential to the north and the civic/commercial activities to the south and
west. The expansion of their facility is an asset to Glendale and downtown
redevelopment, with eight substandard dwelling units removed and over $80,000 paid
to the city in permits and fees. In his letter, Mr. Rovey asked the Council to delay the
item until more discussion can take place regarding the dilemma the agreement will put
on their church.
Mr. Ron Kolb, a resident of the City of Glendale Ocotillo District, said he supports
development and truly loves Glendale. He stated, while he would like to support the
project and believe it will benefit the area, he does not. He said his concerns include
building heights, density, parking, and encroachment. He suggested a different
location, such as the Beet Factory, would be more appropriate for the proposed project.
He explained developers typically require higher densities to offset high land costs;
stating, however, the land costs in this instance are negligible. He asked to see copies
of the minutes from the open meetings that show the demand for this type of project as
well as data that supports the applicant's claim that the project will bring new jobs to the
area. He said parking is or is not an issue, depending on who you talk to, but the
proposed 1.5 parking spaces per unit will add more parking to the street. He expressed
his opinion the project, as proposed, will result in the exodus of businesses and shops
in the area. He said both the city and the private sector have invested a lot of money to
improve the downtown area and it should be protected. He stated the proposed project
would box in the Civic Center, eliminating its ability to grow and become self-sufficient.
Mr. Kolb addressed Vice Mayor Eggleston specifically, stating as a former shopkeeper
and present property owner he should understand the difficulties small businesses face
16
in trying to succeed. He said the low ratio of commercial to residential of the project
would not help anyone. He stated the project is already subsidized somewhat given the
price of the property and the waiver of fees. He expressed concern the sale price will
be reduced if the sale of units is not as projected, resulting in, at best, a glorified
apartment complex. He urged the Council to vote against the project.
Mr. David Chang, a resident of the City of Peoria, explained he is in the process
of building an Asian restaurant across the street and acquiring another property further
down the street from the subject property. He said, as a business owner, they need
people to live in the downtown area. He stated, while he does not know if the proposed
project is the right one, he encourages the Council to consider bringing more residents
into the downtown area.
Ms. Susan Fitzgerald, a resident of the City of Glendale Ocotillo District, stated
she is the Executive Director of the Bead Museum. She spoke in support of the
proposed project, stating it provides the kind of creative and innovative momentum the
city needs to keep downtown Glendale a vibrant destination. She said, as a cultural,
leisure and tourist destination, it is important to remain conscious of attracting people to
the area. She stated, as a mixed-use development, the project would enhance the
livelihood of existing businesses and residents. She expressed her opinion that, with
the right vision and planning, the First Baptist Church building could be a very creative
gathering place. She stated all too often there is more parking than people in the
downtown area and while parking shortages would be troublesome, there are ways to
address parking with the contractor. She said, by moving forward with the project, the
city will make great strides in continually investing and improving the quality of life in
downtown Glendale.
Mr. Steve Szczepkowski, a resident of the City of Glendale Ocotillo District, said,
according to the City Center Master Plan, residential development should occur outside
the commercial city center core area of 55th to Grand, and Myrtle to Lamar. He stated
the proposed project does not follow the City Center Master Plan. He said the Catlin
Court PAD also establishes criteria for buildings within the area and the proposed town
homes do not meet those criteria.
Mr. Fred Beyer, a resident of the City of Glendale Barrel District, said his office is
located across the street from the Civic Center and he opposes the project for several
reasons. He explained a couple years ago an application to renovate a house in the
area was denied because it was considered a commercial district. He questioned why
the city is selling the property for $500,000 when it has invested about $1.5 million. He
said the town homes are expected to sell for between $150,000 and $240,000, resulting
in a very good return for the developer. He pointed out 94 units at 1.5 cars will result in
141 parking spaces being needed for the new residents. He asked how many
additional spaces would be needed for the commercial development. He said people
have commented on the need for additional parking and have asked him why the First
Baptist Church lot was not paved to provide additional parking. He expressed his
opinion the project is not right for the area.
17
Mayor Scruggs read two letters in favor of the project; one from Raymond E.
Rails, President of A Mad Hatter's Antiques and Collectibles, Inc. and a second from
Karen Landes, The Apple Tree, both in favor of the proposed project. Written copies of
the letters were submitted for the record.
Mayor Scruggs closed the public hearing.
Mr. Mike Trailor, Vanguard CityHome, explained his father and grandfather
started building homes in Phoenix in the 1940s and they have continued to build homes
for the past 70 years. He said they were excited to learn of the city's desire to move
forward with its plan to develop the downtown Glendale area and were happy to
participate in the RFP. He stated they spent the greater part of one day touring the
Catlin Court area and looking at the various styles of architecture that exists in the area.
He said they then went back and created a 2005 version of what they felt one of the
first housing developments might have been. He stated, while he is sorry to hear that
some people are not positive about the development, he believes a lot of people will be
excited about the project. He characterized their design as "modern farmhouse",
stating it is comprised of two for-sale products. He explained they have identified two
specific markets, young professionals and empty nesters, and the commercial spaces
on the first floors will allow for work-live situations. With regard to concerns about
parking, Mr. Trailor stated they are doing everything they can to accommodate a
minimum of two parking spaces per unit on the project, despite the fact that the
ordinance only calls for 1.5 spaces per unit. He expressed his opinion their project will
help make the downtown area even more vibrant and attractive.
Mayor Scruggs asked Mr. Trailor if people who reside in the units would park in
the neighborhood. Mr. Trailor assured Mayor Scruggs they intend to provide two
parking spaces per unit within the project. He also offered to work with the city if it is
determined that additional parking is needed in the downtown area.
Vice Mayor Eggleston asked if the units would be owner-occupied. Mr. Trailor
responded yes, noting they have talked to young professionals who work in the city of
Glendale and older residents who have already indicated they will purchase units.
Councilmember Goulet asked if any commercial development that occurs would
have parking available within the site. Mr. Trailer said they are still trying to hard line
the site plans, but they are confident all for sale units will have a minimum of two
parking spaces on the site. He said they will also be able to accommodate some
commercial parking, but the total number of spaces has not yet been quantified.
18
Ordinance No. 2438 New Series was read by number and title only; it being AN
ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE ENTERING INTO OF A
DEVELOPMENT AND DISPOSITION AGREEMENT WITH VANGUARD CITYHOME
LLC FOR THE SALE AND DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY LOCATED IN
DOWNTOWN GLENDALE (SITE 1: 2.54 ACRES LOCATED AT 7121 NORTH 57TH
AVENUE; AND SITE 2: 1.12 ACRES LOCATED AT 7149 NORTH 58TH AVENUE);
AND DIRECTING THAT THE AGREEMENT BE RECORDED.
It was moved by Goulet, and seconded by Clark, to approve Ordinance No.
2438 New Series.
Councilmember Goulet thanked those who spoke for taking the time to address
the Council, regardless of their position on the item. He said it is unfortunate some
misinformation has been deliberately disseminated in an attempt to further cloud the
issue. He pointed out everyone will have the opportunity to attend and speak at future
participation meetings and Planning Commission meetings. He stated Mr. Trailor and
his staff are very sensitive to the neighborhood's concerns and he believes the project
will prove to be very positive. He said he assured Pastor Clark that they will not be
negligent in addressing the parking issue and that the issue will be resolved. He stated
a successful city has to have a successful downtown and people need to be willing to
adapt, change, develop and grow. He said he is confident the issues can be addressed
and he looks forward to hearing from the residents at the meetings.
Councilmember Clark said she would support the project because it saves the
old part of the church. She acknowledged that the Adult Center parking spaces will be
lost, stating, however, she believes staff recognizes the city's obligation to replace
those lost spaces. She said she likes the concept of the project and looks forward to
seeing what Mr. Trailor proposes in terms of the details of the project. She stated she
is concerned somewhat about the density of the project and the availability of parking
on the site, but she will withhold judgment until she sees how they address those
issues. She encouraged everyone to be open-minded and use the public meetings as
an opportunity to offer constructive comments to make the project better.
Vice Mayor Eggleston said he has seen similar developments in other cities and
he believes the proposed project will be successful. He expressed his opinion the
parking issues can be resolved, stating he will make a strong effort to address the issue
over the next few months.
Councilmember Frate said he heard everyone's concerns, particularly about the
parking, noting they have already taken steps to address the problem. He said if the
developer can build a similar development in San Francisco and address parking issues
there, they could do so in Glendale.
Mayor Scruggs explained the Adult Center was built about 25 years ago using
federal funds and the city is within its legal rights to use the property for the proposed
19
use. She said the $1.4 million the city spent included the purchase of six acres of land
it now uses for its Adult Center; therefore, allegations that the city is throwing money
away are not true. She pointed out Mr. Rovey's letter says they knew the block would
eventually be developed, stating the proposed project should not come as a great
surprise to anyone. She said they have between now and February 2006 when
construction starts to look for additional parking for the church. She pointed out the
original plans for the bank building across from Murphy Park drawn up in the 1980's
and approved by the Planning Commission include an office structure and parking
structure of equal height. With regard to suggestions that the project be moved to the
Sugar Beet Factor, Mayor Scruggs explained the Sugar Beet factory is owned by a
large group of people who are not interested in development at this time. In response
to concerns about restricting the growth of the Civic Center, she noted the Council
approved contracts at its last meeting to proceed with the conversion of the Wells Fargo
Bank building. She said, once completed, the two buildings together will accommodate
every kind of event that would want to come to a location that does not have a hotel.
She said it is a known, proven planning concept throughout the United States that
people must live in a downtown area to make it successful, pointing out the Catlin Court
Overlay District actually eliminated a lot of housing. She said after all the time and
effort that went into saving the church they found a developer who sees the site as a
good place for new residential development and is willing to build the reuse of the
sanctuary into his plans. She stated the plans for revitalizing the downtown area have
always included new residential development and the developer has identified a
housing product that will compliment the area. She said she did not believe Glendale
would be fortunate enough to find a developer who would propose residential
development in the downtown area during her remaining time in office, noting Phoenix
and Tempe have been working on their downtown redevelopment plans for two or more
decades and are just now getting the same type of residential component that is being
proposed by Mr. Trailor. She assured everyone the city would work on the parking
issue, stating it has always been an issue of timing.
Motion carried on a roll call vote, with the following Councilmembers
voting "aye": Clark, Goulet, Eggleston, Frate, and Scruggs. Members voting
"nay": none.
11. SEWER EASEMENT AGREEMENT — NORTHEAST CORNER OF 91ST AND
GLENDALE AVENUES
Ms. Kathie Sholly, Property Manager, presented this item.
This is a request for the City Council to approve a sewer line easement
agreement between the city of Glendale and NEC91/Glendale, LLC.
20
The offsite sewer line is required for the development of the Provence
subdivision, located between 89th and 91St Avenues, north of Glendale Avenue. The
easement for this sewer line is located on property not owned by the developer of the
Provence subdivision, but is required to accommodate the development of the
subdivision.
Any costs associated with the sewer line easement are the responsibility of the
Provence subdivision developer.
The recommendation was to waive reading beyond the title and adopt an
ordinance authorizing the City Manager to execute an easement for sewer line
agreement with NEC91/Glendale, LLC for the offsite sewer line at the northeast corner
of 91St and Glendale Avenues.
Ordinance No. 2439 New Series was read by number and title only, it being AN
ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A SEWER EASEMENT
AGREEMENT WITH NEC91/GLENDALE, LLC FOR THE OFFSITE SEWER LINE AT
THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 91ST AND GLENDALE AVENUES; AND DIRECTING
THE CITY CLERK TO RECORD A CERTIFIED COPY OF THIS ORDINANCE.
It was moved by Frate, and seconded by Clark, to approve Ordinance No.
2439 New Series. Motion carried on a roll call vote, with the following
Councilmembers voting "aye": Clark, Goulet, Eggleston, Frate, and Scruggs.
Members voting "nay": none.
12. ANNEXATION ORDINANCE FOR ANNEXATION AREA NO. 155 (AN-155):
11528 WEST ORANGEWOOD AVENUE AND 11532 WEST GLENDALE
AVENUE
Ms. Kate Langford, Senior Planner presented this item.
This is a request for the City Council to adopt an annexation ordinance for 159
acres at the northwest corner of 115th Avenue and Glendale Avenue.
The city's voter-approved General Plan includes specific goals addressing the
need for growth management. These goals include promotion of sound growth
management methods and managing growth to achieve reasonable, responsible urban
development. Annexation is a tool that can be used by the city to direct and manage
growth.
This annexation is the first location west of 115th Avenue that has been
presented to the Council for consideration since the adoption of the Annexation Policy
in December OF 2003. The city has owned the Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) site
since 1991 and the future Public Safety Joint Training Facility site since 1999.
21
The site encompasses a total of 158.9 acres. The MRF is currently located on
the northern half of the site. The future training facility is to be located on the southern
portion of the site.
The annexation of this 158.9-acre site would bring existing and future public uses
into the incorporated limits of the city and would assure conformance with the Glendale
General Plan and Glendale development standards.
The recommendation was to waive reading beyond the title and adopt an
ordinance increasing the Glendale City Limits, as defined in the annexation ordinance
for Annexation Area Number 155.
Ordinance No. 2440 New Series was read by number and title only, it being AN
ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA, EXTENDING AND INCREASING THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF
THE CITY OF GLENDALE, MARICOPA COUNTY, STATE OF ARIZONA, PURSUANT
TO THE PROVISIONS OF TITLE 9, CHAPTER 4, SEC. 9-471, ARIZONA REVISED
STATUTES AND AMENDMENTS THERETO, BY ANNEXING THERETO CERTAIN
TERRITORY CONTIGUOUS TO THE EXISTING CITY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF
GLENDALE TO BE KNOWN AS ANNEXATION AREA NO. 155.
It was moved by Clark, and seconded by Frate, to approve Ordinance No.
2440 New Series. Motion carried on a roll call vote, with the following
Councilmembers voting "aye": Clark, Goulet, Eggleston, Frate, and Scruggs.
Members voting "nay": none.
13. OFFICIAL SUPPLEMENTARY ZONING MAP ZMA-10
Mr. James May, AICP, Planning Deputy Director, presented this item.
The "Official Zoning Map of the City of Glendale" is part of the Zoning Ordinance
and identifies the official zoning district boundaries for all property within the city. The
zoning district designations on the map can only be formally amended by the City
Council through the adoption of an ordinance.
Staff updates the map to reflect the Council's approval of individual zoning
applications as they are approved. These map updates are then periodically brought to
the City Council for a formal map amendment when rezoning stipulations have been
completed.
The 23 rezoning applications on ZMA-10 were approved by the City Council
between July of 2002 and March of 2005. Official Supplemental Zoning Map ZMA-10
will formally amend the zoning map to reflect these changes.
The community benefits from the formal map amendment by providing an
accurate map of zoning districts citywide.
22
The recommendation was to waive reading beyond the title and adopt the
ordinance for Official Supplementary Zoning Map ZMA-10.
Ordinance No. 2441 New Series was read by number and title only, it being AN
ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
GLENDALE, ARIZONA BY ADOPTING OFFICIAL SUPPLEMENTARY ZONING MAP
ZMA-10, WHICH AMENDS THE ZONING ON SPECIFIC PROPERTIES; AND
ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
It was moved by Frate, and seconded by Goulet, to approve Ordinance No.
2441 New Series. Motion carried on a roll call vote, with the following
Councilmembers voting "aye": Clark, Goulet, Eggleston, Frate, and Scruggs.
Members voting "nay": none.
MOTION TO EXCUSE COUNCILMEMBERS LIEBERMAN AND MARTINEZ
It was moved by Eggleston, and seconded by Clark, to excuse
Councilmembers Lieberman and Martinez from tonight's Council meeting. The
motion carried unanimously.
REQUEST FOR FUTURE WORKSHOP AND EXECUTIVE SESSION
It was moved by Eggleston, and seconded by Frate, to hold a City Council
Workshop at 1:30 p.m. in Room B-3 of the City Council Chambers on Tuesday,
June 7, 2005, to be followed by an Executive Session pursuant to A.R.S. 38-
431.03. The motion carried unanimously.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Mr. Greg Wallace, a resident of the City of Phoenix, stated he is speaking on
behalf of residents of Thoroughbred Farms. He said the helicopter training school at
the Glendale Municipal Airport is disrupting the lives of several hundred residents in the
area. He said Council approved the leases for two separate helicopter flight training
schools at the Glendale Municipal Airport on September 28, 2004 and he is asking
Council to reconsider the renewal of those leases. He asked that the leases for Gold
Coast and Silver State be placed on an upcoming Council agenda for reevaluation. He
said Council was advised by city staff that the operation complied with the 1994 Federal
Aviation Regulation Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study, pointing out Part 150 Section
21D.1 specifies if after submission of the noise exposure map any change in the
operation of the airport that would create an increase of 1.5 decibels or greater in an
area that was previously a compatible use requires submission of a revised noise
exposure map. He said he considers the over 50 flights per day going over his house
as being a significant change in operations and as having an increase in noise of more
than 1.5 decibels. He stated Glendale Airport's noise contour map is dated May 1994
and it is one of the few airports in the metropolitan region that has yet to update any of
23
its maps. He stated the Noise Compatibility Program was approved in 1995 and has
apparently never been updated. He said, since that time, a runway extension and two
helicopter training schools have been added to the airport. He said the airport currently
has no official noise abatement program or official site to register complaints, noting he
was advised to contact the control tower, which he feels, presents a significant safety
concern. He stated he and his neighbors have attempted to work with Councilmember
Clark and Councilmember Maddock from Phoenix, but their efforts have resulted in only
a marginal improvement, which is deemed unsatisfactory. He said, while airports are
not required to conduct noise compatibility studies, specific rules and requirements
must be followed to update a study once one has been conducted. He asked Council
to direct the Airport Manager to explain why the noise compatibility study and noise
exposure map have not been revised based on the significant changes to the physical
layout of the airport and the increase in the number and type of aircraft flights over the
past year.
Mayor Scruggs directed Mr. Beasley to follow up with Mr. Wallace.
COUNCIL COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS
Councilmember Clark stated she held a bi-lingual district meeting last week. She
commented it was a wonderful first step in communicating with the Hispanic community
in Glendale. She thanked all of the bi-lingual staff members who gave up their evening
to share information about their departments.
Vice Mayor Eggleston said a park in his district was the victim of senseless
vandalism and the playground was destroyed by fire. He thanked employees in the
Parks Department and Police and Fire Departments who proactively searched for and
found the person who committed the crime. He stated Beacon Church also suffered a
lot of damage due to fire on Saturday, encouraging citizens to come forward with any
information they may have on the fire.
Councilmember Frate announced the first Water Safety Walk would take place
May 25, noting they will cover the neighborhoods between 59th and 75th Avenues from
Bethany Home to Camelback. He thanked SRP for providing pamphlets and
Southwest Ambulance for providing support.
Mayor Scruggs congratulated Councilmember Clark on her bi-lingual district
meeting, noting Via Del Sol met with the City of Glendale and will begin a program
called "Community Power" to assist Hispanic citizens in learning more about
participating in the City of Glendale. She thanked everyone who was involved with last
Saturday's City Safe Event. She encouraged everyone to attend an event at the
Glendale Civic Center on June 3 from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. during which Governor
Napolitano and her top advisors will make presentations and take questions.
24
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m.
asf,a
Pamela Hanna - City Clerk
25