The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packet - Meeting Date: 1/11/2000 (5) rA691,51, City of Glendale, Arizona CC NO: 9 Rib 1999/00 GLENDfE Council Communication DATE: 1-11-00 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Martin Vanacour, City Manager SUBJECT: ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT Z-99-21: MINIMUM PARCEL SIZE FOR SENIOR CITIZEN OVERLAY ZONING SUMMARY This is a request by the McGill Ranch Partnership to amend the SCO (Senior Citizen Overlay) zoning district. The amendment will reduce the minimum parcel size for Senior Citizen Overlay zoning from 20 acres to 10 acres in the multi-family zoning districts (R-2, R-3, R-4, R-5). The current 20-acre minimum parcel size will still be required in the single family residential (RR, SR, R-1) and PAD (Planned Area Development) districts. The current 20-acre minimum was established to ensure that a homeowners association or property management company would have the resources to enforce age restrictions prior to any city enforcement. The objective was also to ensure that subdivisions and apartment complexes were large enough to create the desired senior living environment. Reducing the minimum parcel size for multi-residence developments will allow greater flexibility for seniors only projects and help to accommodate infill development. A minimum parcel size of 10 acres is large enough to ensure economic viability and establish a senior living environment. The Planning Commission recommended approval of Z-99-21 at its hearing on November 18, 1999 by a vote of 4-0. One letter in opposition was submitted prior to the hearing. Two people spoke in opposition at the public hearing. Their primary concern was that the text amendment would encourage apartment development on infill parcels in central and southern Glendale. A letter in opposition was subsequently submitted on December 28, 1999. Subject: PAGE NO: 2 CC NO: 9 DATE: 1-11-00 The SCO district is an overlay that works in conjunction with the underlying zoning district. It does not change the permitted uses, maximum density, or minimum development standards of the underlying district. Apartments can only be developed on sites zoned for apartment use. Apartments developed under SCO zoning cannot be converted to non-senior living unless the SCO overlay is removed from the property through the public hearing process. RECOMMENDATION Conduct a public hearing, approve Z-99-21, and waive reading beyond the title and adopt the Ordinance amending the text of the Zoning Ordinance. Martin Vanacour City Manager .116 -Jok Memorandum P ' DATE: January 11, 2000 TO: Martin Vanacour, City Manager FROM: Larry Harmer, Planning Manager Dan Fairbanks, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT Z-99-21 REQUEST: Amend the text of the Zoning Ordinance to allow SCO (Senior Citizen Overlay) zoning on new multiple residence developments with a minimum size of 10 acres. APPLICANT: McGill Ranch Partnership. DETAILS OF REQUEST: 1. This request will amend Section 6.602 (D)2 of the Zoning Ordinance by specifying a 10- acre minimum parcel size for Senior Citizen Overlay zoning in the Multiple Residence (R-2, R-3, R-4, R-5) zoning districts. The present minimum is 20 acres. 2. The minimum parcel size for Senior Citizen Overlay zoning applications in the RR (Rural Residential), SR (Suburban Residential), R-1 (Urban Residential), and PAD (Planned Area Development) districts will remain at the current 20-acre minimum. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION TO DATE: The applicant sent 355 letters to: persons on the interested parties list for each council district; to persons who spoke at previous hearings regarding Senior Citizen Overlay zoning; to the interested party list for Senior Citizen zoning; and to the residents of Casa Compana and Royal Shadows subdivisions. Ten (10) people contacted the applicant regarding this Zoning Ordinance amendment. The majority support the change or have no concern. Two (2) persons identified that they did not generally support Senior Citizen Overlay zoning. The applicant's Citizen Participation report is attached. Two people spoke in opposition at the Planning Commission public hearing on November 18, 1999. They would like the minimum Senior Citizen Overlay size to remain at 20 acres. One letter in opposition was also received prior to the hearing. A notice of the text amendment was published in the Glendale Star on December 23, 1999. One letter in opposition was received on December 28, 1999. January 11, 2000 Martin Vanacour Z-99-21 Page 2 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The Planning Commission recommended approval of this text amendment by a vote of 4-0 on November 18, 1999. ANALYSIS: • The SCO zoning district currently provides the parameters for age restrictive zoning within Glendale. SCO is an overlay district that works in conjunction with the development standards and density provisions of base zoning districts (i.e. R1-8 or R-3). The overlay requires one resident to be 55 years of age or older in conformance with the Arizona Fair Housing Act, the Federal Fair Housing Act, and the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995. Occupancy of persons less than 18 years of age is restricted to 120 days or less per year. The proposed text amendment does not conflict with the requirements of these Acts. • The current 20-acre minimum was established to ensure that a homeowners association or management agency would have the resources to enforce age restrictions prior to any City enforcement. The objective was also to ensure subdivisions or apartment projects of adequate size to create a seniors only environment. • Maricopa County requires a minimum parcel size of 5 acres for Senior Citizen Zoning. Mesa and Peoria require a 40-acre minimum. None of these jurisdictions distinguish between single family and multi-family development. • The RR (Rural Residential), SR (Suburban Residential), and R-1 (Urban Residential) zoning districts are low density single family districts that allow a density range of 0-8 units an acre. The multiple residence (R-5, R-4, R-3, R-2) zoning districts provide for higher densities, generally within a range of 8-30 units an acre. A 20-acre minimum parcel size is appropriate for Senior Citizen Overlay zoning in the single family residential districts. It appears, however, that 10 acres is sufficient in the Multiple Residence zoning districts to ensure that SCO zoning objectives are met. • Reducing the minimum parcel size for multi-residence developments will allow greater flexibility for seniors only projects and help to accommodate infill development. Recently developed apartment sites in Glendale range in size from 12.8 to 22 acres. A minimum parcel size of 10 acres is large enough to ensure economic viability and establish a senior living environment. STAFF CONCLUSION: The proposed text amendment is not contrary to the objectives of senior citizen overlay zoning and should be approved. January 11, 2000 Martin Vanacour Z-99-21 Page 3 REQUIRED ACTION: The City Council must conduct a public hearing and determine if this request is consistent with the policies and objectives of the General Plan and the intent of the Zoning Ordinance. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proposed Text Amendment. 2. Applicant's Narrative, dated October 17, 1999 (2 sheets). 3. Survey of Senior Citizen Zoning in the Phoenix Metropolitan Area. 4, Citizen Participation Report (25 sheets). 5. Minutes from the July 23, 1996 City Council meeting. 6. Minutes from the October 14, 1999 Planning Commission Workshop meeting. 7. Minutes from the November 18, 1999 Planning Commission meeting. 8. Letter from Barbara Garland, dated November 2, 1999. 9. Letter from Bill Norgren dated December 28, 1999. 10. Planning Commission Action Summary. PROJECT MANAGER: Dan Fairbanks, Senior Planner, (623) 930-2800. REVIEWED BY: Planning Dire or Deputy City Manager ORDINANCE NO. NEW SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, ARIZONA, ARTICLE 6 (ZONING DISTRICTS) BY REVISING THE APPLICATION PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SENIOR CITIZEN OVERLAY DISTRICT; AND SETTING FORTH AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE as follows: SECTION 1. That the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Glendale, Arizona, Article 6 (Zoning Districts), Section 6.600 SCO (Senior Citizen Overlay) is hereby amended to read as follows: Article 6 Zoning Districts Section 6.600 SCO—Senior Citizen Overlay 6.602 Application Procedures and Requirements D. On residential communities which meet the intent of the SCO as outlined in 6.601, the SCO may be established as follows: 1. For existing developments the SCO may be applied only to entire subdivisions, mobile home parks, or multiple residence communities with defined boundaries. No minimum acreage is required. The SCO District precludes exception parcels. 2. For new developments SCO may be established only on parcels of twenty (20) or more contiguous acres IN THE RURAL RESIDENTIAL (RR), SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL (SR), URBAN RESIDENTIAL (R-1) AND PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT (PAD) ZONING DISTRICTS. NEW SCO DEVELOPMENTS IN THE MULTIPLE RESIDENCE (R-5, R-4, R-3, R-2) ZONING DISTRICTS MAY ONLY BE ESTABLISHED ON PARCELS OF TEN (10) OR MORE CONTIGUOUS ACRES and—must. SCO ZONING MAY ONLY be applied Al4Ly to entire subdivisions, mobile home parks, or multiple residence communities with defined boundaries. The SCO District precludes exception parcels. SECTION 2. That the provisions of this ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after adoption and approval by the Mayor and Council. PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED by the Mayor and Council of the City of Glendale, Maricopa County, Arizona, this day of , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: City Clerk (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney REVIEWED BY: City Manager z_99_21.doc McGill Ranch 8815 W. Peoria Ave. Suite 2 Peoria, Arizona 85345 RE.CEA1Fr October 17, 1999 OCT 2 0 1999 Glendale Planning Commission Gieudaie laluu . )L 5850 W Glendale Ave. Glendale, AZ 85301 Gentlepersons: We hereby request a text amendment to Section 6.602 of the City of Glendale Zoning Ordinance (also known as the Senior Citizen Overlay Provision) as it pertains to the minimum acreage requirement for a new development to be built. Specifically we would propose that the minimum acreage requirement be amended from 20 acres to 10 acres for Multiple Residence developments (R-2, R-3, R-4 and R-5) zoning districts. This would leave the minimum acreage at 20 acres for Rural Residential (RR), Suburban Residential (SR), Urban Residential (R-1) and the Planned Area Development (PAD) zoning districts. We currently own a 17.4 acre site in Glendale, which we believe, is eminently suited for development as a senior apartment project serving 55+ active seniors exclusively. We are proposing to build an upscale senior development on this land in order to serve the growing need of the senior community in the west side of the valley. To build this project under the Senior Citizen Overlay provision will insure its status of being permanently restricted to occupancy by seniors. Based on our research Maricopa County and Youngtown have Senior Citizen Overlay zoning at minimum acreage requirements of 5 acres and Mesa has Senior Citizen Overlay zoning with a 40 acre minimum acreage requirement. Phoenix, Litchfield, Goodyear, Avondale, El Mirage, Surprise, Scottsdale, Tempe and Chandler do not have Senior Citizen Overlay zoning. Apartment communities that have submitted plans for review to the City of Glendale have ranged from 7.5 acres to 22 acres. Recent developments that have been approved or are in review are Coral Stone 19.4 acres at 71st Ave and Bell, Glen Arrow 18.4 acres at 63"I and Beardsley, Vintage 7.5 acres at 66th Ave and Cactus, Fairfield 22 acres, Arrowhead Springs 20 acres and Camden Apartments 12.8 acres all in the area of the Arrowhead Mall. My partner Don Short has built 2 senior projects in Escondido, California. Morning View Terrace 326 units on 11.6 acres and Terrace Gardens 225 units on 10.8 acres. In addition he has built in excess of 800 apartment units in various projects. We currently own 2 other projects here in Arizona, which are not senior projects. Desert Gardens 307 units on 11.156 and Walnut Grove 160 units (all single level) on 8.72 acres. Previous to Desert Gardens and Walnut Grove we operated Del Mar Terrace 1012 units on 34.910 acres. We have researched existing senior apartment communities throughout the State as to their site size. The Orchard in Mesa is 696 units on 12.981 acres, Glencroft in Glendale has various facilities and is on 14.731 acres, Sun Wood in Peoria is 220 units on 10.216 acres and Phoenix Manor in Phoenix is 450 units on approx. 25 acres. We believe, after reviewing some of the materials as to when the Senior Citizen Overlay was created,that the primary focus was on detached housing and mobile home parks. The reason for such an acreage requirement was to provide the economic viability of those developments to have managing associations to enforce guidelines. However as seen by the example of the above stated apartment communities for seniors in existence and even apartment projects not for seniors the size allows for the economic base and the obvious management in place to enforce these guidelines. Sincerely, ut) i Cathy /. Oliva General Partner Survey of Senior Citizen Zoning In the Phoenix Metropolitan Area Jurisdiction Senior Citizen Zoning Minimum Acreage Maricopa County Yes 5 Mesa Yes 40 Peoria Yes 40 Buckeye No N/A Chandler No N/A Gilbert No N/A Phoenix No N/A Scottsdale No N/A Surprise No N/A Tempe No N/A Source: City of Glendale Planning Department November, 1999 aq pf? CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN FINAL REPORT Text Amendment To the SCO-Senior Citizen Overlay Prepared By: Cathy Oliva McGill Ranch Partnership 8815 W. Peoria Avenue Suite 2 Peoria, Arizona 85345 Prepared:October 11, 1999 Oct 21 99 10: 34a M 35 Capital Mgmt. ( 23334 -4028 p. 3 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT This participation plan was put together to support our application for a text amendment to the Senior Citizen Overlay ordinance as it pertains to the minimum acreage requirement of new development from a 20 acre minimum to a 10 acre minimum. BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE ELEMENTS OF THE CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN The plan included a project impact section that discussed our reason for wanting to reduce the minimum acreage requirement and that this amendment is not a site specific one and that therefore individual project owners were not notified. Parties notified were those on various interest parties lists. DATES AND SPECIFIC AREAS OF NOTIFICATION A notification letter was mailed out via first class mail on September 27,1999 with a response deadline of October 7, 1999. There were no other mailings or newsletters mailed out as part of this plan. No advertisements or notices in publications were done. This application not being site specific only parties who have had specific interest in the Senior Citizen Overlay Ordinance or parties who are on a general interested party's list were notified. Our request in no way effects existing developments, its residents or its owners. OUTLINED MAP OF SPECIFIC AREAS WHERE RESIDENTS WERE NOTIFIED There was no specific outlined map used. The various parties notified were located throughout the City of Glendale, City of Phoenix and in some cases States other than Arizona. Oct 21 99 10: 34a M is Capital Mgmt. 2 ) 334-4028 p- 4 NAMES OF HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONS, REGISTERED NEIGHBORHOOD GROUPS AND INDIVIDUALS ON "INTERESTED PARTIES LIST THAT WERE NOTIFIED Parties notified were the approximate 30 persons on the interested parties list for each council district, 2 persons on the request for special notice list, the approximate 28 persons who were either present or spoke at previous hearings regarding the Senior Citizen Overlay ordinance, the approximate 270 persons on the interested parties list relating to the Senior Citizen Overlay ordinance including those residents of Casa Compana and Royal Shadows (which are developments with deed restrictions for seniors only), the City of Glendale City Council Office, the City of Glendale Mayor's Office, Dan Fairbanks, Senior Planner and Anna Lopez, Mgmt. Asst.. We chose not to contact any Homeowners Associations or Registered Neighborhood Groups due to the fact that no existing neighborhoods will be effected. This application is not site specific and only effects future development done under the senior citizen overlay ordinance. IDENTIFY DATE AND LOCATIONS OF ALL MEETINGS There were no meetings held. INDIVIDUALS NOTICED AND THOSE WHO ACTUALLY PARTICIPATED 351 persons were notified by mail. 10 responded by phone. 14 were returned "attempted unknown" LIST OF CONCERNS, ISSUES, AND PROBLEMS EXPRESSED BY THE PARTICIPANTS Mr. Thomas Kramer of 19608 N. 73`d Ave. phoned 12:00pm 9/28/99 He sells real estate in the city of Glendale and just wanted an explanation of the letter. After my explanation his comments were "He couldn't care less, doesn't effect him and he thinks it's great" Oct 21 SS 1034a M ,s Capital Mgmt. L2 ) 334 -4028 P- 5 Mrs. Sewell of 17243 N. 66th Dr. phoned 12:55 pm 9/28/99 She lives in Casa Campana and is only interested in what effects them. She wishes us the best of luck. Ed and Katherine Beard of 17413 N. 66th Ln. phoned 2:55pm 9/28/99 Wanted to know what the letter was about. He didn't have any specific questions. He felt that apartments for seniors would be a good move. Carol Henry of 16272 N. 66th Ln. phoned 12:15pm 9/29/99 Lives in Casa Campana and just wanted to know if it effected them in any way. Ms. Barbara Garland of 5012 N. 64th Dr. phoned 2:15pm 9/30/99 Her lm reaction is yes she would have some concerns, but nothing specific at this time. She will follow any other notices or meetings concerning this issue. Mr. Bill Norgren of 8608 W. Cavelier phoned 3:45 pm 10/1/99 Mr. Norgren is co-chairman of the West Glendale Community Coalition. He wanted to know why we were interested in targeting seniors and I explained how we feel about the needs for seniors in Glendale. He was curious as to why developers wouldn't seek individual variances for their proposed projects. He said he would put our letter out on the intemet and others he was associated with. Ms. Jennette Sechrist of 9208 N. 65th Ave. phoned 10:20am 10/4/99 She lives in the Royal Shadows senior mobil home subdivision. She just wanted to know if it pertained to a specific site. I explained this is not a site- specific application. Oct 21 99 10: 34a M 35 Capital Mgmt . ( 2 ) 334-4028 P• 6 Ms. Angie Steckley of 17231 N. 66th Ave. phoned 10:40am 10/4/99 She wanted to know what the letter meant. Her only concern is that she doesn't want another Sun City because she doesn't want support cut off for schools (taxes). Ms. Maryann Smith of 17249 N. 66th Dr. phoned 12:05pm 10/4/99 She lives at Casa Campana. She says they tried to get Casa Campana under the SCO ordinance and were unsuccessful. She does support senior projects. She is a real estate agent in Glendale. Mr. Jack Wineblood of 6507 W. Eva St. phoned 12:19pm 10/7/99 He resides in Royal Shadows. He just wanted to know what the letter means. He says doesn't effect him. HOW CONCERNS,ISSUES, AND PROBLEMS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED It was explained to each person who made contact what specifically we were asking for in the application. Each person was also told that there would be a public meeting of which they would be notified. They were also told that if they had any other questions and or concerns even following the October 7, 1999 deadline that they could feel free to call me. CONCERNS, ISSUES, AND PROBLEMS THEY ARE UNWILLING TO ADDRESS AND WHY There are no issues that the participants claimed to feel unable to discuss. And there are no issues we as applicants have or will be unable or unwilling to discuss. HOW PROPOSALS HAVE BEEN REVISED TO ADDRESS PUBLIC CONCERNS Based on comments received at the Planning Commission Workshop we have revised our request to change only the minimum required acreage for new developments with R-2, R-3, R-4 and R-5 zoning to a 10 acre minimum Oct 21 SS 10: 35a M 35 Capital Munt . 2 ) 334-4028 p. 7 verses a 20 acre minimum. This is more appropriate to accommodate multiple residential developments. We are in the process of notifying the 10 respondents of our modified application by mail and by phone for those we have phone numbers for. COPIES OF LETTERS, MEETING NOTICES, NEWSLETTERS, PUBLICATIONS, ETC. RECEIVED IN SUPPORT OR AGAINST There have been no letters, notices, newsletters, publications, sign-in sheets, or petitions received for or against application. I am attaching a copy of the entire returned letter and a complete copy of the mailing lists used and a copy of returned letters. See appendix. APPENDIX Larry & Agnes Abbott George & Evelyn Lods Mr. Clyde Evans or cuLLent resident or current resident 17220 N. 66 LN 17226 N 66 IN or current resident 6542 W. Eva Glendale Az 85308 Glendale. AZ 85308 Glendale AZ • 85302 Richard & Katheryn Denton Mr. Bill Ziemer or current resident Rosalind M. Ernewein Grand Missouri Mobile Home Pk 17244 N 66 LN or current resident 4400 W. Missouri Av #75 Glendale Az 85308 6616 W. Eva Avenue Glendale,. AZ 85301 Glendale AZ 85302 Ted & Lucille Aranowski • Nilda M. Ryan or current resident Melvin Hultmann or current resident 17225 N. 66th Avenue or current resident 17031 N 66th LN Glendale AZ 85308 6532 W. Mission Lane Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85302 Gertrude McCormack Donald & Theora Baraore Gladys Stottsberry or current resident or current resident or current resident 6511 West Eva Street 6611 West Hatcher 17220 N 66th Drive Glendale AZ 85302. Glendale AZ 85302 Glendale AZ 85308 Sandy McGregor Bill Ziemer Tom Kramer or current resident or current resident or current resident 17225 N 66th LN 4400 W Missouri #75 11225 N. 28th Drive B-106 Glendale Az 85308 Glendale AZ 85301 Phoenix, AZ 85029 John & Valetta Foster Mary Ann Smith Charles S. Bryan or current resident or current resident or current resident 17215 N 66th Drive 17249 N 66th Drive 8024 Linda Vista Rd A-1 Glendale: Az 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 San Diego CA 92111 Ms Kathy Krushinsky Leonard & Evelyn Sword Roland & Mildred Mattison or current resident or current resident or current resident 17631 N 75th Avenue 9402 N 65th Drive 9110 N 65th DR Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85302 Glendale AZ 35302 Sheridan & Marlys Campbell Willard & Ruth Mattingly or current resident or current resident 2914 N 17th Avenue 9116 N 65th Drive Phoenix AZ 85015 Glendale AZ 85302 Ms Karen K Binns Mr. Kenneth Standridgg. or current resident or current resident 17232 N 66 LN P.O. Box 384 C endale AZ 85308 Clinton OH 64735 — _ -.....,• • JEFFREY&MARGUERITE CLARK MS JEANETTE E UTTER OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 9434 N 65 DR 6532 W CAROL AVE GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 • MS RRA KLEMENCIC 8 MS SHARON HUGHES MERLE& EDITH MORGAN FREDERICK 8 ELEANOR HULBERT RfTA T RESIDENT Of CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR502 W RENT AVE 66 _W SUNNYSLOPE LN 6618 W SUNNYSLOPE LN GLENDALE AZ 8VE?2 GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 85532 SALLY LOU BARKLEY • SAMUEL d WANDA MAGAR ET J ZIMMERMAN FAMILY TR ROBERTS CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR OR UJ CAROL AVE 6541 W SUNNYSLOPE LN 6602 W SUNNYSLOPE LN GLENDALE OZ 8E02 GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 MS VIOLA L KOCHENASH ERWIN d KiM MEINK BILLY&HILDA NIX OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 6538 W CAROL AVE 6621 W HATCHER RD 6617 W HATCHER RD GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 JACK&GLADYS FINCH RAYMOND d JOANNE LEMONDS MS JOYCE E REEC'. OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT, OR CURRENT RESIDENT • 6.542 W CAROL AVE 6539 W CAROL AVE- . • 6533W CAROL AVE • GLENDALE AZ 853.72 GL&DALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 85372 ERNEST&IRENE RUES MS LAVERNE CHRISTENSEN ERNEST.&FRANCES FRANKS OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 6528 W CAROL AVE MS BLANCHE CHRISTENSEN 6601 W CAROL AVE GLENDALE AZ 85302 0609 W CAROL AVE GLENDALE AZ 65302 • GLENDALE AZ 85302 DONALD I EILEEN DICKEY ROBERT I GERTRUDE STURM MS MARY E JUDO OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT :6534 W SUNNYSLOPE LN 9.414 N 65 0R 9408 N 65 DR L GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 85342 GLENDALE AZ 85302 r.•.A ROBERT&DOLORES SCHOOLEY GENE TYREE&NANCY ENGELSMAN BILLY&LORETTA BADGER OR CUP.P.EN T RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT — • - ' " OR CURRENT RESIDENT ' 6508 W CAROL AVE 16522 W CAROL AVE 6514 W CAROL AVE GLENDALE AZ 65302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 65302 s ROBERT&BONNIE BARTLETT MR THOMAS G CAMPBELL :SAM& PEARL KING OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT •OR CURRENT RESIDENT 6.123 N 65 C5424 N 65 OR ;CFAB W SUNNYSLOPE LN GLENDALE •.Z 85302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 .GLENDALE AZ 85302 AMELIA MEELAN MR DONALD E OrT ER9ECK WARREN&DOROTHY HELTON OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 9.4181.4 65 DR 6513 W CAROL AVE 6615 W CAROL AVE GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 Arthur & Jean Bartlett Leo & Anne OBrien Alma Lou Shai. or current resident or current resident or current resident 17232 N 66 DR 17226 N 66 DR 15050 N 30 DR Glendale AZ 85308 GlerAdale AZ 85308 Phoenix AZ 85023 Herbert & Ruth. Champney June Truitt Smith or current resident Herbert & Armida Alford or current resident 17214 N 66 DR or current resident 17032 N 66 DR Glendale AZ 85308 17202 N 66 DR Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Richard & Lucille CornetetLester & Margaret Isham Helen & Stephanie Kana or current resident or current resident or current resident 17026 N 66 DR 17022 N 66 DR 17018 N 66 DR Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Ms Florence M ONeil Kenneth & Juanita 1-tetchier Ms Hazel E Kallongree or current resident Edward & Janet Palmer 6652 W Camino San Xavier 6658 W Camino San Xavier or current resident Glendale AZ 85308 ,Glendale AZ 85308 6664 W Camino San Xavier Glendale AZ 85308 Paul & Helen Dobash Berry & Mary Eck Charles & Audrey Jefferson or current resident or current resident or current resident 6670 W Camino San Xavier 6674 W Camino San Xavier 17032 N 66 LN Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Guy & Virginia Howard Charles & Jeanette Pursley David & Sharin Purs1Ly or current resident or current resident or current resident 17025 N 66 LN 17026 N 66 i 17021 N 66 LN Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 ' Glendale Az 85308 Ward H Ryan Raymond & Maxine Sankey Resident or current resident or current resident 17207 N 66 LN 17031 N 66 LN 17201 N 66 LN Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 MS Loui. Lynn Binns Mr. Albert G. Rusch Ms Olga Gale McGregor or current resident or current resident or current resident 17213 N 66 LN HCR Box 180-7 17225 N 66 LN Glendale AZ 85308 Payson, AZ 85541 Glendale AZ 85308 Charles & Ruth Otto Wayne & Patricia Wallace Kenneth & Barbara Munn or current resident or current resident or cl..rrent resident 17235 N 66 LN 17245 N 6 U4 17249 N 66 LN Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Javos & Christine bright S & W Cloud Co Inc Chalmer & Nary Shuf.f or current resident or current resident or current resident 17202 N 66 LN 2240 W Shangri La 17214 66.LN 85308 Glendale AZ Glendale AZ 85308 phoenix AZ 85029 s Christeen Hyde Money Saver Insurance Corp Mr & Mrs Robison current resident or current resident or current resident 17258 N 66 Dr PO Box 280 8401-N 67 Ave. ;dendale AZ 85302 Peoria AZ 85345 Glendale AZ 85301 3enjamin & Beverly Mullins Von & Leah Darnell Edmund & Katherine Beard current resident or current resident or current resident 7020 W 35th Ave 17419 N 66 LN 17413 N 66 LN ?hoenix AZ 85017 Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 S:aymond & Mary Rosenau Dale & Betty Shelley Joyce Richard Living Trust Dr current resident or current resident or current resident 17250 N 66 LN 17262 N 66 LN 17418 N 66 LN Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 3urrett & June Cl-ay Mahlon & Elberta White Richard & Rachel Randall Dr current resident or current resident or current resident 17442 N 66 LN 17466 N 66 LN 17403 N 66 Ave 31endale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 .• ''s Joyce D Fritschle Jan-es Einwand Casa Cairipana Homeowners Assoc Dr current resident or current resident or current resident 2910 W Citrus Way 17427 N 66 Ave • 17201 N 66 Dr 7hoenix AZ 85017 Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 • Donna M Keko Janes & Mary Ann Smith Mr James Donegan Dr current resident or current resident or current resident 17242 N 66 Dr 4809 Country Oaks Blvd 17029 N 66 Ave 31endale AZ 85305 Sarasota Fl 34243 ' Glendale AZ 85308 • Doris L Morey Mr Donald E Danner Thomas & Mary Roye r current resident or current resident or current resident 17201 N 66 Ave 17209 N 66 Ave 17215 N 66 Ave 7dendale Az 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Louis Stern Mr Wilfred M Bachaeier Ms Dorothy M Wilson pr current resident or current resident or current resident 17255 N 66 Dr 17238 N 66 Dr 17238 N 66 LN 31endale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Glerdale AZ 85308 3rent & Cel-ole Bortz MD & Florence McClellan Joseph & Betty Martin Dr current resident or current resident or current resident 17270 N 66 LN 17449 N 66 LN 17401 N 66 LN Idendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 • ..1ton & Akl:,....e Ayles Ronald & Georgiana Sttine Ms Leona Yeary . -_,r current resident or current resident or current resident =‘,673 W Camino San Xavier 2801 N 8 St 6663 W Camino San Xavier dendale Az 85308 Avondale AZ 85323 . Glendale AZ 85308 • . Harold & Roxie Buckner Ms Frances H Montanye Clarence & Marion Tipton or current resident or current resident or current resident 6663 W Camino San Xavier 6663 W Camino San Xavier 4208 W Hatcher Glend, le AZ 85308 Glehdale AZ 85308 Phoenix AZ 85021 Edward & Helen Hopkiewicz Lee & Katie Parker Arthur & Mary Kleabir or current resident or current resident or current resident 6637 W Camino San Xavier 6633 W Camino San Xavier 6629 W Camino San Xavier Glendale AZ .85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Ms Agnes E Boling Ms Ella Mae Conley ' Glenn & Ardith Millar or current resident or current resident or current resident 6623 W Camino San Xa•.-ier 6619 W Camino San Xavier 6613' W Camino San Xavier GlendLLe AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 • • Kalman & Rose Takacs Ms Ida M Hyde Leo Rubasch Trustee or current resident or current resident or current resident 6607 W. Camino San Xavier 17001 N 66 Ave 17007 N 66 Ave Glendale AZ F5308 Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 .. Ms Mary E Domzella Harry & Ellen Forney Gerald & Evelyn Yerby or current resident or current resident or current resident 17013 N 66 Ave 17019 N 66 Ave - 17023 N 66 Ave Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 . . Joseph & Helen Hicks Robert & Anne Scott Hamilton Family Trust or current resident or current resident or current resident 17039 N 66 Ave 17043 N 66 Ave 6607 W Camino De La Campana Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Arthur A Ninke Ms Beverly Lawrence John & Ann Walsh or current resident or current resident or current resident 929 W Sprague Ave 20431 N 21 Ave 17201 N 66 Terr Spokane WA 99204 Phoenix AZ 85027 Glendale AZ 85308 Ms Elisabeth Denton - Charles & Dorothy Lawyer Marvin & Donna Robinson or current resident or current resident or current resident 17211 N 66 Terr 17225 N 66 Terr 17202 N 66 Ave Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 George & Lilly Streeper Ms Lucille V Vineyard Ms Angeline Steckley or current resident or current resident or current resident 17219 N 66 Ave 17225 N 66 Ave ' ' 17231 N 66 Ave Glendale A. 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 &.endale AZ 85308 Grover & He en Bray George & Viola Michel James & Shirley Warren or current resident or current resident cr current resident 17237 N 66 Ave 17328 N 66 Ter: 17232 N 66 Terr Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale Az 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Janes A Steen Jr Ms Gladys R Johnson Hugh & Georgia Knox or current resident or current resident or current resident 17226 N 66 Terr 17220 N 66 Terr 17214 N 66 Terr Glendale AZ 85308 Glehdale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ '85308 Mr Nicholas Galan Donald & Jo Ann Wullenwaber Anthony & Sophie Ozlanksi or current resident or current resident or current resident 17202 N 66 Terr 17048 N 66 Terr 17208 N 66 Terr Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ . 85308 Rodney & Mildred Newton .Charlie & Bertha Reed Anthony & Hilda Lombardi or current resident c current resident or current resident 17026 N 66 Terr 2 . 020 N 66 Terr #48 17016 N 66 Terr Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Della Marie Finley Brown Firnily Trust Lynn Cady & Rachel Tedesco or current resident or current resident or current resident 17012 N 66 Terr 17011 N 66 Terr 17017 N 66 Terr Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Julis & Esther Stroebel Buddy & Lasca Beck - Ms Marguerite Gibbs or current resident or current resident or current resident Route 1 Box 146 17027 N 66 Terr 17031 N 66 Terr Danvers MN 56231 Glendale. AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Ms Cecilia Angelino Albert & Effie Eckerdt Resident or current resident or cum-rent resident 17022 N 66 Ave 17032 N 66th Ave. 17028 N 66 Ave Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Ms Geraldine M Stevens 1r John J Most Frank & Viola Beede or current resident or .Current resident or current resident 17018 N 66 Ave 17012 N 66 AVe-7 17011 N 66 DR Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Jrmes & Jula Keener Mr Tyson A Ballard Emma Herlocker & June Smith ; or current resident or current resident or current resident 17015 N 66 17025 N 66 DR 17207 N 66 DR Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Volkman Family Trust Delbert & Cathryne Sabel Jed & Donna Wilson or current resident or current resident or current resident 1727 N 66 DR 17231 N 66 Dr 17237 N 66 Dr" Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Charles & Mary Sev.211 MI. Nayne K Roll Corelie F Cobba or current resident or current resident or current resident 17243 N 66 DR 27261 N 66 DR 17267 N 66 DR Glendale Az 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 Glendale AZ 85308 . . • WILLIAM 8 RUTH COOL ' RICHARD 8 EILEEN OCONNER MR RAY Still-ER . OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 6539 W SUNNY8-LOPE LN 9102 N 66 DR 6672 W HATCHER GLENDALE Ae.5302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 Z. . . ,av KENNETH a ANNA OGLE fPHILLIP& BEATRICE DODSON MS IU: E E RAHLF OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CU ,RENT RESIDENT 6509W SUNNYSLOPE IN •6501 W EVA ‘6302 W MISSION IN .1.1GLENOALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 V.:. - • BERT d PHYLLIS COLLINS RAYMOND&OLIVE BATES CLIFFORD&NAOMI PIGGEE OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 9120 N 66 DR C.:43 W HATCHER RD 211 N 66 DR GLENDALE AZ 65302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 • . .... "ALARIC&NUBYE FRASER-LANE RALPH& IRENE-TINKER% OR CURRENT RESIDENT MS RUTH VAN WYCK OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 6541 W EV; 6621 v,/SUNNYSLOPE LN 8541 W MISSION LN GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 *.l • • • . .. • ,MR DENNIS I.SHAW GLEN&LOIS HEFFRON .r.'-', DONALD&THORA BARMORE 'OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT '16521 W EVA 8615 W MISSION IN 6611 W HATCHER RD GLENDALE AZ 15302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 • GLENDALE AZ 85302 • MS BETTY JOY RICKETTS 'EDWARD&LC.:S HOWERING - OR CURRENT RESIDE:CT •OR CURRENT RESIDENT ROBERT&FRANCES ZIMMERMAN 6543W HATCHER RD '6610 W EVA .. OR CURRENT RESIDENT GLENDALE AZ 85302 •GLENDALE AZ 85302 2120 N65 DR GLENDALE AZ 85302 GEORGE&NORMA SIMON MR WILLIAM R GRABOWSKI HAROLD&HARRIET HUGHES OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 6511 W EVA 6638 E SUNNYSLOPE LN airr W SUNNYSLOPE LN GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ GLENDALE AZ 65302 85302 • • • . _ .11MhAIE&OPAL HEETER . OR CURRENT RESIDENT ,WILLIAM&LEONE CONNER MR JOE ATKINS • 6638 W HATC/iER RD OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT n —4519 W BRYCE GLENDALE AZ 65302 V208 N 65 DR GLENDALE AZ 85302 _, GLENDALE AZ 85301.. ... . . HUGH.11 EVELYN MCELENY MS ROSA T HELLER MARK&MARGARET STUTESMAN ' CR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT Cz' CURRENT RESIDENT , • 6.525 W SUNNYSLOPE IN 6524\:'EVA S 1 28 6617 W MISSION LN : GLENDALE AZ 8-5302 GLEI ALE AZ 65302 GLENDALE AZ 65302 I' • ':'• i'• MS DOROTHY L SALLEY MR ROBERT MEYA • MS HELEN M COLEGROVE OR CURRENT RESIDENT 653.4W EVA OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 9-4V N 65 DR 5740 W HEARN GLENDALE AZ 85302 . GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 85306 • MR DELBERT R RUNYAN JESSE f.LOUISE GERKEY MS ANNIE COURY OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 6518 W CAROL AVE 9426 N 66 DR 5022W MESCAL GLENDALE AZ 85301 GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE-AZ 85304 • • • MS JOYCE PETERS MR DANIEL F STANZEL CHARLES 8 LIILDRED HERNDON OR JOY REPE RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 9408 N 65 DR 6515WSUNNYSLOPELN 5747 W :i:SSOURI 1159 GLENDALE AZ 35302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 85301 MS KATHY KRUSHINSKY MS JERALDINE F BROCK LONNIE R ROBINSON OR C JRRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT • ' OR CURRENT RESIDENT 17531 N 75 AVE 6618W CAROL AVE 6646 NW GRAND AVE GLENDALE AZ 85308 GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 85301 HERMAN 8 BERNADINE SELL RUBY L RONALD RIEMAR WENDELIN E BEVERLY SCHWARTZ OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 6808 W CAROL AVE 9402 N 68 OR 6602W HATCHER RD GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 65302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 ROBERT d HARRIETT EDMONDS MS IRENE M LINDOUIST DWIGHT&LORRAINE RANSDELL OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 6522 W CAROL AVE 6626 W CAROL AVE 6601 W HATCHER RD GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 MS ELEANOR L INGERSOLL MS ESTHER M NORMAN GARY&LULU COOK OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 9436 N 66 DR 9414 N 68 DR 6611 W SUNNYSLOPE LN • GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 LEO&BETTY DOUGLASS ADOLPH&EMMA SCHMIERBACH OR CURRENT RESIDENT : OR CURRENT RESIDENT LUELLA NOLISCE&KAROL MCCABE 9418 N 66 OR OR CURRENT RESIDENT GLENDALE AZ 85301 • 9432 N 66 OR 6618 W HATCHER RD GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 MAURICE THOMPSON MR CARL W MCDOWELL MS MARY GUERTIN d MR WILDS RENTER OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 9207 N 65 DR i°O1 W MARLBORO OR 6543 W SUNNYSLOPE LN GLENDALE AZ 85302 CHANDLER AZ 85224 GLENDALE AZ 85302 MS MARY B MALVERSON JORGE 6 ALMA SCHUL'`Z MR JCHN L LAW.S III OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CUP'":ENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 5502 W CAROL AVE 6819 W CAROL AVE 9212 N 65 AVE GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 • MS PAULINE L ESKOLA MS FAITH HUTCHINGS ' DONALD&ANNABELLE HOOVER OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 95-2N66DR 9122N65AVE - 9112N65AVE GLENDALE AZ 65302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 LARD d RUTH MATTINGLY MS RUTH ENICKS WIL OR CURRENT RESIDENT DONALD S. NELDA MAXWELL OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURT.;ENT RESIDENT 652•9 W SUNNYSLOPE LN SI1L N 65 DR 6601 W MISSION LN GLENDALE AZ 65302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 8S302 I ' • DOYLE S.VERNA PEARCE FRANK S.BETTE SCHARNOTT MS LILLIAN M LINSLEY OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 316 WALNUT PLAIN RD 6535W MISSION LN .526W MISSION LN ROCHESTER MA 02770 GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 65302 CHARLES S.DOROTHY PULISPHER EER HARD S.RACHEL MANN WAYNE&MARC- •=.ET KELLEY OR CURRENT RESIDENT — OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RLSIDENT • • 6539 W HATCHR RD 6625W MISSION LN 6542 W MISSION IN GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 65302 GLENDALE AZ 65302 THE CARLSON RESIDENCE GORDON S.VIRGINIA SWARTZ MR PATRICK J MAJOR OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 9218N&SAVE 6513W MISSION LH 9101 N 65DR GLENDALE AZ 65302 GLENDALE AZ 65302 GLENDALE AZ 852‘..12 • MR HOWARD M WAGEMAN MS CAROLYN LEE CLEMMER ROLAND&MIDRED MATTISON OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 6512W HATCHER R'.-• 9231 N 66 DR 9110 H 65 DRI115 GLENDALE AZ 8530:. GLENDALE AZ 85372 GLENDALE AZ 85302 W.E;BERTHA J LIGGETT DAN S.ANNAELLE BARR JAMES&MARTHA DAVIS OR CURRENT RESIC ENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 651.4 W HATCHER RD 6536 W MISSION LH 4209 N 65 DR GLENDALE AZ asyn GLENDALE AZ 65302 GLENDALE AZ 65302 LOUIS S.GOLDIE PIER ER JAMES S.RUTH MOORE MR CLEO C VI:LARDE OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 6522 W MISSION LN 6531 W MISSION LN 6501 W SUNNYSLOPE LN GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ LS302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 MS MARY LOU MCALLISTER MR S.MRS SCOBEY MS LORRAINE SCHOELLHAMMER OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURREN f RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 9102 N 65 AVE 9121 N 65 OR 6S35 W SUNNYSLOPE IN GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 KOLAS&KATHARINA KEIPERT ROBERT S.DORS TURCOTT VICTOR S.BEVERLY NORCROSS CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT - OR CURRENT RE SIC F NT E419 W SUNNYSLOPE LN 9117 N 6S-t7R - 6621W MISSION LN GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 65302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 • • FERNE I JORDAN MS ELCZABETH A GUSTAFSON ROSENA R BEARDEN • OR CURRENT RESIDENT CR CURRENT RESIDENT OR cur RENT RESIDENT 6.507 W HATCHER RD 6812 W MISSION LN 17252 N 15 OR GLENDALE AZ 65302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 65302 ROYAL SHADOWS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC KARL 8 EILEEN ODENOAHL Joseph & Inez Maes OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT Or current resident 6`10 W SUNNYSLOPE LNG 6507 W EVA 6617 W Sunnyslope LN GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 y 1 Glendale AZ 85302 • • Kenneth & Lois Cross MS HELEN L ALSVIG or current resident BRUCE&THELMA VARNER OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 92fl N 66 DR 9107 N 65 DR 91:4 N 66 DR GLENDALE AZ 85302 Glendale AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 AZ CONF CORP 7 DAY ADVENTISTS BEATRICE&MARY MAJOcur reMs urrB Sechris t OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT or current resident 8531 w EVA 653%W EVA 9208 N. 65th Ave GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 Glendale AZ 85302 Melvin & Mae Ho l tmarnz ROBERT.3 BETTY MCKINNEY ARTHUR 8 ALICE LESLIE or current resident OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 6617 W EVA 6603 EVA 6532 W Mission LN GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 Glendale AZ 85302 • -S D E HELEN HODGES ROBERT&ADELINE YORK Lon & Marie Fisk OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT or current resident e5=.0 N SNOWFLAKE 9233N 65 DR 9201 N 65 DR FLAGSTAFF AZ 85001 GLENDALE AZ 85372 • Glendale AZ 85302 Ms Gladys P Jacobs CHESTER&GERTRUDE MCCORMACK RICHARD&VIRGINIA ROBISON or current resident OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 6511 YJ EVA 6525W EVA 6622 W SL nyslope LN GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 Glendale AZ 85302 CHARLES 8 JOHANNA GABRELSI3 ARTHUR&MARY ROY Mr Jack Kellar OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT or current resident 5218 N 66 DR 6535 W EVA 12003 N 60 Ave GLENDALE AZ 85302 GLENDALE AZ 85302 • Glendale AZ 85304 Wendell & Phyllis Schuck RUSSELL&HAZEL ROBINSON RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 6616 W'EVA or current resident 914+N 66 DRGLENDALE AZ 85302 6608 W Mission LN GLENDALE AZ 85302 Glendale AZ 85302 RALPH S DORIS PERDUE Melvin & Mae Holtmann Ms Ellie F Crook OR C.'RRENT RESIDENT or current resident or current resident 6501 •'l EVA 9207 N 65 DR 6612 W Carol Ave GLENDALE A7 85702 Glendale AZ 85302 Glendale AZ 85302 Paul & Jean Seaver Donald & Frances Haworth or current resident GEORGE 8 NORMA SIMON • or current resident Leroy F Stevens OR CJRRENT RESIDENT 607 W EVA 9114 N 66 DR 9108 N 65 Ave GLENDALE AZ 85302 Glendale AZ 85302 Glendale AZ 85302 B. GARLAND MS MARY ANN SMITH MR RICHARD CUR 5012 NORTH 64TH DRIVE 17249 N 66TH DR 17026 N 66TH DR GLENDALE AZ 85301 GLENDALE AZ 85301 GLENDALE AZ 85301 SKIP HANCOCK * MR ROBERT JOHN YORK JOHN & VALETTA FOSTER 5108 N 40TH ST. , SUITE 3 9202 N 66TH DR 17215 N 66TH DR PHOENIX AZ 85018 GLENDALE AZ 85301 GLENDALE AZ 85301 . . GIORA BEN-HORIN MS ROSALIND ERNEWEIN MS LILY STREEPER 5050 N. 40TH ST. #320 6616 WEST EVA ST 17219 N 66TH AVE PHOENIX AZ 85018 GLENDALE AZ 85301 GLENDALE AZ 85301 , . GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL OFFC MR CLYDE EVANS MS HARRIET SPAULDING 5850 W GLENDALE AVE 6542 WEST EVA ST 17023 N 66TH AVE GLENDALE AZ 85301 GLENDALE AZ 85301 ' GLENDALE AZ 85301 ANNA LOPEZ, IT ASSISTANT MR TOM CRAMER MR GEORGE STREEPER 5850 W GLENDALE AVE 19608 N 73RD AVE 17219 N 66TH AVE GLENDALE AZ 85301 GLENDALE AZ 85301 GLENDALE AZ 85301 . . CITY OF GLENDALE MAYOR'S MS KIMBERLY OMNES MS ROXIE BUCKNER OFFICE 17476 N 64TH DR 6663 W CAMINO SAN XAVIER 5850 W GLENDALE AVE GLENDALE AZ 85301 " GLENDALE AZ 85301 GLENDALE AZ 85301 DAN FAIRBANKS, SENIOR MR RICHARD DENTON ISAAC & BEATRICE MACKEY PLANNER 17244 N 66TH LN 6651 W CAMINO SAN XAVIER 5850 W GLENDALE AVE GLENDALE AZ 85301 ' GLENDALE AZ 85301 GLENDALE AZ 85301 - . . MR CHARLES M OTTO MS JUANITA HETCHLER. MS NELDA RYAN 17235 N 66TH LN 6658 WEST CAMINO SAN XAVIER 17031 N 66TH LN GLENDALE AZ 85301 GLENDALE AZ 85301 GLENDALE AZ 85301 MS GLADYS ETOTTSBERRY . MR. KENNETH HETCHLER MS LOUISE FRASER-LANE 17220 N 66TH DR 6658 WEST CAMINO SAN XAVIER 6541 W EVA ST. GLENDALE AZ 85301 GLENDALE AZ 85301 . GLENDALE AZ 85301 MS RUTH E OTTO MR RAYMOND ROSEMAN THOMAS & GRACE MIL1AR 17235 N 66TH Ln 17250 N 66TH LN 6613W CAMINO SAN XAVIER GLEN6ALE AZ 85301 GLENDALE AZ 85301 GLENDALE' AZ 85301 • NAu. BORUM JERRY HOWF DIANE HAND 5956 W MORNING DOVE DRIVE 6401 W IRMA LANE 5349 W ACAPULCO aINTALE AZ 85308 GLEpIALE AZ 85308 GLENDALE AZ 85306 PAUL DOLAN CHUCK HANSEN JEFF BUTCHER 7265 W. DONALD DRIVE 5321 W MONONA DRIVE 5766 W CORRINE DR GLENDALE AZ 85310 GLENDALE AZ 85308 GLENDALE AZ 85304 JUDY FARR CANDACE COTTON SUSAN TOSH 6527 W. HILL LANE 6403 W ROBIN LANE 7422 N 79TH LANE GLENDALE AZ 85310 GLENDALE AZ 85310-5721 GLENDALE AZ 85303 • WILLIAM RAY MS PAT MERRITT BILL NORGREN 7305 W ANGELA DRIVE 5804 W DEL LAGO 8608 WEST CAVALIER GLENDALE AZ 85308 GLENDALE AZ 85308 GLENDALE AZ 85305 • BUFFY PETERSON MARIBETH TATUM GARY ROLF 6373 W FIREBIRD DRIVE 7422 WEST MARYLAND AV 5212 N 69TH AVENUE GLENDALE E AZ 85308 GLENDALE E. AZ 85303 GLENDALE AZ 85303 DAVE TRISH GARY ROLF RICHARD SCH ART'Z 6773 W VIA MCt TOYA DR 5212 N 69TH AVE 8232 W MONTEBELLO AVE GLENDALE AZ 85310 GLENDALE E AZ 85303 GLENDALE AZ 85303 WENDFI?, JONES KAREN ABORNE KAREN ABORNE 6152 W BLACKHAWK DR 7318 W GRIFFIN AVENUE 7318 W GRIir1N AVENUE GLENDALE AZ 85308 GLENDALE AZ 85303 GLENDALE AZ 85303 ION TATE CHRIS HAYES MS SANDY MCGREGOR 6735 W ROBIN LANE 5355 W ACAPULCO 17225 N 66TH LN GLENDALE AZ 85310 GLENDALE AZ 85306 GLENDALE AZ 85301 SHAWN LAUX BUD WENKE BONNIE STEIGER CONSTITUENT LIAISON 5882 W DEL LAGO CIRCLE 5325 W ACAPULCO 1700 W WASHINGTON, SENATE WING GLENDALE AZ 85308 GLENDALE AZ 85306 PHOENIX AZ 85017 JANETTE RAY JILES TJS W 6556 W MELINDA LANE 1631 W FREES DR 6024 TNA83RD AVE GLENDALE E AZ 85308 PHOENIX AZ 85023 GLENDALE AZ 85303 . . ---- -, ARCM Ranch Partnership , -----.s--- Business Office p t ..' ..'. , ••...r. •. - 8815 W.Peoria Ave.,Suite 2 Peoria,AZ 85345 i b ID•i-z4 I I t 1 Iva • ' ' ' ' 0,4 47-racjralg.„„,,AbasEss ..,...,,,,,.... ,•3_,,./ p -'''4•A•li actithi'w - -• .' 7°S0off??EZT --'44': .';':."•' - .. • ,---... Vnci74i8ER """'"••••••;.::.•::77 - . 4DoRas Money Saver Insurance.Corp/ or current resident:-. ---- PO Box 280 Peoria AZ 85345 .,r, _.... .:--.7' -.,- !.... ...4.-,,„...-.... -• , . -• '...-- ...o..--,....kJ I ,.", -..*.-—itii;;•.:-:,,;.,,!:,,77,:z.,.•:- ....:::It•,:‘,..::.;-";....3.•:---''.:--'rn'...t=••i'....."-..--t-.. ......... -C.'-t----' ''''--11"-3 7 4P 6. ............-----__.----- McGill Ranch Farmers/tip : ip • 4..• a.f —'---------TAii Business Office FM 0 z 8815 W.Peoria Ave.,Suite 2 0_ in , - Peoria,AZ 85345 - -. .1 Arb.',1-:;OTREET , issS ---------------- - ..!.7t ...„. -- ,--- --- - . -•:--,.,•,-4 ii!;,1- 7.w.:41:,)41P47.-4?-1/vumfien Uri, r•-:'••,?-V,T.'FOS'"::4'2:' r ;:.,, ''': Mr. Kenneth S-- Lr.iridse or current resident P.O. Box 384 Clinton OH 64735 ......, ei.,:i .. • r.....•:-,:•• -.:.., r...•.=.7.,.f. Liiiiiimiliriniiiiiiirlinluillinfillinimililinill McGill Ranch Partnership Business Office - ' •\ - • 8815 W.Peoria Ave.,Suite 2 ' , . • e *, Peoria,AZ 85345 _• • - . . t . ----__,••••• ...-• -.... • • - -*JCL-IN.& VALETrA POMER 17215 N•66Th DR GLENDALE AZ 85301 • FOST216 6550.5100Q 15,4,5 ict 09/B0/, FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND FOSTER 1681 CARPENTER LN COTTONWOOD AZ 66326-5064 RETURN TO SENDER 1111..11 11.11,J1.11.11.,11....111W1.111..1 • tfcGill Ranch Partnership Business Office 315 W.Peoria Ave.,Suite 2 \ 2; sEP Peoria,AZ 85345 • Albert Effie Eckerd or cuirent retiden t • 17028 N 66 Ave t Glendale AZ 85308 • • 3314.! McGill Ranch Partnership Business Office 815 W.Peoria Ave.,Suite 2 2r S.10 Peoria,AZ 8.534,,5: • • ••- Jams A Steen Jr or current resident • 17226 N 66 Terr Glendale AZ 85308 V1.4. ;;1:- t.,.> McGill Ranch Partnership PM 0 Business Office 8815 W.Peoria Ave.,Suite 2 1 21 $(P Peoria,AZ 85.345 , 1859 t 4 • 449' Resident 17207 N 66 LN Glendale AZ 85308 • ..... 4. L.:, —.1—a,•••• • a • CIXSZ:041.47/A54t12. 111111a1111111111111)1111t11/11111111111111LIIIIIIIIIIIIIIM McGill Ranch Partnership .. t Business Office 8815 W Peoria Ave.,Suite 2 Peoria,AZ 85345 r' ;;,'.;"/. 1';SUiF:G;�tiT AOORESS • Vollcnan Family finest or current resident 1722 N 66 DR ' Glendale AZ 85308 McGill Ranch Partnership s ,� p i I<9,s, Business Office - I/ 8815 IV..Peoria Ave.,Suite 2 ? 2 t 'r> (' Peoria,AZ 85345 Mr &Mrs Robison or current resident 8401- 67 Ave. ti,, a Glendale AZ 85341 f;Yp =or • �::��::.;a�:f,_'• �a"s t�+�+;= t .LdLIAL,L,I,i,W,I,,,l.411",,,I,t11 I ILLI • McGill Ranch Partnership Business Office 7 `s, 8815 W.Peoria Ave.,Suite 2 :rq a J - PM Peoria,AZ 85345 017k _ •._.. 4,11 80 i /999 gJ9• --- _ Ms Florence M Weil Ms Hazel E Kallongree 6652 W Camino San Xavier Glendale AZ 85308 •.....�, a ,;�.' --1151,h;.1h.1 ,1,11,,1d__., "4.Y6A ;ri+ :Gill Ranch Partnership (Q.-ac ruAy / Busit,ess Office tY�� ra eo 1 5 W.Peoria Ave.,Suite 2 F'Se4DER Peoria,AZ 85 r e°u,.r rFJ�N cy_: \\-.2 P�� i \ /4.,:co,.,„ ,,,,..-i----, ;'/ �. Gf ''oof i":Z!a 1 h fi!�arb� ' r� t S'Agies E Boling or current resident 6623 W Camino San Xavier "., ,Glendale AZ 85308 • ha,/i:::.::,w:/.,.:::...••'i:•,.:. f::f F... . .. .. .. ... ... . ..... .. . ... . .. .. 81E3ut4--34F:-.7:':'4"_ -Y II.,I„i,I.„Il„1..I,1,1,1,1.,,1„111,,,,,I,111,,,,,I,II.,1,1 ��;C �Z6 _-------____---z. tileGill Ranch Partnership o PM c ---��.- '` Business Office �-M 3._ ', _--------___--- 2315 W.Peoria Ave.,Suite 2 f.'. I;` ... ” ' r� Peoria,AZ 85345 ;.�F .v,�f /� p -1 1,4: ``(ffc '44.9 44 f • Kenneth& Barbara I:unn or current resident 17249 N 66 IN 'I Glendale AZ 85308 ................'.4 i:1;.: .. . .. .. . ... ... . 4'!iii z:'47' 'S's•=r�8s'' %`G? 11„I„1,1,,,11„1„1,1,1,1,1,„I„111,,,,,!111 1 II„I,I 3aus! Gill Ranch Partnership '''":".-7.7.77-',.. y✓Y �`'' Business Office l'.` -' — 'f 5 W.Peoria Ave.,Suite 2 Peoria,AZ 85345 Y 3 sen Cz , :•.NCEri . _ REM..7. Ronald & Georgiana Strine Un;tr!•=:e2 :,c, or current resident P:ciu;te6•Nr'. 2801 N 8 St • Inaat;.!r,; Av ondale AZ 85323 • No SCC! ;. . .:lasbe1 • Ni ire:I, Do. • :-s r::�,;:::.::,.•:f.::y.... •�t.:f.tri:%2 11..1.1,I.,,II,.I.,t,t.l,I,1,,,l,,III 1 111 11l„I.l 0..,-,....---.. . :,7---•-, _ . — Mc Gill Ranch Partnership4.,.,...:.r,, ‘,..:2, Business Office _ 8815 W.Peoria Ave.,Suite 2 ...;, . N., Peoria,AZ 85345 ,,, 3 .../ — 4".— -------7:—.7 . 4 q. p ..'",.. Mr Tyson'A Ballard - or current.resident 17025 N 66 DR ,•;:f, Glendale AZ 85308 . . 6S7-L4WE402 fluhdd.dhdAUhL.1.111..ddLudadd McGill Ranch Partnership ..,,7 Business Office i - . - 8815 W Peoria Ave.,Suite 2 ..1 .. - I. ."11111‘) _ .- Peoria,AZ 85345 , .. . ‘... • 1707‘‘ j'S101 041 : / \] I\ MR DELBERT RUNYAN OR CURRE RESIDENT* ISSISW OL AYE GLEN° E AZ SSXII • 11411% 4, CURR000 653023000 IN 15 09/30/99 RETURN TO SENDER NO FORWARDORDER ON FILE uNAeLe TO FORWARD RETURN TO SENDER 6-57-4,.561-11.41.i,'2 flAddmikLhhhhimlai...1,16.11d1A • McGill Ranch Partnership -;'•,, . •s. ----- — Business Office . .,..• 8815 W.Peoria Ave.,Suite 2 , ( LC .....-...... ,-..... •."- :Vi// Peoria,AZ 85345 thh.... ... •$E P ---------.----... # _ . .......-----,__. _ <1./. • _90 • , .0›...._ . \\„ eell\)gifiEr CURR000 653023000 1N 15 09/30/99 RETURN TO SENDER NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE UNAELE TO FORWARD RETURN TO SENDER a SII-V2,44:7+Att,J7*2 NAJLAdALUL.hdlin“ddllimddhild • ' •' :.'• •.'-'",-'---:' ..,•. ••:•• •:i 4711sAlti1 • -;•.-:**.'111:-4444-,•• VPILW4:-.44"-••*M ••'•*•: :1`,,;',•.t 4r..*-`!•":Vs'iV(41 -•:. •-••4",.34•q''..'•—'''•••.'s'• • • ' 1 1..4".:•'•- .- . •• ' . •y•t-: ':'••••• ;1 1 ;:742:•;*•.r:'•: • • . ''"•: • : . „. . „ ,........:,-i. I - EXCERPT f . 7•:.• . ''.'• ;! FROM THE MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF . .',..,•-t- K -. ., Ti-11::. COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE ,. k tc•',,•;• .r. :•. :. "./ '•;•;?7•••• .1••• : - NIARICOPA COUNTY. ARIZONAJTELD AT * .1•.. -?,.. i _. = i'l ie04-i s e: e 1. • -, 7 00 P.M TUESDAY TI1E 23RD DAY OF JULY 1996 , . , ,i •...i:.•.;e -,: --_, 33 ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AmFt\inmFts. r 7_94-16: SENIOR CITIZEN - •- ,—,-. OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT -- ? ''.i.:' =•:-] •'.. .t., Mr David Prescott, Planning Manager, presented this item. In 1992, a sub- i4i::. 1:7-• committee was created by the Planning Commission to evaluate and recommend a :17•:i General Plan policy regarding Senior Citizen Overlay t Zoning. This was in response to .'. , .ii a request from the Casa Campana Homeowners Association, A policy was adopted by iee ?;- ..e eie the City Council in July 1993 as part of the Neighborhood Element of the General Plan. fs,...i?• •'.-.-; ll' it . On June 14, 1994, theCityCouncil initiated a text amendment for a Senior ... . . -.... CitiZen Overlay Zoning District ("SCO-) The Planning Commission subsequently •,',.• conducted three workshops on the draft Ordinance, and staff held a public open house. i,--i.• i :;• • , , On March 23, 1995, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the : ..., ' ,. text amendment for Senior Citizen Overlay Zoning, and voted 4 to 1 to forward it to the City Council with a recommendation of denial One Commissioner who was in favor • voted denial against his conscience to obtain a majority vote so the amendment could move forward for Council action, The Commissioners who recommended denial -..,-- indicated at the hearing that they did not have a concern with the structure or specifics . ... of the draft Ordinance, but that they disagreed with the concept or philosophy of Senior •-- ; ..i. te Citizen Overlay Zoning : ,... 6 ''•."-••' The Planning Commission reviewed extensive background information and .•(..it materials in order to evaluate and discuss the numerous issues related to the draft Ordinance This included information from other jurisdictions with this type of zoning, ,.. .. , • . .. legal issues, enforcement issues, and Federal Fair Housing requirements. ,-.• In December 1995. the Federal Fair Housing Act was amended by the "Housing • :l' I" for Older Persons Act of 1995." This defines housing for older persons, provides rules •';.;::- for verification of occupancy, and eliminates the previous requirement that significant facilities and services specifically designed to meet the physical and social needs of W; older persons be provided in age-restricted communities. Staff has updated the draft 2, . ordinance to comply with the new Act • . .-,• • • On May21, 1996. the City Council reviewed at workshop the SCO draft Ordinance and directed staff to make the following changes. The first change was to A *' • increase the visitation period for underage children from 90 days to 120 days. The s . second change:14as to create a performance-based description instead of a minimum i.i. .,..-, parcel size for an existing development Existing developments will be evaluated as to i whether they meet the intent of SCO and are entire subdivisions, mobile home parks, t f .,y .7 or multiple residence communities with defined boundaries New developments -.. apn'ving for SCO would still be required to be parcels of twenty or more contiguous . 1.7, ":1-:••,- %.,_*-•% acres These changes have been made to the draft 4' ' . . . ... z.-.. 1 i.i...:- . . -. . ... 1 'CI s telatign5082"rjaltilneenSIONOWIPM0".""Nr".""ft"*"...."."""... . ,---,------------ --:- - --7,-;.- -,-z---, ..,,..• 4,---.,.;;;.4-,v1-:,-,-,A.:,-;i4:4z.,:: .r:.1.1:4-,',.-t4:4'..i:::•'--r-..7C-zi.,,, -';!.-•'..•',-''.S--.:;,'',---. :. ,7,..,--40';:!!:;i:4144-... ..t;'fri'"; 54:4-Vi*W-*V1), Sk,',7-3.4 -':'••:` '''f,lci:Vii4;1:`P'-' : *''' '''''' ''::: f.''''' '''-;- ''I'''' A • i . ti.. 0 • '4- Excerpt of Council Minutes July 23, 1996 . *..t- Z-94-16 SENIOR CITIZEN OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT Page 2 -- The recommendation to conduct a public hearing and determine if these requests meet the objectives of the General Plan. If the Council decided to approve Z- , 94-16. the Council should adopt the Ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance to .---: • : include a Senior Citizen Overlay District. I .. • .. r: Mayor Scruggs opened the public hearing. Ms Rosalind Ernewein, 6616 West Eva Street. Glendale, Arizona, spoke in .. opposition to the SCO zoning district because of the differences between the proposed • • mandated requirements and the federal requirements. She felt that the overlay zoning draft was written in such a manner so as to accommodate certain areas that could not i- - meet the federal requirements. She felt that it could be challenged based on dis-crimination She felt that the City would be creating a dangerous lawsuit situation .., .-, because it knowingly adopted an ordinance which lacked criteria for federal housing .:. She stated that there was.a nAd for senior housing, but the proposal as written does • • .. k not meet that need She stated that the CC&Rs of a homeowners association are a • . private and civil matter, and when the City gets involved there will be criminal actions i. 1 r :,.. Mr. Clyde Evans, 6542 West Eva Street, Glendale, Arizona, spoke in strong r. .. 1 . 1 . opposition to the adoption of a SCO zoning district, He stated that Z-94-16 was .. - ,.. , initiated by the sitting City Council body and was requested by Casa Campana. He ..- .. commented that the issue was being resurrected, even though the Planning . .. - Commission recommended denial. He said that cases dealing with federal housing >-; laws do not belong in the hands of the City. He stated that the City was not authorized to handle. nor capable of handling, discrimination complaints relative to Fair Housing. He said that he fel this issue was based simply on the fact that Casa Campana could .. . :-. not qualify under federal SCO guidelines and that the City should not get involved. He • stated that he was convinced that City Council was in favor of this application, regardless of the facts surrounding it ,-, Mr Tom Cramer, 19608 North 73rd Avenue, Glendale, Arizona, discussed Del . Webb's efforts to create an exclusive senior citizen community. He discussed the • - .._ current demand for senior living and his feeling that this mentality was trying to move ....., . :". into Glendale I le nscussed the negative impacts of senior zoning and called for the denial of this appl-ta:Ion, based on the risk to school districts and the thousands of ... . , acres of vacant Or in Glendale. „ ._. .7'. Ms. Kimbeqy Omnes, 17476 North 64th Drive, Glendale, Arizona, said she lived in the neighborhood behind Casa Campana and was present to support the SCO ,. zoning. She said that although she has small children, she looks forward to the -.. ..... . ... oppo Li ity of one day living in a senior-only neighborhood and discussed the peaceful • attrib 1 of these • (-ghborhoods. She compared the quality of senior-only mobile home' mmunities to those occupied by families, which tend to deteriorate. . -. .-. ' . . . .. " .-.., 7:.:6"'-'1'Ner-,!..*.i: .-.4:-:•,;: -.3:1-.:-.,,tit4'i4en, :;; .-t"; ...,-,•-:--.•-;:-.. .:,,.-' :--,-- -.•-.t._-•-,-„-•: -• - --- •• • ....„,•:, --,-,".."-'',,,r0 1-,tt 11"9-45"--'1151• '-'..".-t9111t444V4,01,4.ta4 ".1.51,:,-0.-41:f-"::,trie,.#34 ,0,-NSI 4;.-4‘.r..X.--3,"t'>,,,--,='t's..; ...',-.0r,'';',V'ft,...:/a....: .P7..,0,,,i'VlM •;3.^,1.^,-,,-.`'.,, . .s" •. . , ,,.. t., . .--• , ., -.,e. Excerpt of Council Minutes July 23, 1996 - . • .. ,,, Z-94-16 SENIOR CITIZEN OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT ., Page 3 • • . • . -2-1.-.. -- . - • ,. c L-1 Mr. Richard Denton, 17244 North 66th Lane, Glendale, Arizona, a resident of • •:',e,,,. ,,,, Casa Campana for ten years, and one of those who has worked on the overlay for the e. .. , -.----.. 1. +, is, ,-Nr- seven Niars spoke in support of the overlay. He stated that the intent of the overlay was to achieve recognition by the City of Glendale that this was a senior -.7, t 'community. He said that Casa Campana hed no plans to ask the City to take on any of ,- , , t tits burdens. He assured the Council that their Conditions, Covenants arid Restrictions %CCe.RS) would protect them if they were challenged. He added that they were simply ...,,, interested in the security represented by the zoning overlay and were not interested in discriminating against children or anyone else. He stated that at least 95% of the • • esidents of Casa Campana were over 55 years of age, and these people felt secure .• walking the streets of Casa Campana at night, whereas they would not feel secure .•. walking the streets of downtown Glendale. .. ,•!, •..., . Mayor Scruggs noted that speaker cards were turned in by the following persons • in support of the SeniDr CitizerliQverlay Zoning. •. r.e. • .:.P. .: • - •tf 4 . Ms. Juanita Hetchler, 6658 West Camino San Xavier, Glendale, Arizona • . . • ... Mr. Kenneth Hetchler, 6658 West Camino San Xavier, Glendale, Arizona • Mr. Raymond Roseman, 17250 North 66th Lane, Glendale, Arizona .- Ms. Gladys Stottsberry, 17220 North 66th Drive, Glendale, Arizona ..: Mr. Richard Cornetet, 17026 North 66th Drive, Glendale, Arizona Mr. John Foster, 17215 North 66th Drive, Glendale, Arizona .,, . °.t . Ms. Valetta Foster, 17215 North 66th Drive, Glendale, Arizona , ..., Ms. Lily Streeper, 17219 North 66th Avenue, Glendale, Arizona • : .. - , ..4. - , Ms. Harriet Spaulding, 17023 North 66th Avenue, Glendale, Arizona .. Mr. George Streeper, 17219 North 66th Avenue, Glendale, Arizona • • v: ''.';'•-',' Ms. Roxie Buckner, 6663 West Camino San Xavier, Glendale, Arizona ... •41i• Ms. Beatrice Mackey, 6651 West Camino San Xavier, Glendale, Arizona ,,.. Mr. Isaac Mackey, 6651 West Camino San Xavier, Glendale, Arizona L' ,....- Ms. Nelda Ryan, 17031 North 66th Lane, Glendale, Arizona I.. „... A speaker card was turned in by Ms. Gertrude McCormack, 6511 West Eva . • .- Street, Glendale, Arizona, indicating her opposition to Senior Citizen Overlay Zoning , - Speaker cards were turned in by the following persons, who did not indicate whether they supported or were opposed to the Senior Citizen Overlay Zoning: •,•: i ... •.,;- ,.. „-.. 1 Ms Louise Fraser-Lane, 6541 West Eva Street, Glendale, Arizona th; .i;.` Ms. Sandy McGregor, 17225 North 66th Lane, Glendale, Arizona ., -0. •.!.if Ms Grace Millar, 6613 West Camino San Xavier, Glendale, Arizona le.5' 1,•,,„_- Mr. Thomas Millar. 6613 West Camino San Xavier, Glendale, Arizona , 4 _ . , . , . ,44k_ . .: ...,...,. ; n 1 ''''''•:-.-,I,: ,,, ;Excerpt of Council Minutes ,t.-::::;:i July23 1996 Z-94-16: SENIOR CITIZEN OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT 1Page 4 :,,,r-•:„ Councilmember McAllister stated his opposition to the SCO Zoning because of .3.: segregation created between the younger and the older generation. 'He said that he appreciated the fact that the residents of Casa Campana wanted to band together, but it was his belief that tne City should have no part in it. He spoke about his personal ..'..!.,.•:,..:7- feelings regarding having children and grandchildren around and discussed his ! ' •- ,.,.i.'. resentment toward the mentality in Sun City with regard to taxes. He reiterated his lack 7,...1 .,- of comfort with this type of zoning in Glendale. He called for adoption of a different, • -,-, • ',:r..* •' non-discriminatory attitude. .:-..:,... , ,.. .,....., Councilmember Lieberman expressed complete agreement with Councilmember ,..,.,.-.. , McAllister's comments. rt Councilmember Ewing stated that she was in favor of granting communities in Glendale the opportunity to apply for SCO zoning. She noted that just because the P, :... overlay exists in the Zoning Ordinance does not mean that it will be applied City-wide. :..c. . She compared this zonirrg oategoR4to the RR-45 category which was adopted one year .,..-..4 - : prior and noted that only one or two neighborhoods have applied for rezoning to that T:- i„ category. t: Mayor Scruggs referred to a letter received from Mr. Paul Dobash, who originated this issue in Glendale 12 years ago, which discussed the efforts made to establish this overlay. She stated that it was legal for a community or an individual to bring forward an issue for City action. She affirmed that the Planning Commission had voted no on the overlay. She noted that other cities in the Valley have successfully worked with this type of overlay and have successful school districts as well. She stated that her feelings were best conveyed by a previous speaker, Ms. Kimberly Omnes. She acknowledged that Casa Campana has always been a senior community and that restriction was somewhat taken away; therefore, she believed the community should have the right to apply for the overlay. She assured those present that the Legal Department had worked with the Ordinance to ensure that no federal laws were being violated She reminded everyone that if the zoning overlay was enacted, it did not mean that the zoning would suddenly spread throughout Glendale, it simply gives an alternate housing choice for those who choose to live that way. . ., Ordinance No 1896, New Series, was read by number and title only, it being AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA. AMENDING THE "ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE ARIZONA", ARTICLE 4, SECTION 4 300 AND ARTICLE 6, OVERLAY DISTRICT REGULATIONS, BY ADDING A SECTION RELATING TO SENIOR CITIZEN •' ' OVERLAY; AND SETTING FORTH AN EFFECTIVE DATE. It was moved by Eggleston, and seconded by Huffman, to pass, adopt and -i approve Ordinance No. 1896, New Series. . .. . . . , - --' 7- '"'-'• -'-.7 .----'.'4c:':.:- :=- "A,.:-:41':"..:_z:.J"::c.':.: •••'*:!. .','''?:';'"-',- :.'':,,,'"-_-.:'.-• :', _;.;:'•'.r.. .; --•-,..---....---" ,*:•!:.- ' ..•''.'"• r''.- '.'---•'.•••:-*• ", . •.-•'.-, - '7..._ -- - ..-- • - ... 11 i 0 -z, .•; . Excerpt of Co ncil Minutes • ,, Judy 23, 19961 - - Z-94-16: SENIOR CITIZEN OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT • . . ,, t..4 pe 5 _ rC 1 ounlember McAllaer-disagreed with Mayor Scruggs' contention that the i Peoria Schoo District has not suffered because of the actions of Sun City relative to : • : school bonds He stated that Peoria has had drat diffici.;lty in this area and he felt -1 - thiit-s type of ov day did not fit Glendale. He commented that it is a sad state of affairs ,.,. . • • when a city se regates its people. , . . 11 fi Council ember Ewing commented that Casa Campana residents do pay school ,. taxes. She no ed that the Deer Valley School District recently passed a bond issue, ... . . which will affect the residents of Casa Campana. , , . _ . Vice Mayor Eggleston expressed his feeling that this lifestyle and type of overlay was very good for seniors who desire it, and that they have a right to choose this ., . lifeslyle . . - -• Councilmember Lipberw disagreed with those in favor, noting that this type of ••• ,,.. overlay could affect property values and rights. He discussed situations where children . . and grandchildren needed to return home to live with their senior family members. He . . . ., . . , . compared the result of this ordinance to the creation of a special class of citizenry, . .. . , which is unacceptable. He stated his belief that neither seniors, nor anyone else, were ent tied to special property rights. ..::. . • Councilmember Huffman expressed his understanding of the feelings those who ., . . • desired this overlay had, especially when you consider that they purchased their . . . , property with the understanding it would be an age-restricted community. He stated his . . personal values with regard to children and his desire not to discriminate against them, ' .... but he said that he understood that others had different needs. He stated that he would . .,. be voting in favor of providing the overlay zoning opportunity to those who desired it. . j .: . .., . The Motion carried on a roll call vote, with the following members voting "Aye": Huffman, Eggleston, Ewing, and Scruggs. Members voting "Nay": •.. • Peterson, McAllister, and Lieberman. . • Please note: Councilmember Huffman mistakenly voted nay. In view of his indication of support for the measure, the Mayor asked him to clarify his vote, . '. and he indicated that he meant to vote yes. • ... ....: • . . . , -r *; ., - . ...,- ,-.-. 'z. . — !".. • . • s .. .. . EXCERPT FROM THE MINUTES OF THE WORKSHOP PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF GLENDALE GLENDALE COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5850 WEST GLENDALE AVENUE GLENDALE, ARIZONA 85301 OCTOBER 14, 1999 7:00 P.M. APPLICATION NO.: Z-99-21 REQUEST: A request by the McGill Ranch Partnership to amend the SCO (Senior Citizen Overlay) zoning district. The requested amendment would reduce the minimum size site for a new development with Senior Citizen Overlay zoning from 20 acres to 16 acres. Mr. Dan Fairbanks summarized the application, discussed the size of typical multi-family developments, and the minimum size of Senior Citizen zoning districts in other communities. Commissioner Potocki asked why the Senior Citizen Overlay zoning was set to 20 rather than 15 acres, or 25 acres. Mr. Fairbanks responded that the Council decided that as part of the adoption of the Senior Citizen Overlay zoning, they wanted a first tier of enforcement, which would be the homeowners association or management agency. He said it was felt that a subdivision that was 20 acres in size would have the resources to enforce their own private deed restrictions before the City would have to be relied upon. Commissioner Potocki pointed out that if there were 15 acres there would be less people to go around and it could be controlled better. Mr. Fairbanks said it was not as much a matter of control as it was a matter of funding resources. Commissioner Potocki commented that with regard to an apartment complex, there would be just as many apartment units as there would be individual homes. Mr. Fairbanks responded that there would be substantially more units in a multi-family development per acre than a single family development. He explained that apartments are often developed at approximately 18 units per acre, whereas single family development generally occurs somewhere between 2 and 4 units per acre. Excerpt of Planning Commission Minutes October 14, 1999 Page 2 Commissioner Potocki asked why the number 20 was originally set when 17 or 16 acres could be a sufficient size for a multi-family development. Mr. Fulk responded that it might be appropriate to have a different minimum acreage for multi-family than single family. He said the 20 acres everyone was thinking of at the time of the SCO adoption was single family development, not multi-family. He added that there can be a viable multi-family development on 10 acres. Mr. Fairbanks stated that the Senior Citizen Overlay could be applied to an R-4 site, which could be apartments, townhouse, or condominiums. Commissioner Morgan said it seemed that the attempt with 20 acres was to assure that economic viability was achieved. He said he did not see a problem with it. Commissioner Wurbel said her biggest concern was that it would impact the minimum lot size for future development. Mr. Fairbanks responded that the minimum lot size within a zoning district is based on the zoning district. For example, he said in an R-4 zoning district, a developer could pursue up to 20 units per acre regardless of whether they had SCO Overlay zoning or not. Commissioner Potocki commented that perhaps there should be a minimum size for multi-family, and a minimum size for single family development. Commissioner Mason asked if that could be two provisions. Mr. Fulk responded that could be done, and it could be tied to the zoning districts. He said staff would explore that as the report is prepared. EXCERPT FROM THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF GLENDALE GLENDALE COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5850 WEST GLENDALE AVENUE GLENDALE, ARIZONA 85301 NOVEMBER 18, 1999 7:00 P.M. APPLICATION NO.: Z-99-21 REQUEST: A request by McGill Ranch Partnership to amend the SCO (Senior Citizen Overlay) zoning district to allow a reduction in the minimum size of a new Multiple Residential development with Senior Citizen Overlay zoning from 20-acres to 10-acres. The request would not impact the present 20-acre minimum size of a new Single Family development with Senior Citizen Overlay zoning. Staff Contact: Dan Fairbanks (Citywide). Mr. Dan Fairbanks, Senior Planner, presented an overview of the request. He stated that approval of this text amendment would reduce the minimum size of a new multi-family zoned development with Senior Citizen Overlay zoning from 20 acres to 10 acres. He added that staff received one letter regarding this matter which has been provided to the Commission. Chairperson Williams opened the public hearing. Ms. Cathy Oliva, applicant, 8815 West Peoria, Suite 2, Peoria, 85345, stated that over 310 letters were mailed out and most responses were positive. Ms. Oliva stated that two negative responses regarding the amendment to the Senior Citizen Overlay Zoning District were received. Chairman Williams asked why this request was for a minimum of 10 acres for multi-family zoned properties with SCO overlay zoning. Ms. Oliva stated that their objective is to encourage other developments to be built under this ordinance for senior citizen projects. She said their investigations show that ten acres seem to be appropriate for senior citizen properties. In response to a question from Chairman Williams, Ms. Oliva stated that her company's plans are to build a Senior Citizen restricted development on a 17.4-acre parcel. Mr. Fulk clarified that the request is to amend the text of the ordinance to reduce the minimum required multi-family acreage from 20 acres to 10 acres. This application does not apply to a specific parcel. Excerpt of Planning Commission Minutes November 18, 1999 Page 2 Ms. Joyce Clark, 8628 West Cavalier Drive, representing the West Glendale Community Coalition, stated that they recognize the immediate and future need for senior accommodations. She said that reducing the requirement from 20 acres to 10 acres has implications to the future of every portion of this community. She said reducing the acreage requirement would make the concept virtually meaningless. A 10-acre parcel is so small, it would make almost every infill parcel in the City vulnerable to this type of development. It's a strategy to guarantee that more apartments will be built especially in central and southern Glendale. There is a possibility that there may be small, senior living complexes that become non-age restricted in the future. Ms. Clark asked that the Commission deny this request. In response to a question from Commissioner Morgan, Ms. Clark explained that what mandates a senior overlay is one person in the household 55 years or older. She asked what is to prevent an apartment complex manager from renting to a family that has their grandmother come to live with them. Ms. Clark stated that might meet the requirements for senior citizen overlay. In response to a question from Commissioner Morgan, Mr. Fairbanks stated there are two primary provisions to qualify for senior citizen overlay. The first is that one resident must be 55 years or older. Second, residents 18 years and younger are not allowed to reside within the district for more than 120 days a year. Commissioner Morgan stated that a need is trying to be filled. He said to meet that need, they will need some flexibility. He said allowing a senior citizen overlay on 10 acres, you would need the availability of small parcels because small parcels are all that remain. Ms. Clark stated that in a meeting with Dean Svoboda, Planning Director, he indicated when the senior citizen overlay amendment was first proposed and discussed, there was discussion about increasing the minimum acreage. Both Council and Staff agreed to a minimum acreage of 20 acres. Ms. Clark believes that there were valid reasons for the 20-acre minimum. Ms. Clark stated that the Ordinance is not broken, don't fix it. Mr. Bill Norgren, 8608 West Cavalier Drive, co-chair of the WGCC, speaking as an individual, questioned "critical mass". He believes that more inforination is needed defining 'critical mass'. He said there must be a financial size to make the system work. He suggested not to be too quick to approve this request because whatever is built will last a lifetime. Ms. Oliva stated that no one has built under this new ordinance. She believes the ordinance is broken and does need fixing. The minimum acreage only exists for new projects. She hopes approval of this amendment would encourage senior citizen overlay development. Chairperson Williams closed the public hearing. Commissioner Morgan MADE a MOTION to approve Z-99-21. The MOTION was SECONDED by Commissioner Wurbel. Excerpt of Planning Commission Minutes November 18, 1999 Page 3 Commissioner Wurbel believes there is a great need for this in the City. Commissioner Dolan stated there is a great need for the change. He is in support. Chair Williams called for the roll call vote. The MOTION PASSED with a vote of 4—0. Mr. David Pennartz, Deputy City Attorney, stated this request will be heard before the City Council. +REO iFili r NoV 0 3 1999 Glendale uept November 2, 1999 Ms. Cathy Oliva McGill Ranch Partnership 8815 West Peoria Avenue #2 Peoria AZ 85345 Dear Ms.Oliva, I have received your letter of October 18, 1999 which includes information about your revised application to amend the City of Glendale Ordinance concerning Senior Citizen Overlay Districts. You had originally wished to amend by changing the minimum requirement of 20 acres to 16 acres. You now propose to further change the minimum requirement to 10 acres. You may recall that I telephoned you about the earlier proposal which I opposed based on the limited information which you included. That information stated that the lower minimum allowed"more typically sized development." You state this amendment request using the same rationale. Nowhere do you document any studies,any examples or any reason for assuming what is a"typically sized development." In our experience in the northwest valley it would be more typical to assume that close to a section of land would be"typical." I oppose your amendment based on lack of information and also on the philosophy that ordinances should not be changed simply to accommodate one applicant. This ordinance was developed over a period of perhaps two to three years with much input from citizens, staff and developers,and I believe it should stand until proved to be incorrect. Sincerely, a,t,(,tkAA, -t Barbara Garland s/cc Dean Svoboda City of Glendale 99 nov mcgill sent ovrly West Glendale Community Coalition RECEIVE 8608 W. Cavalier Drive Glendale,AZ 85305 DEC 2 8 1999 December 21, 1999 Glendale Planning uept. Mayor Elaine Scruggs City of Glendale 5850 W. Glendale Avenue Glendale,AZ 85301 Re: Rezoning Application Z-99-21,McGill Ranch Partnership amendment to senior citizen overlay zoning from 20 acres to 10 acres Dear Mayor Scruggs: McGill Ranch Partnership is asking to reduce the Senior citizen overlay acreage requirement from 20 acres to 10 acres. The West Glendale Community Coalition executive board has reviewed this proposal and is unanimously opposed to this action. We looked at this issue not only in terms of the short-term benefits and disadvantages but with respect to long term results as well.Our first observation is that the McGill Ranch Partnership is asking this community,its citizens,you and our elected officials to grant them a concession from the existing ordinance.In and of itself it would not be an issue but the implications of reducing the Senior Overlay acreage from 20 acres to 10 acres has implications for the future of every portion of this community. Reducing the Senior Overlay acreage requirement from 20 acres to 10 acres makes the concept virtually meaningless.Why continue to have an acreage requirement?A 10-acre parcel is so small it makes nearly every infill parcel in Glendale vulnerable to this type of development. We are certainly aware that there is a great need for senior citizen apartments and we support efforts to provide more and better facilities. However we are concerned that the long term results of this particular change represents significant risk to the quality of the Glendale community.Data suggests that the smaller complexes(under 20 acres)are likely to have insufficient resources to survive over a longer time span.The "critical mass" appears to be at least 20 acres. When an inevitable,future money crunch comes for those below the critical mass,the city will be faced with a much more difficult decision and will be forced to choose between having the apartments vacant,or having to convert these units into more affordable non-senior apartments. Changing this requirement is a strategy that will guarantee that more apartments be built, especially in central and south Glendale.We have been told that in order for these complexes to be able to rent in a non age restricted environment a public hearing process would have to occur to remove the senior overlay. Our concern rests with the fact that no one can predict future priorities. What may be perceived as a difficult procedure now could be quite easy to accomplish five or ten years from now.Therefore there is the potential for small, senior living complexes, sure to spring up if this ordinance is amended, and to become non-age restricted future slums. Before serious consideration is given to this application the city should conduct an independent study of what other communities have found to be the minimum practical size for this type of development.This study would be crucial in determining what course of action would be best for Glendale and it's citizens. There are a lot of small, infill properties in south and west Glendale. We would hate to indirectly open the door to more apartments that cannot be guaranteed in blood to remain as senior only.The best way to avoid this dilemma is to deny this amendment and never construct a complex which does not meet a minimum "critical mass"! We respectfully request that you deny the applicant's request based upon our conclusions that: 1.You are not obligated to provide relief for this developer. 2. Reductions of the Senior Overlay acreage requirement make it all but meaningless. 3. There is future potential that complexes such as these could become non-age restricted. Again,it is important to remember that such an amendment to the Senior Overlay acreage requirement have implications that can go far beyond the specifics of this individual applicant. Accommodation of this applicant will probably result in unintended and unwanted consequences for the future well being of our entire community. Thank you for your consideration of our comments on this issue. Sine rely, A, Bill Norgren Co-Chairperson West Glendale Community Coalition Cc: Glendale City Councilperson Samaniego Glendale City Councilperson McAllister Glendale City Councilperson Eggleston Glendale City Councilperson Lieberman Glendale City Councilperson Martinez Glendale City Councilperson Goulet McGill Ranch Partnership Dean Svoboda,Director,Glendale City PIanning&Zoning CITY OF GLENDALE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION SUMMARY TEXT AMENDMENT APPLICATION Z-99-21 REQUEST: A request by McGill Ranch Partnership to amend the text of the Zoning Ordinance to allow reduction of the minimum Senior Citizen Overlay (SCO) size of a new development in the Multiple Residence (R-5, R-4, R-3, R-2) zoning districts. The minimum size of a Multiple Residence district with the SCO overlay would be reduced from twenty (20) acres to ten (10) acres. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION: A. The applicant sent 355 letters to persons on the interested parties list for each council district; to persons who spoke at previous hearings regarding Senior Citizen Overlay zoning; to the interested party list for Senior Citizen zoning; and to the residents of Casa Compana and Royal Shadows subdivisions. Ten (10) people contacted the applicant regarding this Zoning Ordinance amendment. The majority support the change or had no concern. Two (2) persons identified that they did not generally support Senior Citizen Overlay zoning. B. A notice of the text amendment was published in the Glendale Star on October 28, 1999. C. A letter in opposition dated November 2, 1999 was submitted by Barbara Garland. D. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this request on November 18, 1999. The following people spoke at the public hearing: 1. Ms. Joyce Clark, 8628 West Cavalier Drive, representing the West Glendale Community Coalition, stated that they recognize the immediate and future need for senior accommodations. She said that reducing the requirement from 20 acres to 10 acres has implications to the future of every portion of this community. She said reducing the acreage requirement would make the concept virtually meaningless. A 10 acre parcel is so small, it would make almost every infill parcel in the City vulnerable to this type of development. It's a strategy to guarantee that more apartments will be built especially in central and southern Glendale. There is a possibility that there may be small, senior living complexes that become non-age restricted in the future. Ms. Clark asked that the Commission deny this request. 2. Mr. Bill Norgren, 8608 West Cavalier Drive, co-chair of the WGCC, speaking as an individual, questioned "critical mass". He believes that more information is needed defining 'critical mass'. He said there must be a financial size to make the system work. He suggested not too be too quick to approve this request because whatever is built will last a lifetime. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Z-99-21 Page 2 FINDINGS: A. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Arizona Fair Housing Act, the Federal Fair Housing Act and the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995. B. The net effect of the Zoning Ordinance amendment will be to facilitate the use of the Senior Citizen Overlay zoning district for new multi family developments which are typically smaller than the present 20-acre minimum size criteria. COMMISSION ACTION: Motion made by Commissioner Morgan, seconded by Commissioner Wurbel, to approve Z-99-21. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Absent: 3 (Mason, Rosales, Potocki) The motion passed (4 - 0). CERTIFICATION: 001Z (17C2z-0-topo. n-i'41/ /0Cc__ 29, /999 Dan Fairbanks, Senior Planner /72/L, Date dc