HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - Minutes - City Council - Meeting Date: 10/14/2003 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA,
HELD TUESDAY, OCTOBER 14, 2003, AT 7:00 P.M.
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Elaine M. Scruggs, with Vice Mayor
Thomas R. Eggleston and the following Councilmembers present: Joyce V. Clark,
Steven E. Frate, David M. Goulet, H. Philip Lieberman, and Manuel D. Martinez.
Also present were Ed Beasley, City Manager; Pam Kavanaugh, Assistant City
Manager; Jon Paladini, Deputy City Attorney; and Pamela Hanna, City Clerk.
COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE VII, SECTION 6(c) OF THE GLENDALE CHARTER
A statement was filed by the City Clerk that the 5 resolutions and 4 ordinances to
be considered at the meeting were available for public examination and the title posted
at City Hall more than 72 hours in advance of the meeting.
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 23, 2003 CITY COUNCIL
MEETING
It was moved by Goulet, and seconded by Clark, to dispense with the
reading of the minutes of the September 23, 2003 Regular City Council meeting,
as each member of the Council had been provided copies in advance, and
approve them as written. The motion carried unanimously.
PROCLAMATIONS AND AWARDS
ARIZONA CITIES AND TOWNS WEEK 2003
This is a request for the City Council to proclaim the week of October 20-26 as
Arizona Cities and Towns Week 2003.
The residents rely on their local government to provide essential services in
order to experience a high quality of life. Through education and awareness it is
important to have citizens, community leaders and city staff work together to maintain
this quality of life.
The recommendation was to present the Arizona Cities and Towns Week
Proclamation to Leo Hauguel.
Mr. Leo Hauguel thanked the Mayor and Council as well as the Police
Department for nominating him for the Proclamation. He encouraged everyone to get
involved in their neighborhoods by joining or instigating a block watch program.
1
CONSENT AGENDA
Mr. Ed Beasley, City Manager, read Agenda Item Numbers 1 through 14 and Ms.
Pamela Hanna, City Clerk, read consent agenda resolutions numbers 15 through 19 by
number and title.
Councilmember Goulet requested item numbers 14 and 15 be heard
separately.
Councilmember Eggleston stated he has a conflict of interest with item number
11 and will abstain from the vote.
Councilmember Martinez requested item number 1 be heard separately.
Councilmember Clark requested item number 6 be heard separately.
2. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT; LIBRARY COMPUTERS
This is a request for City Council to approve a maintenance contract renewal
with DYNIX, Inc., the library's automation vendor, for on-call and preventive
maintenance for software, server, and network components of the computer system.
One of the City Council strategic priorities is leveraging technology for efficiency
and convenience. The maintenance agreement for library computers is designed to
protect the city's extensive investment in automation at all three library facilities. Last
year public access computers registered an average of 836 daily sign-ups, and the
library's electronic resources are available to our citizens at home and work on a 24-
hour basis.
This agreement will provide a method to replace and/or repair broken or
defective equipment within a prescribed period of time, minimizing impact upon internal
operations and external delivery of services; scheduled preventive maintenance to
isolate and correct potential problems; and software upgrades and enhancements.
Equipment covered by the agreement includes three servers and one system printer.
Network components covered include 14 hubs, three routers, and five switches.
DYNIX, Inc. provides proprietary technology with a fixed amount for maintenance
costs based upon the library's configuration of equipment. Due to the customized
hardware and software configuration of the library's current automation system, it is
impossible for any other vendor to maintain the hardware and provide necessary
software upgrades. In Arizona, Mesa Public Library, Apache Junction Public Library,
and Yavapai Library Network use DYNIX, Inc., and each has a similar yearly
maintenance agreement. The library is planning to replace its existing library
automation product within the next year because the vendor is phasing out their current
software product to take advantage of newer technology.
2
This is a maintenance contract that has been renewed annually with this vendor
since 1994.
Budget Impacts & Costs:
Grants Capital One-Time Budgeted Unbudgeted Total
Expense Cost _
$81 ,795.51 $81,795.51
Account Name, Fund, Account and Line Item Number:
Equipment Maintenance Account No. 01-4510-7450
The recommendation was to authorize the renewal of the maintenance contract
with DYNIX, Inc., in the amount of $81 ,795.51.
3. ORCHARD GLEN NEIGHBORHOOD GRANT PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION
ADMINISTRATION SERVICES
This is a request for the City Council to amend a current design services contract
with the Sherman Group, Inc. for an additional $21,063.25 to provide construction and
inspection administration services for the Orchard Glen neighborhood grant
improvements. Actual construction is scheduled to begin early this fall.
The approval of this amendment will facilitate the revitalization of the Orchard
Glen neighborhood and the City Center Master Plan area.
On May 22, 2002, the Sherman Group, Inc. was hired to design streetscaping
and decorative lighting along the east and west sides of 59th Drive from Glendale
Avenue to Lamar Road and from 59th Drive and Lamar Road, east to 59th Avenue for
the Orchard Glen Neighborhood. The original contract totaling $40,000, was for design
only and was reviewed and approved by the Mayor and Council as a part of the Spring
2002 neighborhood grants process. Now that the design work is finished, actual
construction will occur later this fall. The cost to inspect and administer these
construction improvements (by the Sherman Group, Inc.), amounts to an additional
$21,063.25. This will bring the total professional services agreement with the Sherman
Group, Inc. to $61,063.25. Because of this additional amount, formal Council approval
is necessary.
Design and construction funds for the Orchard Glen neighborhood improvement
project were previously approved by the Mayor and City Council as a part of the Fall
2002 Neighborhood Partnership grants process.
The Orchard Glen neighborhood improvement project will further revitalize the
neighborhood and improve the city center area.
3
Budget Impacts & Costs:
Grants Capital One-Time Budgeted U n budgeted Total
Expense Cost
X $21,063.25 $21,063.25
Account Name, Fund, Account and Line Item Number:
Community Development Block Grant Account No. 11-8655-8330
The recommendation was to approve the amendment for construction
administration in the amount of $21 ,063.25.
4. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT-GLENDALE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
EASTSIDE TAXIWAY AND APRON
This is a request for the City Council to approve a professional services
agreement with Z&H Engineering, Inc., to design a new eastside parallel taxiway and
parking apron. This project was approved as part of the Glendale Airport Master Plan
and will support the future development on the east side of the airport.
One of the City Council's strategic priorities is to promote economic
development. With construction of the eastside taxiway and parking apron, the
property on the east side of the airport becomes available for development for large
commercial airport business.
The new eastside taxiway will assist aircraft movement associated with future
development on the east side of the airport. In 1998 the city hired Coffman Associates
to update the Glendale Airport Master Plan. The airport's current number of airport-
based aircraft is 241, with 112,000 operations out of the airport annually. The 1998
master plan forecasts an increase in airport-based aircraft to 288 by 2005 and 403 by
2020, with annual operations predicted to increase to 155,000 and 215,000 by 2005
and 2020, respectively. With the addition of the hockey arena, multi-use stadium and
westside development opportunities these forecasted outcomes will be strengthened.
Engineering staff sent a request for a letter of interest to over 100 professional
engineering firms. Fourteen firms responded that they would like to receive the request
for proposal (RFP). Of those 14 firms, eight submitted a proposal. The proposal review
team, consisting of Glendale Airport, Engineering, and Transportation Department staff,
and two outside aviation representatives, selected Z&H Engineering, Inc. to perform the
required design services.
Council approved the current Airport Master Plan update, which includes the
suggested eastside development and expansion, on January 13, 1998.
4
The Glendale Airport plays a major role in meeting the increasing demand for
aviation services in the West Valley. With the addition of the arena, multi-use facility
and future development opportunities, the need for these services also increases. The
construction to lengthen and widen the airport runway was just recently completed. The
construction of the eastside taxiway and apron area is the next step in developing the
east side of the airport. The growth of the airport will help attract future corporate
businesses to the city and West Valley.
The eastside taxiway was included in the Airport Environmental Assessment
performed for the airport runway expansion project. A public meeting for the
environmental assessment was held on May 3, 2001. Notification of this meeting was
published in the Arizona Republic and the Tribune, however there was no public
attendance.
Ninety percent of the funding for the design of this project is provided by a grant
for the development of public airports from the Federal Aviation Administration. The
remaining 10 percent will be shared by the Arizona Department of Transportation and
the city. The city's share, $9,122, is available in the Go Glendale Transportation Plan,
Fund 25.
Budget Impacts & Costs:
Grants Capital One-Time Budgeted U n budgeted Total
Expense Cost
$157,363 X $9,122 $166,485
Account Name, Fund, Account and Line Item Number:
Parallel Taxiway and Connector Taxiways, Account No. 34-8025-8330, $157,363
Parallel Taxiway and Connector Taxiways, Account No. 25-8064-8330, $9,122
The recommendation was to approve the professional services agreement with
Z&H Engineering, Inc., in the amount of $166,485.
5. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT — 67TH AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS,
CAMELBACK ROAD TO GRAND AVENUE
This is a request for the City Council to approve a professional services
agreement with Kirkham Michael Consulting Engineers for the engineering design and
construction services for street improvements to 67th Avenue between Camelback Road
and Grand Avenue. The reason for the project is to add curb, gutter, sidewalk and
landscaping where needed, improve the intersections at Came!back Road and
Glendale Avenue, add five bus bays with shelters, replace a 30-year-old waterline and
place the existing utility lines underground.
One of the Council's strategic priorities is to improve transportation options in the
city. When voters passed a half-cent increase in the sales tax in 2001 to support
5
transportation projects, staff began to implement the Glendale Onboard (GO) program.
Improvements are being made to streets, transit, intersections, and bicycle and
pedestrian paths.
The City of Glendale's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) has prioritized street
improvements within the city and established funding to construct the improvements. In
November 2001, Glendale voters approved funding for the GO Program for a variety of
transportation projects to enhance the quality of life throughout Glendale. These
intersection improvements and pavement widening projects under the GO Program
include paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, bus bays, landscaping, lighting, signal
modifications, and other street-related improvements. The GO intersections and the
CIP street improvements have been combined into one project.
A recent water system evaluations study on the condition of the existing water
system within the city has indicated that several of the existing waterlines are over 30
years old and should be planned for replacement. The existing 12-inch waterline in 67th
Avenue falls into this category and will be replaced as part of this project.
City Council awarded the half-cent transportation sales tax program development
to URS Corporation in June 2001. Council subsequently approved by ordinance in
February 2002 a Citizen Transportation Oversight Committee (CTOC) to identify
projects for the GO Program. Two intersections in this project were identified by CTOC
for improvements. URS is responsible for the development of design concepts, which
will serve as the basis for the final design. Council also approved this project in the
2003-2013 CIP. Engineering Department staff recently selected several firms to
provide professional engineering services on an on-call basis for design and
construction services. Kirkham Michael Consulting Engineers was selected from this
list.
67th Avenue is a major arterial street within the city that carries in excess of
30,000 vehicles per day. Portions of the street have existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk
while other segments are without improvements. This project will complete the street
improvements between Camelback Road and Grand Avenue as well as convert the
majority of the existing overhead utilities to underground. The improvements will
include bus bays and turn lanes to improve the traffic flow on the street. A 30-year-old
waterline will also be replaced to reduce the chance for leaks, requiring repairs in the
new street.
URS Corporation has made contact with property owners directly impacted by
the improvements. Public meetings were recently conducted at several locations
around the city to inform the public of the projects and to receive comments. Kirkham
Michael will also conduct public information meetings during the final design process
so citizens can see the progress being made and the schedule for the project.
Engineering Department staff negotiated a scope of work and fee for design and
construction services with Kirkham Michael Consulting Engineers in the amount of
6
$998,175. The streets component is $931,213 and is available in Fund 61 (Street
Revenue Bonds) and Fund 25 (Transportation Sales Tax). The waterline component is
$66,962 and funding is available in Fund 83 (Water Subfund).
Funds in the amount of $697,213 for the design and construction services of this
project are available in the Fiscal Years 2003-05 Capital Improvement Program, 67th
Avenue-Camelback Road to Grand Avenue, Account No. 61-9568-8300. Funding for
the waterline improvements is available in the Waterline Replacement Account No. 83-
9249-8300 in the amount of $66,962. Fund transfers are required from Intersection
Improvements, Account No. 25-9448-8300 in the amount of $114,000; from Bus
Pullout, Account No. 25-9446-8300 in the amount of $94,000; and from Lane Drop
Elimination, Account No. 25-9464-8300 in the amount of $26,000 into 67th Avenue-
Camelback Road to Grand Avenue, Account No. 25-9478-8300.
Budget Impacts & Costs:
Grants Capital One-Time Budgeted Unbudgeted Total
Expense Cost
X $998,175 $998,175
Account Name, Fund, Account and Line Item Number:
67th Avenue, Camelback Road to Grand Avenue, Account No. 61-9568-8300, $697,213
67th Avenue, Camelback Road to Grand Avenue, Account No. 25-9478-8300, $234,000
Waterline Replacement, Account No. 83-9249-8300, $66,962
The recommendation was to approve the fund transfer and the Professional
Services Agreement with Kirkham Michael Consulting Engineers in the amount of
$998,175.
7. SOUTH HALF OF MARYLAND AVENUE STREET CONSTRUCTION — 91ST TO
951" AVENUES
This is a request for City Council approval of the construction of the south side of
Maryland Avenue between 91st and 95th avenues. This project is included in the
infrastructure improvements that will be completed to serve the new multi-purpose
facility that will be the future home of the Arizona Cardinals. The original schedule
called for the south half of Maryland Avenue to be completed in fiscal year 2005.
However, staff believes it is in the best interest of the city to have the south side of
Maryland Avenue improved at the same time as the north half. The north half of
Maryland Avenue is being improved as part of the arena project. By advancing the
improvements to the south half of Maryland Avenue, full street improvements will be
ready for the opening in December.
On July 22, 2003 Council adopted a resolution forming a community facilities
district (CFD). The CFD will, among other things, install and construct certain
infrastructure and parking for the multi-purpose facility.
7
The south side of Maryland Avenue was previously scheduled for completion in
the Community Facilities District budget in fiscal year 2005. The arena project only
included the north half of Maryland Avenue. Staff initiated the discussion to expedite
construction of the south side of Maryland Avenue in order to be completed for the
opening of the arena.
With the completion of Maryland Avenue for the arena opening, this will assist
with the loading and unloading of vehicles attending events at the arena.
Staff met with members from the Cardinal and Coyote organizations and has
their full support for the completion of the south half of Maryland Avenue.
On September 10, 2003 a meeting was held with neighborhood representatives
directly east of the stadium site. The group reviewed and was in support of the
improvements and configuration of Maryland Avenue.
Funding for the south half of Maryland Avenue is included in the Community
Facilities District (CFD) budget. However due to the timing of the formation and selling
of bonds, CFD funding will not be available in time to fund the improvements to the
south side of Maryland Avenue prior to the opening of the arena. Therefore, staff has
identified funding in the city's CIP that can be used to temporarily to fund the
improvements for the south half of Maryland Avenue. Once the formation of the district
is completed and the bonds are sold, the city will be reimbursed by the CFD. This
reimbursement is scheduled to occur the end of this calendar year.
Budget Impacts & Costs:
Grants Capital One-Time Budgeted Unbudgeted Total
Expense Cost
$262,130 X *X $262,130
Account Name, Fund, Account and Line Item Number:
Maryland Avenue — South Half Account No. 61-8819-8300
*Funds are currently available in the CIP to fund this project.
The recommendation was to approve construction of the south side of Maryland
Avenue to be paid from account number 61-8819-8300 in the amount of $262,130.
8. FINAL PLAT APPLICATION FP-03-05: PARADISE VISTAS II - 5658 WEST
NORTHERN AVENUE
This is a request by Clouse Engineering for final plat approval for a subdivision
titled Paradise Vistas II.
8
The proposed final plat is consistent with the General Plan and the existing R1-6
(Single Residence) zoning district. The proposed subdivision adds to the city's
residential housing stock by developing a vacant infill property with single-family homes.
This development incorporates sound growth management techniques by utilizing the
surrounding infrastructure.
The site is located on the north side of Northern Avenue, west of 56th Avenue.
The subdivision includes 73 single-family lots on 19.7 acres at a gross density of 3.7
residential dwelling units per acre. Lot sizes vary from 6,564 square feet to 14,040
square feet with an average lot size of 7,329 square feet. The proposed minimum lot
width is 60 feet and the proposed minimum lot depth is 110 feet. This request meets
the requirements of the Subdivision and Minor Land Division Ordinance and meets the
Single Family Residential Design Guidelines.
The Planning Commission approved the preliminary plat for this subdivision on
April 17, 2003. All stipulations of the preliminary plat have been satisfied.
This project transforms the existing vacant inf ill parcel into an attractive
development, provides housing near existing and planned shopping and nearby
amenities and provides for an attractive streetscape along Northern Avenue.
The recommendation was to approve final plat application FP-03-05.
9. FINAL PLAT APPLICATION FP-03-06: CASA DE ENSUENO - 7701 NORTH
83RD AVENUE
This is a request by Bright Angel Trust for final plat approval for a subdivision
titled Casa De Ensueno.
The proposed final plat is consistent with the General Plan and the existing SR-
17 PRD (Suburban Residence, Planned Residential Development) zoning district. The
proposed subdivision provides meaningful growth to the city's residential housing stock
by developing a large lot subdivision for custom homes. It also adds another well-
planned neighborhood to the city's residential housing stock.
The site is located north of the northeast corner of 83rd and Orangewood
avenues. The applicant intends to build a gated subdivision with a private street on this
site with 15 large lots on 11.78 acres at a density of 1 .27 dwelling units per acre. Lot
sizes vary from 22,720 square feet to 32,450 square feet. The proposed minimum lot
width is 122 feet and the proposed minimum lot depth is 158 feet. This request meets
the requirements of the Subdivision and Minor Land Division Ordinance, is consistent
with the proposed Development Plan, and meets the Single Family Residential Design
Guidelines.
The Planning Commission approved the preliminary plat for this subdivision on
May 15, 2003. All stipulations of the preliminary plat have been satisfied.
9
This project transforms the existing vacant parcel into an attractive large-lot
development with custom homes, provides housing near amenities and provides for an
attractive streetscape along 83rd Avenue.
The recommendation was to approve final plat application FP-03-06.
10. LIQUOR LICENSE NO. 3-892 SAL'S PIZZA & PASTA
This is a request by Dennis Basile for the City Council to approve a new series
12 (restaurant) license for Sal's Pizza & Pasta located at 20020 N. 59th Avenue, Suite
103. The previous owner operated this business as Arizona Pizza Café and held a
series 12 license at this location.
The applicant is currently operating this establishment pursuant to an interim
permit issued by the Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses & Control. The approval of
this license will not increase the total number of liquor licenses in this area.
The establishment is over 300 feet from any school or church. The Planning
Department, Police Department, and the Maricopa County Health Department have
reviewed the application and have determined that it meets all technical requirements.
No protests were filed during the 20-day posting period.
The recommendation was to forward a recommendation for approval to the
Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control.
11 . LIQUOR LICENSE NO. 3-893 PARKSIDE EATERY
This is a request by Vanessa Jaacks for the City Council to approve a new series
12 (restaurant) license for Parkside Eatery located at 5739 W. Glendale Avenue. The
previous owner operated this business as Jacka's Alley Grill and held a series 12
license at this location.
The applicant is currently operating this establishment pursuant to an interim
permit issued by the Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses & Control. The approval of
this license will not increase the total number of liquor licenses in this area.
The establishment is over 300 feet from any school or church. The Planning
Department, Police Department, and the Maricopa County Health Department have
reviewed the application and have determined that it meets all technical requirements.
No protests were filed during the 20-day posting period.
The recommendation was to forward a recommendation for approval to the
Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control.
10
12. LIQUOR LICENSE NO. 3-896 GLENDALE ARENA
This is a request by Michael Braden for the City Council to approve a person and
location transfer of a series 6 (on- & off-sale retail, all liquor) license for the Glendale
Arena located at 9400 W. Maryland Avenue. There have been no prior liquor licenses
at this location.
The approval of this license will increase the total number of liquor licenses in
this area by one.
The establishment is over 300 feet from any school or church. The Planning
Department, Police Department, and the Maricopa County Health Department have
reviewed the application and have determined that it meets all technical requirements.
No protests were filed during the 20-day posting period.
The recommendation was to forward a recommendation for approval to the
Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control.
13. LIQUOR LICENSE NO. 3-897 CRAIGER'S RESTAURANT & LOUNGE
This is a request by Craig Kimmell for the City Council to approve a person
transfer of a series 6 (on- & off-sale retail, all liquor) license for Craiger's Restaurant &
Lounge located at 5400 N. 59th Avenue. The previous owner operated this business as
Top Rack and held a series 6 license at this location.
The applicant is currently operating this establishment pursuant to an interim
permit issued by the Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses & Control. The approval of
this license will not increase the total number of liquor licenses in this area.
The establishment is over 300 feet from any school or church. The Planning
Department, Police Department, and the Maricopa County Health Department have
reviewed the application and have determined that it meets all technical requirements.
No protests were filed during the 20-day posting period.
The recommendation was to forward a recommendation for approval to the
Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control.
CONSENT RESOLUTIONS
16. INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR THE LOOP 101/MARYLAND
AVENUE BRIDGE DESIGN CONCEPT AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
This is a request for the City Council to approve an Intergovernmental
Agreement with the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) for the development
11
of the design concept report and environmental assessment of the Maryland Avenue
Bridge over Loop 101.
This request supports the Council strategic priority to create transportation
options. The Maryland Avenue Bridge over Loop 101 will serve as the primary access to
the planned park and ride lot on Maryland near Loop 101. The bridge will provide
additional access to the Glendale sports facilities and the surrounding area, thereby
relieving traffic congestion on Glendale Avenue and 91st Avenue. The bridge will also
provide an alternate bicycle route across Loop 101. The current bicycle route is on
Glendale Avenue.
In November 2001 , Glendale voters approved pedestrian, bicycle, and park and
ride improvements as part of the city's transportation election. The Regional Public
Transportation Authority (RPTA) and ADOT have programmed money for the
construction of a park and ride lot and connecting roadways in the vicinity of Loop
101/Glendale Avenue. In August 2002, the City of Glendale entered into agreements
with the State Tourism and Sports Authority (TSA) and the National Football League
Arizona Cardinals to locate a multi-purpose facility near Loop 101 and Maryland
Avenue. The facility will serve as the home of the Arizona Cardinals and the Fiesta
Bowl beginning with the 2006 football season. The city, RPTA, TSA, and Arizona
Cardinals have studied various alternatives for the location of the park and ride lot,
access to the lot, and access to the sports facilities. The Maryland Avenue Bridge over
Loop 101 is an important component for providing access to these facilities.
Following the November 2001 transportation election, Council directed staff to
begin implementation of the overall transportation plan. Staff has worked with the
RPTA, TSA, and Cardinals representatives on the location, design concepts, and
access for the park and ride lot.
In addition to creating transportation alternatives, this project will help support a
number of additional Council strategic priorities. Moving bicycle traffic from Glendale
Avenue to Maryland Avenue will enhance public safety. The improved access in this
area will help support economic development at Westgate and the surrounding area.
Moving event traffic west directly to 99th Avenue will lessen the impact the arena and
stadium will have on the existing neighborhood east of 91St Avenue. The Maryland
Avenue Bridge is an important component of the transportation system in this part of
Glendale. The success of development in this area will enhance the overall quality of
life for Glendale residents.
The Citizens' Transportation Oversight Commission has recommended the
Maryland and Loop 101 park and ride as part of the Glendale Onboard (GO)
Transportation Program. Staff and Arizona Cardinals representatives met with
representatives of the neighborhood east of the sports facilities to discuss traffic
impacts and proposed roadway improvements.
12
City of Glendale funds for the proposed Loop 101 and Maryland Avenue park
and ride are programmed as part of the GO Transportation Program at an estimated
cost of $950,000. The design concept and environmental studies covered under this
Intergovernmental Agreement will require $200,000 of these funds.
Budget Impacts & Costs:
Grants Capital One-Time Budgeted Unbudgeted Total
Expense Cost
$200,000 X $200,000
Account Name, Fund, Account and Line Item Number:
Park-and-Ride Lot - L101/Glen. Account No. 25-9455-8330
The recommendation was to waive reading beyond the title and adopt a
resolution authorizing the City Manager to sign an Intergovernmental Agreement with
the Arizona Department of Transportation for the development of the design concept
report and environmental assessment of the Maryland Avenue Bridge over Loop 101.
Resolution No. 3708 New Series was read by number and title only, it being A
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE ENTERING INTO OF AN
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE LOOP 101/MARYLAND AVENUE BRIDGE DESIGN
CONCEPT AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
17. INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF PHOENIX FOR
REGIONAL DISPATCH SERVICES
This is a request for City Council to renew an agreement with the City of Phoenix
to provide computer aided dispatching (CAD) to the Glendale Fire Department for FY
2003-04.
Through this contract Glendale is assessed for dispatch services at a rate of
$8.75 per call, based on the previous calendar year's call volume. In 2002, the
Glendale Fire Department was dispatched to 19,913 emergencies, compared to 19,489
in 2001 .
The technical service and maintenance fees are based on the number of pieces
of dispatch equipment deployed in Glendale's fire vehicles. The 56-piece inventory of
equipment included in this agreement is itemized on Exhibit A of the attached contract.
The entire community benefits by Glendale's continued participation in Phoenix's
valley-wide dispatch system. The city receives state-of-the-art technology and dispatch
services without bearing the cost of maintaining and staffing a separate dispatch facility.
13
The budget for dispatch services in FY 2003-04 is $289,886.75, an increase of
$64,978.45 over FY 2002-03. The increase represents $3,710 for dispatching,
$5,268.45 in technical service fees, and the addition of an equipment maintenance fee
of $1,000 each on 56 pieces of equipment.
Budget Impacts & Costs:
Grants Capital One-Time Budgeted Unbudgeted Total
Expense Cost
$289,886.7 $289,886.7
5 5
Account Name, Fund, Account and Line Item Number:
CAD Contract Account No: 01-3330-7330
The recommendation was to waive reading beyond the title and adopt the
resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into an intergovernmental agreement
with the City of Phoenix for regional dispatch services in the amount of $289,886.75 for
FY 2003-04.
Resolution No. 3709 New Series was read by number and title only, it being A
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE ENTERING INTO OF AN
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF PHOENIX PERTAINING
TO THE PARTICIPATION IN THE PHOENIX FIRE DEPARTMENT REGIONAL
DISPATCH SYSTEM IN ORDER TO MORE EFFECTIVELY PROVIDE EMERGENCY
FIRE, MEDICAL AND OTHER SERVICES
18. INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR WESTERN MARICOPA
ENTERPRISE ZONE
This is a request for the City Council to authorize the formation of an enterprise
zone, designate the boundaries of the enterprise zone, and to authorize the city to enter
into an intergovernmental agreement (IGA) with Maricopa County and other
municipalities to establish the enterprise zone commission.
The Western Maricopa Enterprise Zone designation will assist with the City
Council's goal of job creation by enhancing opportunities for private investment within
the designated zone.
The primary goal of the Arizona enterprise zone program is to improve the
economies of distressed areas in the state. The program does this by enhancing
opportunities for private investment in certain areas that are called enterprise zones.
The state and local communities provide incentives to foster investment in these areas,
14
and to reduce or remove unnecessary governmental regulatory barriers to economic
development.
In 1989, the Arizona House and Senate adopted legislation to set up an
enterprise zone program for the State of Arizona. Over the years, the program has
been extended three times and modified repeatedly. In 2001, state legislation was
passed that specified procedures to be followed for the designation of zones when the
2000 census data became available.
The Western Maricopa Enterprise Zone was established by state legislation on
January 1, 1994 for a period of five years. In 1999, a new zone was established with
new boundaries. The existing zone expires in January 2004. The application for the
new Western Maricopa Enterprise Zone is due on October 31, 2003.
The boundary for the new zone includes the cities and towns of Avondale,
Buckeye, El Mirage, Glendale, Goodyear, Guadalupe, Peoria, Phoenix, Surprise,
Tolleson, Youngtown, and the Gila River Indian Community and the County of
Maricopa. Following is the schedule for action by each of the governmental entities:
City of Avondale - October 6 Town of Guadalupe - September 25
Town of Buckeye - October 7 City of Peoria - October 7
City of Phoenix - October 22 City of Surprise - October 9
City of El Mirage - September 25 City of Tolleson - September 23
Gila River Indian Community - October 15 Town of Youngtown - September 18
City of Glendale - October 14 Maricopa County - October 22
City of Goodyear - October 14
March 11, 2003: Resolution No. 3647 approved support of the continuation of
the Arizona Enterprise Zone Program.
October 27, 1998: Resolution No. 3245 approved re-authorization and new
intergovernmental agreement (IGA) for the Western Maricopa Enterprise Zone.
January 9, 1996: Resolution No. 3020 amended IGA for the Western Maricopa
Enterprise Zone Program.
September 14, 1993: Resolution No. 2837 amended the West Maricopa
Enterprise Zone Boundary.
July 27, 1993: resolution No. 2833 approved the West Side Enterprise Zone.
Increased investments in enterprise zones tend to strengthen property values (or
keep property values from falling), and encourage job creation to promote the vitality of
the local economies. There is a direct benefit to businesses within the zone, but also
there is a requirement that a percentage of employees must live within the zone, so it
also benefits citizens with opportunities for employment.
15
The Western Maricopa Enterprise Zone commission has contracted with
WESTMARC to be the zone administrators. The cost of that annual contract is divided
evenly between all the communities participating in the zone. This year there is a one-
time cost to be shared by participating communities for consultant services for research
and mapping necessary for the new application.
Budget Impacts & Costs:
Grants Capital One-Time Budgete Unbudgete Total
Expense Cost d d
$1,700 $1 ,700
Account Name, Fund, Account and Line Item Number:
Economic Development Account No. 01-5409-7330
Waive reading beyond the title and adopt a resolution authorizing the application
for creation of an Enterprise Zone; establishing the boundaries of the Enterprise Zone;
and authorizing the entering into of an intergovernmental agreement with Maricopa
County and other municipalities to establish the Enterprise Zone commission.
Resolution No. 3710 New Series was read by number and title only, it being A
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING THE APPLICATION FOR CREATION OF AN
ENTERPRISE ZONE; ESTABLISHING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE ENTERPRISE
ZONE; AND AUTHORIZING THE ENTERING INTO OF AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL
AGREEMENT WITH MARICOPA COUNTY AND OTHER MUNICIPALITIES TO
ESTABLISH THE ENTERPRISE ZONE COMMISSION
19. GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENT
This is a request for the City Council to approve execution of the Gila River
Indian Community (GRIC) water rights settlement agreement.
The GRIC water rights settlement agreement documents the city's water rights in
the Gila and Salt Rivers.
The Gila River Indian Community reservation was established by an act of
Congress in 1859, and was subsequently expanded in size several times. The
reservation now comprises 372,000 acres. However, the federal government never
quantified the amount of water to which the Gila River Indian Community (Community)
was entitled, and the Community began legal battles as to its water rights in 1924. The
exact quantity and nature of the Community's water rights have been litigated in the
Gila River General Stream Adjudication for the last several years, but no final ruling has
been made. The Community is also involved in enforcement actions in U.S. District
16
Court, regarding the Globe Equity Decree, which determined certain rights to water from
the Gila River. The Community water rights claims potentially threaten the use of
surface water and groundwater by many other water rights claimants and groundwater
uses within Arizona, including the City of Glendale. Final resolution of the Community's
water rights will avoid years of prolonged uncertainty concerning the availability of water
supplies, and the related expense of litigation. City Council has received numerous
updates regarding the progress of the settlement over the years.
After many years of negotiation, several entities have developed a settlement
agreement with the Gila River Indian Community. The parties include the United States
of America; the State of Arizona; the Salt River Project; the Roosevelt Irrigation District;
the Arizona Water Company; the Arizona cities of Casa Grande, Chandler, Coolidge,
Glendale, Goodyear, Mesa, Peoria, Phoenix, Safford, Scottsdale, and Tempe; the
Arizona towns of Florence, Mammoth, Kearney, Duncan and Gilbert; the Maricopa-
Stanfield Irrigation & Drainage District; the Central Arizona Irrigation and Drainage
District; Franklin Irrigation District; the Gila Valley Irrigation District; the San Carlos
Irrigation and Drainage District; the Hohokam Irrigation and Drainage District; the
Arlington Canal Company; the Buckeye Irrigation Company; the Buckeye Water
Conservation and Drainage District; the Central Arizona Water Conservation District;
the Phelps Dodge Corporation and the Arizona Game and Fish Commission.
The parties have agreed to provide certain water resources and other resources
to the Community, and not to contest the Community's use of other water resources. In
exchange, the Community, and the United States as trustee for the Community, agree
to waive claims that could potentially diminish the other parties' (non-Indian parties)
own use of water.
The Settlement Agreement, which is considered permanent, will become
enforceable upon the occurrence of several events which are specified in the
authorizing Arizona Water Settlement Act (Act). The Act which was introduced in
Congress on February 23, 2003, provides for adjustments to the Central Arizona
Project (CAP), as well as authorizing the Gila River Indian Community water rights
settlement.
Of particular interest to the City of Glendale are the provisions of the Act relating
to the cities' receipt and use of CAP water. Pursuant to the Act, Glendale will receive
3,053 acre feet of reallocated municipal and industrial (M&I) priority CAP water.
Glendale's water delivery subcontracts will be extended for 100 years and such
contracts will be recognized as "permanent service" subcontracts. The annual capital
repayment charge for M&I water also is now in the process of being substantially
reduced based upon this settlement. The city also has the potential opportunity to
lease Gila River Indian Community CAP water in the future. The settlement agreement
and the Act also provide clarity regarding how shortages are shared among CAP users
thereby potentially avoiding protracted future litigation.
17
The settlement process also has resulted in the Arizona Department of Water
Resources adopting a rule that allows cities to include Indian lease water as part of their
assured water supply calculations.
Because of the size of the agreement and related documents, it is not attached
to this communication. It is available for inspection in the City Clerk's Office.
The City Council has periodically received updates over the years regarding the
progress of the adjudication and settlement.
The settlement protects Glendale's substantial Salt River Project surface water
rights from the substantial claims of the Gila River Indian Community. A negotiated
settlement of the Gila River Indian Community's water rights claims also avoids future
litigation costs. This cost savings can't be estimated, but we anticipate that, without a
settlement, litigation costs would be substantial.
The Superior Court Special Master has held numerous hearings throughout the
Salt and Gila River watersheds over the past 10 years.
Entering into this GRIC water rights settlement agreement has the potential
opportunity to lease 3,053 acre feet of Gila River Indian Community CAP water in the
future and reduce the current adjudication legal fees and costs. The budgeted
adjudication legal fees will cover any costs associated with the proposed settlement.
Budget Impacts & Costs:
Grants Capital One-Time Budgeted Unbudgeted Total
Expense Cost
$32,500 $32,500
Account Name, Fund, Account and Line Item Number:
Professional & Contractual Account No. 01-1510-7330
Waive reading beyond the title and adopt a resolution authorizing the entering
into of the Gila River Indian Community Water Rights Settlement Agreement.
Resolution No. 3711 New Series was read by number and title only, it being A
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE ENTERING INTO OF
THE GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE WATER RIGHTS IN THE SALT AND GILA
RIVERS
Mayor Scruggs opened the public hearing on the Consent Agenda and
Consent Resolution Items nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 16 through 19.
18
Mr. Leonard Clark, a resident of the City of Glendale Barrel District, thanked the
Mayor and Council for the Orchard Glen Neighborhood Grant Project. He said infill
projects help save desert lands on the outskirts of the city. He voiced his support of the
Intergovernmental Agreement for the Loop 101/Maryland Avenue Bridge Design
Concept. He said the Western Maricopa Enterprise Zone Intergovernmental
Agreement and the Gila River Indian Community water rights settlement agreement will
be good for the city.
Mayor Scruggs closed the public hearing.
It was moved by Lieberman and seconded by Clark, to approve the
recommended actions on Consent Agenda Item Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12,
13, and 16 through 19, including the approval and adoption of Resolution No.
3708 New Series, Resolution No. 3709 New Series, Resolution No. 3710 New
Series, and Resolution No. 3711 New Series, and to forward Liquor License
Applications No. 3-892 for Sal's Pizza & Pasta, No. 3-893 for Parkside Eatery, No.
3-896 for Glendale Arena, and No. 3-897 for Craiger's Restaurant & Lounge to the
State of Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control, with the
recommendation for approval.
Mayor Scruggs pointed out Vice Mayor Eggleston would not be allowed to vote
on any of the items unless Item 11, for which Vice Mayor Eggleston declared a conflict
of interest, was removed from the motion.
An Amended Motion was made by Lieberman and seconded by Clark to
approve the recommended actions on Consent Agenda Item Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9,
10, 12, 13, and 16 through 19, including the approval and adoption of Resolution
No. 3708 New Series, Resolution No. 3709 New Series, Resolution No. 3710 New
Series, and Resolution No. 3711 New Series, and to forward Liquor License
Applications No. 3-892 for Sal's Pizza & Pasta, No. 3-893 for Parkside Eatery, No.
3-896 for Glendale Arena, and No. 3-897 for Craiger's Restaurant & Lounge to the
State of Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control, with the
recommendation for approval. The motion carried unanimously.
It was moved by Lieberman and seconded by Clark to approve the
recommended actions on Item No. 11. Motion carried on a roll call vote, with the
following Councilmembers voting "aye": Clark, Goulet, Lieberman, Martinez,
Frate, and Scruggs. Councilmember Eggleston abstained from voting.
1. AWARD OF PROPOSAL 03-22, SOLID WASTE CONSULTING SERVICES
Mr. Stuart Kent, Field Operations Deputy Director, presented this item.
This is a request for the City Council to approve the award of proposal for solid
waste consulting services.
19
Consistent with the Council goals of providing financial stability and coordinating
exceptional service delivery, the contractor will assess both the financial and
operational efficiency of the landfill, recycling, and refuse collection operations.
Solicitations were requested from 40 vendors to provide the city with professional
solid waste consulting services, and 10 vendors came to the pre-proposal conference.
Two proposals were received. An evaluation committee consisting of staff from field
operations, finance, budget and engineering reviewed the offers received. Specific
evaluation factors included project approach, operational and financial competency,
documentation preparation, meetings and presentations, references and cost. The offer
scored highest by the committee was submitted by R.W. Beck Incorporated.
R.W. Beck Incorporated will focus their efforts on identifying opportunities and
consequences regarding four key issues: Should the city continue to provide
commercial sanitation services, should the city consider contracting out the operation of
the landfill, should the city contract out the operation of the materials recovery facility,
and should the city consider contracting out the collection of loose trash. The
consultant will also complete a solid waste rate analysis projection for the next five
years.
Staff presented a solid waste assessment to the City Council on May 6, 2003.
During this meeting the key issues for further study were identified.
Professional and independent assessments of any operation are an excellent
way to review current operating procedures, identify financial opportunities or
constraints, and determine if changes in a program or service are warranted.
Staff will work closely with R.W. Beck to ensure data collected is accurate and
interpreted correctly. It is estimated that the consultant will spend 950 hours gathering
and analyzing data and preparing the final report.
Budget Impacts & Costs:
Grants Capital One-Time Budgeted Unbudgeted Total
Expense Cost
X $123,900 $123,900
Account Name, Fund, Account and Line Item Number:
Solid Waste Administration, Account No. 55-6281-7330
The recommendation was to award the proposal 03-22 for solid waste consulting
services to R.W. Beck Incorporated in an amount not to exceed $123,900, taxes
included.
20
In response to Councilmember Martinez's question, Mr. Kent explained, while
URS's bid was approximately $14,000 lower, cost is only one component of the
evaluation and R.W. Beck was found to be the most responsive bidder across all of the
criteria.
It was moved by Martinez and seconded by Frate, to approve the
recommended actions on Consent Agenda Item No. 1. The motion carried
unanimously.
6. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT — ZONE 4 WATER TREATMENT
PLANT
Mr. Craig Johnson, Assistant City Engineer, presented this item.
This is a request for the City Council to approve a professional services
agreement with the firm of Black & Veatch for performance of the engineering services
needed to complete the site selection and design of the Zone 4 Water Treatment Plant.
This project was recommended in the City of Glendale Water Treatment System Needs
Study and will support future development in the primary service area west of 75th
Avenue and south of Northern Avenue.
The Zone 4 Water Treatment Plant will provide a new source of drinking water
with state-of-the-art technology, enhance the quality of life for Glendale residents, help
ensure public health and promote economic development.
In May 2001, Black & Veatch completed the City of Glendale Water Treatment
System Needs Study. The study recommended that a new western Glendale water
treatment plant be constructed by 2005. The water system needs were further defined
and refined in the Comprehensive Water Facilities Planning and Design Project —
Phase I completed in September 2003. The results of this project recommend that the
proposed Zone 4 Water Treatment Plant be constructed with an initial capacity of 10
million gallons per day (expandable to 20 million gallons per day) and that it be built in
the vicinity of 71st and Northern avenues. The proposed Zone 4 Water Treatment Plant
is to be in service by the end of 2006.
On May 14, 2002, City Council approved a professional services agreement with
Black & Veatch for completion of the Comprehensive Water Facilities Planning and
Design Project— Phase I.
The proposed Zone 4 Water Treatment Plant will provide a new state-of-the-art
drinking water source for western Glendale and the City Center Master Plan area.
Currently, the Cholla Water Treatment Plant provides the majority of the drinking water
served in these areas.
21
As part of the Phase I work, a list of potential sites for the Zone 4 Water
Treatment Plant was developed. This list was narrowed down to two sites that were
found to have the best overall potential for the plant. On September 15, 2003, a public
open house was held to allow property owners and residents in the vicinity of these two
sites the opportunity to get information about the site selection process, the proposed
water treatment plant and any other issues of concern.
The Engineering Department staff negotiated a scope of work and fee for the
services to be performed under this agreement, which include site acquisition
assistance, as well as preliminary and final design services for the facilities listed above
in the amount of $4,236,440. Funds for these services are available in Utilities
Department Additional Water Storage, Account No. 83-8056-8300.
Grants Capital One-Time Budgeted Unbudgeted Total
Expense Cost _
X $4,236,440 $4,236,440
Account Name, Fund, Account and Line Item Number:
Utilities Department Additional Water Capacity Account No. 83-8056-8300
The recommendation was to approve the professional services agreement with
Black & Veatch in the amount of $4,236,440.
Councilmember Clark asked how will the plant be financed and if Council will
further discuss the issue when it considers water rates and needs at its November
workshop. Mr. Johnson explained the plant was approved as part of last year's Capital
Improvement Program, therefore, it does not need to be tied to Council's discussion at
the November workshop.
Mr. Johnson clarified for Vice Mayor Eggleston that the $4.2 million for Design
Work includes selection of the site, however, acquisition of the property will be subject
to a separate Council action. He explained the plant will be primarily used for SRP
surface water to be delivered to the western area, however, groundwater treatment
capabilities will be added in the future. Vice Mayor Eggleston asked if the second
phase will increase capacity from the 10 million gallons per day expected in the first
phase to 20 million gallons per day. Mr. Johnson responded yes. He assured the
Council that plans for future expansion will be taken into consideration during the
design stage. Vice Mayor Eggleston asked if the additional capacity is necessary to
allow the city to expand to 115th Avenue. Mr. Johnson answered yes.
Councilmember Lieberman asked if a decision has been made with regard to the
final site. Mr. Johnson said a final decision will be made once the appraisals have been
completed.
22
Councilmember Clark asked if the proposed plant was part of the first study
conducted by Black & Veatch wherein sewer rates were increased four percent for
three consecutive years.
With regard to Vice Mayor Eggleston's question concerning expansion to 115th
Avenue, Mr. Ken Reedy explained the needs assessment indicates additional capacity
will be needed. He said the proposed project will provide the necessary capacity to
fulfill the city's immediate need and allow it to grow. Mr. Meyer of Black and Veatch,
responded the first study included the design and construction costs of this plant.
Mayor Scruggs asked if the 2001 study took the city's new General Plan into
consideration. Mr. Meyer explained the 2001 study looked only at the western part of
the city, whereas the 2003 study was a comprehensive look at the entire city. Mayor
Scruggs pointed out the changes to the General Plan occurred in the western area. Mr.
Meyers explained that, while the General Plan was being updated when they conducted
the 2001 study, they did take some of the changes and population projections from the
new General Plan into consideration towards the end of the study. He reiterated,
however, that the 2001 study did not look at the city as a whole and how the water
treatment plants and wells interact with each other. Mayor Scruggs asked if Council's
approval of the proposed plant would also approve at least one of the groundwater
treatment plants discussed during the Council's last workshop. Mr. Meyer explained
approval would be strictly for the 10 million gallon surface water treatment plant.
In response to Councilmember Clark's question, Mr. Meyer explained the
expansion to 20 million gallons per day also relates solely to surface water. He clarified
future capacity was not part of the original design, however, provisions will be onsite to
allow for future expansion.
Mayor Scruggs asked for clarification as to whether the site will be designed for
the future addition of groundwater treatment. Mr. Meyer said the future addition relates
to surface water, however, the site is overall master planned to accommodate a 10mgd
groundwater treatment facility in the future. Mayor Scruggs asked if the money for land
acquisition and construction is in the current funded CIP and if those costs were part of
the 2001 Black & Veatch study. Mr. Johnson explained the CIP has funding
appropriated in this year for Black & Veatch's service, as well as the purchase of the
property. He stated funds for construction have been appropriated in the 2004, 2005
and 2006 CIP.
Mr. Reedy noted staff will discuss the needs assessment and proposed rate
increases at Council's November 4 workshop. Mayor Scruggs expressed concern
about approving a plant that is dependent upon rate increases the Council has not yet
accepted. Mr. Reedy explained funding for the proposed project is available and part of
the previously approved list of CIP projects. He confirmed for Mayor Scruggs that the
project will not contribute to future rate increases.
23
Councilmember Clark asked if construction of the plant is in any way dependent
upon the suggested rate increases proposed by Black & Veatch in its May 2003 letter.
Mr. Reedy answered no.
It was moved by Clark and seconded by Lieberman, to approve the
recommended actions on Consent Agenda Item No. 6. The motion carried
unanimously.
14. LIQUOR LICENSE NO. 3-898 SUPER CARNICERIA SAN MARTIN
Mr. Michael Bailey, Regulatory and Communications Manager, presented this
item.
This is a request by Jaime Ramos for the City Council to approve a new series
10 (off-sale retail, beer & wine) license for Super Carniceria San Martin located at 6114
N. 59th Avenue. There have been no prior liquor licenses at this location.
The approval of this license will increase the total number of liquor licenses in
this area by one.
The establishment is over 300 feet from any school or church. The Planning
Department, Police Department, and the Maricopa County Health Department have
reviewed the application and have determined that it meets all technical requirements.
One protest was received during the 20-day posting period. The basis for the
protest is concern that adding another liquor license to a neighborhood that already has
existing problems with drugs, crime, and homeless people will further increase
problems.
The recommendation was to forward a recommendation for approval to the
Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control.
Councilmember Goulet asked if the number of existing licenses in a given area is
disclosed to applicants requesting a license. Mr. Bailey responded yes. He stated the
applicant in this case was informed that 40 licenses, including 12 Series 10 licenses,
already exist in the surrounding one mile radius. Councilmember Goulet asked if staff
discusses with the applicant the number of calls for service and alarm activations
recorded for a particular location when an application is submitted. Mr. Bailey said it
generally depends on the reasons behind the calls for service. Councilmember Goulet
asked if staff felt compelled to discuss the 36 non-criminal activities and 69 alarm
activations recorded with the applicant in this case. Mr. Bailey said, since the calls were
based primarily on non-criminal and alarm activities, they were not concerned.
Mr. Jaime Ramos, through Mr. Martin Vasquez, Management Intern, interpreting,
offered to answer questions.
24
Councilmember Goulet asked what need exists that justifies the addition of
another Series 10 license to this area. Mr. Ramos's, through his interpreter, explained
the public has requested that he obtain a liquor license for his store. Councilmember
Goulet asked how long has the applicant owned the store. Mr. Ramos indicated three
months. Councilmember Goulet asked if he is familiar with any of the calls for service
recorded for that location. Mr. Ramos' responded yes.
Councilmember Clark noted the previous owner was denied a similar request
four years ago because there was no need for another Series 10 license. She asked if
Mr. Ramos was informed by the seller of their previous attempt to obtain a license when
he purchased the store. Mr. Ramos' interpreter explained the previous owner did not
follow through on the license application. Councilmember Clark asked if the need has
only been identified in the past three months. Mr. Ramos' interpreter clarified this is the
first application filed within the past four years.
Councilmember Lieberman asked if another Series 10 license is located within
the same shopping center. Mr. Ramos' interpreter stated Food City has a license,
however, it is further than 150 feet from the store.
Councilmember Martinez asked if Mr. Ramos owns other Carnicerias. Mr.
Ramos' interpreter responded no. Councilmember Martinez asked if other Carnicerias
locations have licenses. Mr. Ramos' interpreter said he believe so.
Mr. Bailey clarified three other Series 10 licenses exist within 500 to 600 feet of
the applicant's store. He explained the subject location was previously a market,
however, it did not have a liquor license. Mayor Scruggs asked if Mr. Ramos was
aware that the market did not have a liquor license at the time he purchased the store.
Mr. Ramos responded yes.
It was moved by Goulet and seconded by Clark, to forward Liquor License
Applications No. 3-898 for Super Carniceria San Martin to the State of Arizona
Department of Liquor Licenses and Control, with the recommendation for denial.
Councilmember Clark stated granting of the license would meet no compelling
need for that area of the city.
Councilmember Goulet agreed, explaining the neighborhood has made
significant efforts to improve the area. He noted two registered neighborhoods west
and north of the subject site are opposed to additional liquor licenses because of the
significantly negative impact they would have on the area.
Councilmember Lieberman pointed out seven Series 6 licenses also exist in the
area. He expressed his opinion the neighborhood already has more than enough
establishments that sell liquor.
25
Mayor Scruggs reiterated there are three other Series 10 liquor licenses within
500 to 600 feet of the establishment.
The motion carried unanimously.
15. INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A MULTI-USE PATHWAY
Ms. Debbie Burdett, Associate Traffic Engineer, presented this item.
This is a request for the City Council to approve an Intergovernmental
Agreement (IGA) with the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) for
construction of a multi-use pathway through the Thunderbird Paseo. The new path will
connect the existing Marshall Ranch pathway to the Sweetwater Avenue bicycle route
using a federally funded grant.
This project will help the city in meeting the Council strategic priorities of
ensuring public safety and awareness, creating transportation options, and enhancing
quality of life. Installing a hardscape surface to cross the Thunderbird Paseo near
Marshall Ranch Elementary School will ensure public safety and awareness. In
addition, completing this gap in the 55th Avenue bicycle route will encourage bicycling
and walking as viable transportation options. Creating transportation options and
increasing the comfort of users through shaded rest areas and drinking fountains will
also enhance the quality of life for Glendale residents and visitors.
The project includes construction of an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
approved pathway across the Arizona Canal Diversion Channel (ACDC) and Salt River
Project (SRP) Arizona Canal property. Enhancements to the Thunderbird Paseo Park
area will be accomplished through the addition of park benches, a drinking fountain,
and landscaping along the pathway. The pathway will include a box culvert crossing of
the low flow channel. Currently, the ACDC and low flow channel are barriers for
pedestrians and bicyclists. Having a path linking the north and south legs of the 55th
Avenue bicycle system at the Marshall Ranch/Sweetwater Avenue location has been a
top priority of the Glendale Bicycle Advisory Committee and is key to providing a safe
and convenient connection to homes, schools, and businesses in the area.
In June 2000, Council approved funds for a design contract with INCA
Engineers, Inc. to complete preliminary and final design.
By providing a connection to the existing Marshall Ranch Bridge over the Arizona
Canal, this new pathway will introduce a convenient means of crossing the Thunderbird
Paseo, resulting in shorter commute times for 55th Avenue bikeway corridor users.
Rest areas on each end of the pathway will give users a shaded place to rest and relax.
This project was originally developed at the request of the Glendale Bicycle
Advisory Committee. The design concept report and project plans have been reviewed
26
and presented at regularly scheduled committee meetings. Also, a public meeting was
held in November 2001 to discuss the project with area residents. Meeting notices
were distributed via flyer to Bicycle Advisory Committee members as well as parents of
children who attend Marshall Ranch Elementary School. In addition, a notice was
printed in the Glendale Star in October 2001. Those in attendance were in support of
the project and the selected pathway alignment.
The fee for construction of the project is $603,976. Funds in the amount of
$282,400 for construction are available through a Federal Congestion Mitigation and Air
Quality (CMAQ) grant, while an additional $272,107 in Transportation Enhancement
grant funds are also available. The city's required contribution for matching funds is
$49,469.
Grants Capital One-Time Budgeted Unbudgeted Total
Expense Cost
$554,507 $49,469 X $603,976
Account Name, Fund, Account and Line Item Number:
Street Construction Account No. 31-9431-8300
The recommendation was to waive reading beyond the title and adopt a
resolution authorizing the City Manager to sign any and all documentation relating to
this Intergovernmental Agreement.
Resolution No. 3707 New Series was read by number and title only, it being A
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE ENTERING INTO OF AN
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MULTI-USE PATH ACROSS
THUNDERBIRD PASEO PARK AT 55TH AVENUE AND MARSHALL ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL AT THE ARIZONA CANAL DIVERSION CHANNEL IN THE CITY OF
GLENDALE
Ms. Burdett confirmed for Councilmember Frate that the city accepted the same
grant four years ago for the bridge over the low-flow channel. Councilmember Frate
asked when will the bridge actually be built. Ms. Burdett explained the project is
awaiting federal approval of the design, stating, however, they expect ADOT to award
the contract and begin construction in the Spring of 2004. She said they have not yet
determined how long it will take to construct.
Mayor Scruggs explained the city is using CMAQ funds and Transportation
Enhancement Funds. She asked if the city had to compete with other cities to obtain
the funds. Ms. Burdett responded yes. Mayor Scruggs asked staff to prepare a
chronology of how the project slipped off schedule.
27
Councilmember Lieberman noted Glendale is only bearing 8.5 percent of the
cost of the project.
Councilmember Frate pointed out the bridge will now meet ADA requirements as
an approved trail.
It was moved by Frate, and seconded by Clark, to pass, adopt and approve
Resolution No. 3707 New Series. The motion carried unanimously.
ORDINANCES
20. AIRPORT LAND LEASES FOR HANGAR DEVELOPMENT
Mr. Mark Ripley, Airport Manager, presented this item.
This is a request for the City Council to approve three land lease agreements for
the three remaining parcels in the north hangar complex at the Glendale Airport to Mike
Ruiz dba Advanced Real Estate Resources, Inc. and Glendale Airpark Hangars, LLC.
One of Council's strategic priorities is to promote economic development. This
hangar development is being marketed to corporate executives and professionals
whose relocation to Glendale will enhance a growing business sector.
The city issued a request for proposal for the three remaining parcels of land in
the north hangar complex to complete the development.
The city received two proposals on parcel 1 and three proposals on parcels 4
and 7. A review panel individually scored the proposals and Mr. Ruiz's proposals
scored the highest on all three parcels.
Mr. Ruiz proposes building large executive hangars on the two largest parcels,
minimum of seven hangars on the next to largest parcel and a minimum of eight
hangars on the largest parcel and a combination hangar/office, minimum of one, on the
smaller parcel.
The lease term for all three parcels is 20 years with two 10-year options. The
leases incorporate an initial construction period that is active until the date a certificate
of occupancy is issued on the first hangar, at that time the 20-year term will take effect.
The initial annual lease rate for parcel 1 is $1,447.50, with an increase to
$2,895.00 on the date a certificate of occupancy is issued for the hangar/office. The
initial annual lease rate for parcel 4 is $2,742.00, with an increase to $5,484.00 on the
date a certificate of occupancy is issued on the first hangar. The initial annual lease
rate for parcel 7 is $3,568.00, with an increase to $7,136.00 on the date a certificate of
occupancy is issued on the first hangar.
28
There will be a Consumer Price Index adjustment at the end of each year during
the full term of these leases.
The Council approved similar agreements in January 1996, March 1998 and
January, April and June of 1999.
Adequate aircraft storage facilities is important in meeting the needs of
executives and professionals relocating to Glendale. As the city works at attracting new
business to the western part of the city, the airport becomes a very valuable marketing
tool. Having an airport near a commercial development makes it far more attractive to
companies that want to locate retail, satellite offices or corporate headquarters.
The Aviation Advisory Commission reviewed Mr. Ruiz's proposals and voted
unanimously on January 22, 2003, to recommend to Council approval of the lease
agreements.
The recommendation was to waive reading beyond the title and adopt an
ordinance authorizing the leasing of land at the Glendale Municipal Airport to Advanced
Real Estate Resources, Inc. and Glendale Airpark Hangars, LLC.
Ordinance No. 2343 New Series was read by number and title only, it being AN
ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND/OR CITY
MANAGER AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THREE LAND LEASE AGREEMENTS
FOR HANGAR DEVELOPMENT AT THE GLENDALE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Councilmember Goulet asked when will the leases start. Mr. Ripley explained
the lease agreements range from one year to 18 months.
Mayor Scruggs opened the public hearing on Item 20.
Mr. Leonard Clark, a resident of the City of Glendale Barrel District, commended
the Council for its vision, expressing his opinion the airport's ability to cater to a larger
corporate clientele will encourage growth in Glendale. He urged the city to ensure the
highest security measures are employed.
Mayor Scruggs closed the public hearing.
It was moved by Frate, and seconded by Martinez, to approve Ordinance
No. 2343 New Series. Motion carried on a roll call vote, with the following
Councilmembers voting "aye": Clark, Goulet, Lieberman, Eggleston, Martinez,
Frate, and Scruggs. Members voting "nay": none.
21 . SALT RIVER PROJECT IRRIGATION EASEMENT, SOUTHWEST CORNER
OF 918' AND MARYLAND AVENUES
29
Ms. Kathie Sholly, Property Manager, presented this item.
This is a request for City Council to grant an irrigation easement in favor of Salt
River Project (SRP) for relocation of their facilities to accommodate the construction of
Maryland Avenue for the arena development. The easement consists of approximately
1,269 square feet, and is located within the south half of Maryland Avenue, west of 91st
Avenue.
The City Council supports the development of the Coyotes Hockey Arena and
the Cardinals Multi-use Stadium. Granting this easement accommodates construction
of the infrastructure that supports development of these facilities. Granting the
easement accommodates roadway design that improves traffic circulation in and
around the development.
As part of the ongoing development of the Coyotes and Cardinals complexes,
SRP is relocating and undergrounding its irrigation facilities as needed to accommodate
the development. As needs to relocate are identified, requests for easements for the
new facilities are brought forward.
Waive reading beyond the title and adopt an ordinance authorizing the City
Manager to execute an irrigation easement in favor of Salt River Project.
Ordinance No. 2344 New Series was read by number and title only, it being AN
ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA, ORDINANCE NO. 2344 NEW SERIES. AN ORDINANCE OF
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA,
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN IRRIGATION EASEMENT
ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 91ST AND MARYLAND AVENUES IN FAVOR
OF SALT RIVER PROJECT TO PROVIDE SERVICE TO THE COYOTES AND
CARDINALS DEVELOPMENTS; AND ORDERING THAT A CERTIFIED COPY OF
THIS ORDINANCE BE RECORDED
It was moved by Clark, and seconded by Lieberman, to approve Ordinance
No. 2344 New Series. Motion carried on a roll call vote, with the following
Councilmembers voting "aye": Clark, Goulet, Lieberman, Eggleston, Martinez,
Frate, and Scruggs. Members voting "nay": none.
22. CHANGE IN LOOSE TRASH SET-OUT SCHEDULE REMOVE FROM THE
TABLE)
It was moved by Lieberman and seconded by Clark to remove item No. 22
from the table. The motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Stuart Kent, Field Operations Deputy Director, presented this item.
30
This is a request for the City Council to approve an ordinance amending the
Glendale City Code related to the collection of loose trash. Adoption of this ordinance
will reduce the number of days residents may place loose trash out for collection from
seven days to two days. Because many residents use the service infrequently, staff is
recommending that the change be initiated in January 2004, thereby making the
effective date of the ordinance December 26, 2003.
By reducing the number of days loose trash may be set-out for collection, visual
blight will be reduced as will opportunities for scavenging and debris piles being set on
fire. This will assist in projecting a positive image of the city and enhance the quality of
life for Glendale residents.
During the May 6, 2003 City Council workshop, staff presented a
recommendation to reduce the number of days residents may place loose trash out for
collection, from one week prior to the scheduled service week, to the weekend prior to
the service week. The weekend is being defined as starting at 6:00 A.M. Saturday.
The City Council concurred with this recommendation and staff was directed to make
the necessary operational and ordinance changes.
This item was tabled at the September 23, 2003 City Council meeting to the
October 14, 2003 City Council meeting.
The proposed change to the set-out schedule for loose trash was also discussed
at the May 6, 2003 City Council workshop.
The City Council is committed to improving the image of Glendale and to
preserving neighborhoods. By reducing the number of days that loose trash can be set-
out prior to collection, residents will notice less visual blight. This proposed change is
also consistent with the recently adopted property maintenance codes.
The proposed change was advertised in five different area newspapers,
announced in the past two issues of the Glendale Connection, has been the subject of
several newspaper articles, and has been included in several neighborhood
newsletters. Additional announcements, advertising, and meetings with neighborhood
associations are planned for the remainder of the calendar year.
Remove from table, waive reading beyond title and adopt an ordinance changing
the set-out time for the collection of loose trash.
Ordinance No. 2345 New Series was read by number and title only, it being AN
ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING GLENDALE CITY CODE, CHAPTER 18, ARTICLE
III, SECTION 18-110 RELATING TO SET OUT TIMES FOR THE COLLECTION OF
UNCONTAINED REFUSE; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
31
It was moved by Lieberman and seconded by Clark to remove Ordinance
No. 2345, New Series from the table. The motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Scruggs opened the public hearing on Item 21.
Ms. Robin Berrvhill, a resident of the City of Glendale Ocotillo District, expressed
her opinion the amendment is unfair, suggesting it be delayed for further study and until
after the city's annual clean up to allow citizen's to comply with new property
maintenance codes. She stated the restrictions should not apply to homes served by
alleys as alleys are intended for storing trash. A written copy of her comments was
submitted for the record.
Mayor Scruggs closed the public hearing.
It was moved by Goulet and seconded by Frate, to approve Ordinance No.
2345 New Series.
Councilmember Clark asked that the motion be amended to adopt the ordinance
modifying Section 18-110c to read "No resident shall place uncontained refuse out for
collection earlier than Thursday of the week proceeding the scheduled pick up week.
Councilmember Lieberman agreed.
Goulet amended his original motion, modifying Section 18-110c of the
Ordinance to read: "No resident shall place uncontained refuse out for collection
earlier than Thursday of the week proceeding the scheduled pick up week.
Councilmember Frate seconded the amended motion.
Councilmember Goulet clarified alleys were designed as an access to property,
not to store garbage.
Councilmember Martinez asked about changes in the number of trips a
household is allowed to make to the landfill. Mr. Kent stated staff is working on the
proposed landfill changes and will bring them to the Council's next workshop. He
explained the current ordinance allows residents to deposit one load of up to 2,000 lbs
each month free of charge. He said any amount over 2,000 lbs is charged at a
residential rate of $19.80/ton. He stated the proposed change would allow residents to
deposit an unlimited number of loads, each weighing up to 2,000 lbs, free of charge.
He explained the proposal is being brought forward for a number of reasons, but,
primarily to eliminate the need to track the amount of trash deposited by each resident.
Mayor Scruggs pointed out there have been a number of citizen complaints
regarding current landfill procedures.
Councilmember Clark said she received a number of calls from citizens,
particularly senior citizens, who felt a loose trash pick-up allowing two days prior to the
pick-up week would be a hardship. She stated she and staff originally explored the idea
32
of an exemption for senior and disabled citizens, however, they could not find a way to
make that work. She said, consequently, Mr. Reedy suggested they decrease the
number of days to four or five with the possibility of lowering it to two days in the future.
Councilmember Martinez voiced his opposition to the amended motion, stating
he has received calls from citizens and homeowners associations in support of the
shortened timeframe.
Councilmember Frate stated he received six calls from people who wanted the
timeframe to remain seven days. He said registered neighborhood leaders in his
district support the two day timeframe. He questioned what benefit a four day
timeframe would have, suggesting it would only increase the workload for inspectors.
Vice Mayor Eggleston asked if not allowing people to put refuse out prior to 6:00
a.m. on the Saturday before pickup will lighten the inspectors' workloads. Mr. Kent
explained the city's inspectors do not work on weekends. He said, while they will work
with whatever Council decides, staff continues to recommend moving to a two day
timeframe, pointing out it works towards Council's goal of preserving neighborhoods.
Councilmember Lieberman said he could support the amended motion. He
asked how the city intends to inform residents of the change.
Mayor Scruggs stated she empathizes with both the proponents and opponents
of the change. She said, however, she supports the amended motion because it will
provide citizens more flexibility.
Councilmember Martinez noted receiving calls when Council was discussing the
budget, suggesting the city eliminate or reduce the schedule of its loose trash pickup.
He said the presence of loose trash is bad for neighborhoods and results in visual
blight. He said, therefore, he will not support the amended motion.
Upon a call for the question, the motion carried on a roll call vote, with the
following Councilmembers voting "aye": Clark, Goulet, Lieberman and Scruggs.
Members voting "nay": Eggleston, Martinez and Frate.
23. DEEDS AND EASEMENT ORDINANCE
Ms. Kathie Sholly, Property Manager, presented this item.
This is a request for City Council to accept real estate properties conveyed by
quit-claim deed, warranty deed and/or easements from property owners, pursuant to
Article VII, Sec. 15 of the City Charter.
One of the City Council strategic priorities is managing growth and preserving
neighborhoods. The Deeds and Easement Ordinance conveys properties necessary to
complete municipal objectives.
33
The Deeds and Easement Ordinance is compiled of recently conveyed
properties. These properties have been used for sidewalks, streets, alleyways, parks,
water and sewer lines, and other public utilities. In order to utilize these properties for
similar use in the future, it is necessary that Council adopt an ordinance dedicating
these properties for public use.
It is to the advantage of the City of Glendale to dedicate the described properties
for public use.
Glendale citizens directly benefit from the city's ownership of properties utilized
for public amenities.
The recommendation was to waive reading beyond the title and adopt an
ordinance dedicating certain real property for public use.
Ordinance No. 2346 New Series was read by number and title only, it being AN
ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA, AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GLENDALE, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, ACCEPTING DEEDS AND
EASEMENTS FOR STREET, PUBLIC UTILITY, SIDEWALK, ALLEY, WATER AND
SEWER, PARKS AND OTHER PURPOSES; ORDERING THE DOCUMENTS
RECORDED; AND DEDICATING TO PUBLIC USE THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED
THEREIN
Councilmember Lieberman asked if a surveyor will survey each property
individually. Ms. Sholly explained the property owner will be required to have a
registered land surveyor or civil engineer survey the property to be dedicated.
Vice Mayor Eggleston opened the public hearing on Item 23.
Mr. Leonard Clark, a resident of the City of Glendale Barrel District, asked if the
city is tracking property taxes paid to the County Assessor.
Vice Mayor Eggleston closed the public hearing.
It was moved by Martinez, and seconded by Frate, to approve Ordinance
No. 2346 New Series. Motion carried on a roll call vote, with the following
Councilmembers voting "aye": Clark, Goulet, Lieberman, Eggleston, Martinez,
Frate, and Scruggs. Members voting "nay": none.
REQUEST FOR FUTURE WORKSHOP AND EXECUTIVE SESSION
It was moved by Eggleston, and seconded by Frate, to hold a City Council
Workshop at 1:30 p.m. in Room B-3 of the City Council Chambers on Tuesday,
October 21, 2003, to be followed by an Executive Session pursuant to A.R.S. 38-
431.03. The motion carried unanimously.
34
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Mr. Leonard Clark, a resident of the City of Glendale Barrel District, reported an
increased police presence in his neighborhood. He urged the city to advocate for
funding to address safety issues concerning police cruisers. He thanked the City
Council for its support of veterans and their families. He suggested the city do more to
assist families who have a parent serving overseas. He suggested the city offer its
citizens health related programs, explaining such programs may help residents of the
city obtain lower insurance rates. He stressed the important role churches have played
in the city's history, expressing his opinion the city should do what it can to
accommodate churches.
Mr. Victor Villegas, through his interpreter, Brady Bratcher, explained he
represents two dozen JD Steel workers who have been on strike for the past six
months. He said he first came to Council when JD Steel was mistreating its workers
while building the Coyotes Arena. He stated, thanks to the City Council, Perini Building
Company ordered JD Steel to give its employees a work break. He stated JD Steel is
now working on the Glendale Water Reclamation Plant expansion and their workers
continue to suffer from poor working conditions, do not receive sick pay, are not able to
obtain affordable health insurance and do not feel they can do their jobs safely. He
said he and his fellow striking co-workers want to return to work with dignity and bring
justice to those who continue to work for JD Steel. He stated they have spoken several
times with Sundt Construction and Consolidated Rebar, but need the City Council's
support and involvement in the situation.
Mr. Ron Prothero, a resident of the City of Glendale Ocotillo District, stated he is
appalled by the 59th Avenue and Grand Avenue project. He said the project does little
for Glendale citizens and is hurting business in the downtown area. He referred to a
handout provided by ADOT, stating the loss of 22 businesses and $4 million while the
project is completed is a crime against the city. He spoke about the devastating impact
the project is having on small family owned businesses. He expressed his opinion the
fly-over and underpass options presented by ADOT are better and will cost $4 to $7
million less.
Ms. Robin Berryhill, a resident of the City of Glendale Ocotillo District, recapped
comments she made at the September 23, 2003 Council meeting concerning the
Property Maintenance Codes. She continued, stating there are numerous legal issues,
including Constitutional violations. She asked the city to amend the Property
Maintenance Codes and made the following suggestions: 1) Add a timetable for major
and minor repairs with a minimum of 90 days allowed to establish a plan for major
repairs; 2) Establish a grievance process, separate from court, to resolve neighborhood
issues; 3) Grandfather properties that are not hazardous or in immediate danger with a
provision that the property be brought into compliance upon sale of the property; 4)
Redefine the code enforcement process to be more user friendly; and 5) Make the
identity of the person complaining a matter of public record. She said she hoped the
city would contact her concerning her previous comments, however, to date, they have
35
not. Ms. Berryhill disagreed with Councilmember Goulet's comments concerning alleys
being a means of access rather than for trash storage.
COUNCIL COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS
Councilmember Clark thanked the Police and Fire Departments for the wonderful
Fire Prevention Day Parade. She announced the third of her four district meetings is
scheduled for 6:30 p.m. on Thursday at Discovery Elementary School.
Councilmember Goulet encouraged everyone to turn out for Gang Night.
Councilmember Lieberman encouraged residents to attend the Glendale Civic
Pride Ambassadors' recruiting meeting at Manistee Ranch at 8:00 a.m. this Saturday.
He commented that, on numerous occasions, he has stopped commercial trucks from
dumping garbage on piles set out for loose trash pickup.
Vice Mayor Eggleston announced the next Barrel District meeting will be at
Desert Palm School on October 16.
Councilmember Frate stated a Sahuaro District meeting will be held at Canyon
Elementary School on October 22 at 7:00 p.m. He thanked everyone who attended the
Granada Park dedication. He also thanked those involved in the coordinated effort on
October 10th to catalog all street lights that are out or malfunctioning. He noted the city
intends to have all of the lights repaired before Halloween. He urged residents to watch
children around water.
Councilmember Lieberman noted a Cactus District meeting will be held October
15 at Sine School.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
Pamela Hanna - City Clerk
36